有两个rulings。 推翻 Roe vs Wade 是 5-4。 禁止15周后堕胎是 6-3. “The court voted 5-4, largely along party lines, to overturn Roe and 6-3, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which involved Mississippi's ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.”
有两个rulings。 推翻 Roe vs Wade 是 5-4。 禁止15周后堕胎是 6-3. “The court voted 5-4, largely along party lines, to overturn Roe and 6-3, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which involved Mississippi's ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.” trilene 发表于 2022-06-24 20:28
有两个rulings。 推翻 Roe vs Wade 是 5-4。 禁止15周后堕胎是 6-3. “The court voted 5-4, largely along party lines, to overturn Roe and 6-3, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which involved Mississippi's ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.” trilene 发表于 2022-06-24 20:28
宪法之父Thomas Jefferson说过了，宪法是指导思想，虽然不应该随心所欲几年就大改一次，也是要随时间变通的。在新科技、新机遇、新观念之下，法律也应该与社会齐头并进，按他的说法：成年人不能永远穿着儿时的衣服。 “Laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/how-far-does-new-freedom-reproductive-choice-act-go-keep-abortion-legal-new-jersey Some say that this act allows abortions to be legally performed right up until birth. Is that accurate? This is not accurate. Currently, the law allows a person in New Jersey to access abortion care whenever they need it, including later in pregnancy, and this act does not alter it. A person’s health and specific circumstances, not political interference, should guide important medical decisions throughout their pregnancy. However, no one performs abortion in the third trimester. Inflammatory claims about abortion later in pregnancy are a false portrayal of what abortion care is. The people spreading this disinformation have one thing in mind – to push abortion care out of reach. The goal of this act is to allow the people of New Jersey access to equal and fair family planning services, regardless of status. Most women have an abortion immediately after learning they are pregnant. Later terminations are done when a secondary maternal or fetal indication is diagnosed and are usually performed within the second trimester of pregnancy.
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/how-far-does-new-freedom-reproductive-choice-act-go-keep-abortion-legal-new-jersey Some say that this act allows abortions to be legally performed right up until birth. Is that accurate? This is not accurate. Currently, the law allows a person in New Jersey to access abortion care whenever they need it, including later in pregnancy, and this act does not alter it. A person’s health and specific circumstances, not political interference, should guide important medical decisions throughout their pregnancy. However, no one performs abortion in the third trimester. Inflammatory claims about abortion later in pregnancy are a false portrayal of what abortion care is. The people spreading this disinformation have one thing in mind – to push abortion care out of reach. The goal of this act is to allow the people of New Jersey access to equal and fair family planning services, regardless of status. Most women have an abortion immediately after learning they are pregnant. Later terminations are done when a secondary maternal or fetal indication is diagnosed and are usually performed within the second trimester of pregnancy. lemontea 发表于 2022-06-24 21:24
我只是好奇哈，这里有多少人认为胎儿出生前一秒还不算生命，还应该可以堕胎？目前美国有些州是允许这样的哦，比如新泽西就可以：Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy 如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？ 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:14
9月的胎儿从来都没有争议。roe vs wade只有第一个trimester的堕胎权是完全给母亲的，第二个trimester要有原因了。第三个trimester要威胁母体生命才可以堕胎。roe vs wade是非常温和均衡的判例，被推翻是分外极端的 5littlemonkeys 发表于 2022-06-24 21:35
谁告诉你堕胎9月胎儿没有争议？有些州是允许堕胎9月大胎儿的，比如NJ。推翻roe vs wade就是要限制这些。 就算是德州也是要看fetal heart beat之后才不允许堕胎。
无语 ，以前就讨论过一轮 Roe vs Wade， 就是在支持妇女选择权的同时， 对胚胎-胎儿生命权“ after the stage of viability" 有合理界定。 大部分州将选择权画在24周左右，late term abortion 都是基本不可以的。 所谓最后一秒杀死胎儿， 是右翼的谣言而已 在这个时候又抛出来混淆是非 简直了。 现在是极右 神棍们认为受精即生命，并且要将这种理念强加于人，无视妇女对自己身体的选择权， 还有那么多女性为这种理论刷墙 简直了。红州已经是受精卵即生命了。这种荒谬理论，那些看着枪支暴力惨案坚持枪权，还号称pro life 的，才叫精神分裂。 The 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision recognized abortion as “a fundamental right” nationwide but stated that after the stage of viability, states could regulate abortions with the exception of when they were “necessary, in appropriate medical judgement'''' to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman.
无语 ，以前就讨论过一轮 Roe vs Wade， 就是在支持妇女选择权的同时， 对胚胎-胎儿生命权“ after the stage of viability" 有合理界定。 大部分州将选择权画在24周左右，late term abortion 都是基本不可以的。 所谓最后一秒杀死胎儿， 是右翼的谣言而已 在这个时候又抛出来混淆是非 简直了。 现在是极右 神棍们认为受精即生命，并且要将这种理念强加于人，无视妇女对自己身体的选择权， 还有那么多女性为这种理论刷墙 简直了。红州已经是受精卵即生命了。这种荒谬理论，那些看着枪支暴力惨案坚持枪权，还号称pro life 的，才叫精神分裂。 The 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision recognized abortion as “a fundamental right” nationwide but stated that after the stage of viability, states could regulate abortions with the exception of when they were “necessary, in appropriate medical judgement'''''''' to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman. luming 发表于 2022-06-24 21:38
那你赶快给NJ立法部门写信啊，Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy。在NJ是允许late term abortion的。这可不是谣言哦。这是NJ法律，你随便查。
你这段纯粹瞎扯淡，NJ有的是third trimester abortion，看这家公司人家专业做third trimester abortion： https://abortionclinics.org/new-jersey/late-term-abortion-new-jersey/ Founded May 1, 1992 by LeRoy and Mary Lou Carhart, our mission is to provide late term abortions in New Jersey 小气蔻蔻 发表于 2022-06-24 21:27
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. There are over 100,000 children waiting to be adopted in the United States RIGHT NOW. 20,000 children age out of the foster care system--without a forever family--each year.* Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. Adoption is trauma. It is heartbreaking, complex, and a major loss for both the biological/birth parents and the adoptee. Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. You cannot "just adopt." Choosing to adopt--either domestically, internationally, or via foster care--requires classes, interviews, background checks, and a legal process. You have to qualify (if you qualify), then hurry up and wait. Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. Some "pro life" adoption agencies make it very hard/impossible for certain QUALIFIED people to adopt--including single people, those who are in same-sex partnerships, the disabled (but not so much so they cannot parent), BIPOCs. Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. Though foster care adoption is often free or nearly free, domestic and international adoptions can easily cost more than $30,000 (and upwards of $50,000) due to travel, agency expenses, legal fees, placement fees, and more. Then, of course, there's the cost of raising a child--sometimes one who has extensive physical, emotional, and mental needs. Many qualified parents cannot "just adopt." Adoption isn't the answer to abortion. The answer to abortion is to fix all the broken systems--systems that are difficult to access in the first place--that prevent women and children from thriving. These systems include: access to food, shelter, education, healthcare (including mental health), jobs, childcare. The answer isn't making abortion inaccessible / illegal / punishable. And the answer, certainly, isn't adoption. *adoptuskids.org -Rachel Garlinghouse: (adoptive) mom of four
无非就是看问题角度不同。。
一些人是基于是否应该允许堕胎，纯粹只看结果 另一些人则从程序正义角度，讨论这种事情是否更应该通过正规议会立法程序来立法，而不是最高法院投票。。
“他们确实代表民意” 行吧如果你真的觉得美国政府准确代表民意。这次可能你得意了，下次吃亏的时候记得是“民意”就行了。
长期来看，社会是在不断左倾的。。 所以理论上来说，今天codify roe vs. wade要比10多年前容易，更是远远比50年前更容易。。
但如果连今天的民主党都无法做到正儿八经的联邦议会立法，手上票不够，那50年前的这个判例就更有问题了。。
在美国现行制度下，正儿八经通过国会两院进行立法，这确实就代表了美国民意吧？
靠几个任命充满了随机性的终身大法官在那里投票，那才叫离开了民意十万八千里。。。
要登记吧，找州的登记网站。如果换驾照可以顺便也登记了。
很讽刺的是，Roe v Wade当年的九个大法官是Republican Majority，五个GOP大法官都vote yes。
这五十年GOP和Pixiecrat与虎谋皮，已经被神棍反噬了。
一提名一百万的房贷和信用卡透支就有人秘密给付清了。
有两个rulings。
推翻 Roe vs Wade 是 5-4。 禁止15周后堕胎是 6-3.
“The court voted 5-4, largely along party lines, to overturn Roe and 6-3, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which involved Mississippi's ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.”
左右两边其实都差不多。。。不断的极端化。。。社会不断的撕裂。。。
哪怕这次民主党真的借机保住参众两院，多拿了几席， 大概率也会全面推动他们那些极端progressive agenda，哪怕很多提案其实并没有那么大民意支持 最终就是糟糕 vs 更糟，不管选哪边，社会都越来越糟糕。。。
给Beto做志愿者吧 说中文的太稀缺了
GOP已经不是当年那个GOP 不过民主党也更极端了
你说得对
I see
看看这个就知道gop在70年代末开始利用反堕胎来争夺权力了
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/25JyC5Whhvc?showinfo=0
就是那个非说自己是Hispanic的爱尔兰后裔？
那个Amy神棍，不是川普紧急把她弄上去出不了这么大幺蛾子
川普的政治遗产现在看到效果了 原来supreme court可能还有救，现在已经被他的三个提名在shithole的路上一去不复返了🤗
左右极端化 右是塔利班 左是什么？西欧？
你这个瞎起劲的人弄明白了这个判决的意思吗？ 最高法院只是根据法律的字面做出判决，不掺杂个人价值观 任由个人价值观的法官是恐怖的，幸好最高法院守护了底线
这次高院判决最后出来是什么比例？
整了几个跪舔的垃圾上去高院，川普一定要像秦桧一样遗臭万年
美国的分裂 真吓人
这肿瘤也是啊、你也不用去看医生借助外力了。
Beto 是El Paso长大的，这个小名从小叫到大， 有问题吗？跟ABC在美国名字不叫王小二有什么区别吗？
是的
尤其是移植，从别的死人身上移植器官，神棍们来说说，上天准吗？
说是不让的 但是trump得了新冠aka大流感不也马上用了regeneron
跟他叫啥名有关系，不就是为了显示自己代表Hispanic，争取选票，就把自己变成Hispanic？和Warren说自己是印第安人一样，当然现在连男女都可以自己identify，race算个屁。
你这不是让西欧笑掉大牙，美国的所谓极左，到欧洲可能要在右边挤一挤了
版上说半天美国要被极左占领了，结果最热门的issue居然是禁不禁堕胎？
这尼玛跟中国计划生育一个水准，一个不许生，一个不许停，还tm极左，希特勒吧这是。
没搞懂的是你自己。宪法是几百年前的法律，不可能预见今天的技术，这次明明就是几个保守派大法官以自己的想法去解释宪法。按这个解释方法，汤姆斯大法官的婚姻都是违宪的了
身体发肤受之父母，谁都不能动的
“Laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
搞笑了。
法官难道有权随意解释宪法？
宪法如果过时了，难道不能改的吗？
要靠法官来“立法”？
前面吵得最凶的，说不能让几个法官来做决定的，
不正是同一批人吗？
他们严格按照宪法作出符合程序的判决就是人渣，那么剩下的四位明显违背了宪法程序，违背了他们入职的宣誓，成为了政治工具的法官，到底算是什么呢？ 最高法院法官只能严格按宪法来诠释法律。反对的四位直接就告诉你，最高法院应该违反其职责去立法。 对不起，那是国会的活儿，那四位不该是法官，而应该去竞选政客。 所以说，这个判决的投票立马就分出哪四位是Activists.
问题就是人家并没有说自己是hispanic啊。 Ted Cruz 叫自己Ted 你们怎么不说他是想自己identify 成白人拉白人选票呢？
如果你们认为出生前一秒的胎儿应该已经算生命，那么此时堕胎不就等于杀害了自己孩子吗？这个不该政府立法管管吗？
说的是出生前一秒吗？不要转移重点好吗？ 哪怕法律限定为3个月12周都不至于这么践踏妇女人权
除非真的没办法，没有人这么做。
怎么总是有人觉得女性搭上老命怀胎十月就是为了出生前一天堕胎玩？tm什么变态心理？
现在就是联邦不管，每个州自己决定，如果这个州真的认为只要没出生，就可以随便堕，那就堕。至于能不能找到医生堕这么大的胎儿，那就看良心，我的OB就告诉我，他不会做abortion的。
问题是谁会在那个时候堕胎啊，想堕胎的 有需要堕胎的，早就堕完了
这次最高法院不就是确认15周不允许堕胎是合法吗？比你说的12周还更晚啊。
出生前一秒当然是我的一种夸张，但是有些州这样搞也是合法的哦，既然存在那肯定就有人会去利用。难道不应该立法管管吗？
宪法是可以改的。现在的问题是改宪法门槛太高，所以这些左派就要去法官们在宪法不改的情况下，按个人的喜好去作判决，而且还说因为宪法老了所以可以灵活使用
幸好高法还有点骨气
美国还是少，中国大月份堕胎的太多了。
法律不是谁想不想的问题，绝大多数人也不想杀人吧？难道杀人应该合法吗？既然有些州允许出生前一秒堕胎，那类似的事情就肯定会发生。
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/how-far-does-new-freedom-reproductive-choice-act-go-keep-abortion-legal-new-jersey
Some say that this act allows abortions to be legally performed right up until birth. Is that accurate? This is not accurate. Currently, the law allows a person in New Jersey to access abortion care whenever they need it, including later in pregnancy, and this act does not alter it. A person’s health and specific circumstances, not political interference, should guide important medical decisions throughout their pregnancy. However, no one performs abortion in the third trimester. Inflammatory claims about abortion later in pregnancy are a false portrayal of what abortion care is. The people spreading this disinformation have one thing in mind – to push abortion care out of reach. The goal of this act is to allow the people of New Jersey access to equal and fair family planning services, regardless of status. Most women have an abortion immediately after learning they are pregnant. Later terminations are done when a secondary maternal or fetal indication is diagnosed and are usually performed within the second trimester of pregnancy.
我就想问问你，说别人认为被剥夺堕胎权就是眼睛或脑子有问题，这是不是人身攻击？你这双标得真够可以的了。
当然可以了。国会还可以改宪法，这样就不关高院啥事儿了。
你是不是去补补基本常识再来耸人听闻？
那高法为什么不可以立法规定12周或16周以前堕胎合法（除非医疗紧急情况）？ 为什么要允许有些州堕胎到最后一秒，有些受精卵开始就不准堕？
那会直接内战
很常见很常见。计划生育的时候，生下来都可以处理掉。
你这段纯粹瞎扯淡，NJ有的是third trimester abortion，看这家公司人家专业做third trimester abortion： https://abortionclinics.org/new-jersey/late-term-abortion-new-jersey/
Founded May 1, 1992 by LeRoy and Mary Lou Carhart, our mission is to provide late term abortions in New Jersey
这个立法是国会的工作。
肯尼迪被杀都没有内战
对呀，这也是我的看法，立法规定超过某些限制就不能堕胎，是文明的做法。允许堕胎9个月胎儿才是不文明的。
禁枪/限枪不是能挽救更多生命？鲜活的生命不管倒管起还没出生的来了？这不是脑子有病是啥？
这帮人坏透了，不管男人的裤襠，只盯着女人的肚子。
堕胎跟禁枪有毛关系？我支持禁枪，也支持限制late term堕胎。倒是有些人支持禁枪，却也支持随便堕胎，莫不是精神分裂？
总统刺杀不是第一个 大法官前所未有
没有想到某党那么疯狂
而且 肯尼迪刺杀的原因 很大程度动了美联储发行货币的背后利益 而堕胎 管他们啥事情
所以女的有资格决定杀害9月大的胎儿对吧？还不让政府管？
9月的胎儿从来都没有争议。roe vs wade只有第一个trimester的堕胎权是完全给母亲的，第二个trimester要有原因了。第三个trimester要威胁母体生命才可以堕胎。roe vs wade是非常温和均衡的判例，被推翻是分外极端的
谁告诉你堕胎9月胎儿没有争议？有些州是允许堕胎9月大胎儿的，比如NJ。推翻roe vs wade就是要限制这些。
就算是德州也是要看fetal heart beat之后才不允许堕胎。
你想不到有关系也正常。我发现了，你可能连带眼神和理解力都不行。
什么逻辑？堕胎非要等到产期到了才行？ 你LP哪天被黑天使rape怀孕了，你有本事鼓励她生下来，再养大，能做到吗？ 还是混血儿，基因不错。
无语 ，以前就讨论过一轮 Roe vs Wade， 就是在支持妇女选择权的同时， 对胚胎-胎儿生命权“ after the stage of viability" 有合理界定。 大部分州将选择权画在24周左右，late term abortion 都是基本不可以的。 所谓最后一秒杀死胎儿， 是右翼的谣言而已 在这个时候又抛出来混淆是非 简直了。 现在是极右 神棍们认为受精即生命，并且要将这种理念强加于人，无视妇女对自己身体的选择权， 还有那么多女性为这种理论刷墙 简直了。红州已经是受精卵即生命了。这种荒谬理论，那些看着枪支暴力惨案坚持枪权，还号称pro life 的，才叫精神分裂。
The 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision recognized abortion as “a fundamental right” nationwide but stated that after the stage of viability, states could regulate abortions with the exception of when they were “necessary, in appropriate medical judgement'''' to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman.
那样的话直接就是内战的节奏。时间在Dem这边，用不着搞这种盘外招
我觉得你确实得补补逻辑。谁说了堕胎必须到产期才行？但是目前NJ就是允许9月大胎儿堕胎，这难道不应该管管吗？
支持堕胎权就是支持随便堕胎啦？那支持拥枪的是不是支持mass shooting？
法盲说话还这么理直气壮 拉黑了
那你赶快给NJ立法部门写信啊，Abortion in New Jersey is legal at all stages of pregnancy。在NJ是允许late term abortion的。这可不是谣言哦。这是NJ法律，你随便查。
罪犯主党粉，都睡了？
没错啊，支持堕胎权，就是支持随便堕胎。否则你就是支持限制堕胎权，对吧？也就是目前最高法院所做的，允许州法根据某些条件限制堕胎权。
支持NJ！你还有什么话说？
那你白费口舌一通干嘛？直接说你支持9月大胎儿堕胎不就行了。
你给的那个网站我好奇去点了一下， 如果要make appointment 的话直接问你是约Maryland 还是Nebraska的location, 并没有新泽西的clinic.
你的理解和事实是完全相反的。roe vs wade被推翻后才是有些州可以搞心跳法案有些州可以搞大龄打胎。推翻前是follow三个trimester的线
There are over 100,000 children waiting to be adopted in the United States RIGHT NOW. 20,000 children age out of the foster care system--without a forever family--each year.*
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion.
Adoption is trauma. It is heartbreaking, complex, and a major loss for both the biological/birth parents and the adoptee.
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion.
You cannot "just adopt." Choosing to adopt--either domestically, internationally, or via foster care--requires classes, interviews, background checks, and a legal process. You have to qualify (if you qualify), then hurry up and wait.
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion.
Some "pro life" adoption agencies make it very hard/impossible for certain QUALIFIED people to adopt--including single people, those who are in same-sex partnerships, the disabled (but not so much so they cannot parent), BIPOCs.
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion.
Though foster care adoption is often free or nearly free, domestic and international adoptions can easily cost more than $30,000 (and upwards of $50,000) due to travel, agency expenses, legal fees, placement fees, and more. Then, of course, there's the cost of raising a child--sometimes one who has extensive physical, emotional, and mental needs. Many qualified parents cannot "just adopt."
Adoption isn't the answer to abortion.
The answer to abortion is to fix all the broken systems--systems that are difficult to access in the first place--that prevent women and children from thriving. These systems include: access to food, shelter, education, healthcare (including mental health), jobs, childcare.
The answer isn't making abortion inaccessible / illegal / punishable.
And the answer, certainly, isn't adoption.
*adoptuskids.org
-Rachel Garlinghouse: (adoptive) mom of four
不管预约哪儿，总归是美国吧。纠结是不是在NJ没有什么意义。我说了美国有些州允许这么搞，NJ只是个例子。
都去游街了吧，
我的point是你给的论据网站很fishy
你的理解才错了，目前大龄打胎一直就允许了啊，美国很多州都可以，不用推翻roe vs wade
现在红州的法律是：强奸犯的娃也必须生下来，还不能剥夺父亲看望的权利
但是养娃就靠女方自己了。。。
哈，我悟了。跟你讨论这个确实是白费口舌。好在楼里明白人还是绝大多数。
你这ID我永远也不想看见。拉黑！
你搞笑呢吧？我只是随便找一个做这个生意的，你难道觉得人家是做了个假网站专门骗你的吗？做这个生意的公司多得是，我再随便给你一个： https://rockvillewomenscenter.com/2019/10/07/late-term-abortion-in-rockville/ As we note, abortion costs in the third trimester are quoted individually but are probably in excess of $5,000.