普通人不理解为什么有些人对公正、完美有比一般人更执着的追求吧，只会用有毛病来dismiss。 https://www.sengifted.org/post/silverman-moralsensitivity Kazimierz Dabrowski (1964, 1967, 1972), a Polish psychologist and psychiatrist, based his theory of emotional development,(the Theory of Positive Disintegration) on the study of sensitive, nonaggressive, highly intelligent, and creative individuals. He found such individuals oppressed in societies oriented toward competition, power, status, and wealth. Dabrowski postulated that certain innate response patterns provide a foundation for the development of higher order values in adult life. Through neurological examinations, Dabrowski (1972) documented that creatively gifted individuals had more pronounced responses to various types of stimuli. He called this phenomenon “nadpobudliwosc,” (“superstimulatability”); it has been translated as “overexcitability.” This powerful neural excitation comes in five varieties: psychomotor, sensual, imaginational, intellectual and emotional. The overexcitabilities (OEs) may be thought of as an abundance of physical energy, heightened acuity of the senses, vivid imagination, intellectual curiosity and drive, and a deep capacity to care. Individuals may experience one or more of these OEs at varying degrees of intensity. The greater the strength of the OEs, the greater the developmental potential for following an ethical, compassionate path in adulthood (Lysy & Piechowski. 1983; Piechowski, 1979). Numerous studies have shown the gifted to have stronger OEs than nonselected groups (see Nelson, 1989; Silverman, 1993b; and Miller, Silverman & Falk, in press, for reviews). Sensitivity, perfectionism, intensity and introversion are all aspects of emotional overexcitability: “emotional ties and attachments, concern for others (empathy), sensitivity in relationships”; “self-evaluation and self-judgment, feelings of inadequacy and inferiority”; “intensity of feeling: e.g., extremes of emotion, complex emotions and feelings”; and “inhibition (timidity, shyness)” (Piechowski, 1979, adapted in Silverman, 1993b, p. 14). Therefore, according to Dabrowski’s theory, gifted children who exhibit high degrees of sensitivity are endowed with high emotional OE. Perfectionism begins as a facet of emotional OE, but can evolve into the drive for self-perfection propelling the individual toward higher level development (Silverman, 1990). Intensity, while a strong indicator of emotional OE, has at times been used synonymously with all the OEs (Kitano, 1990; Lind, 1993). Introversion, often perceived negatively in our extraverted society, is actually a developmentally positive trait since it indicates the capacity to inhibit aggression. Dabrowski (1979/1994) described overexcitable people as: “delicate, gentle, sensitive, empathic, nonaggressive, industrious, wise though unsophisticated, never brutal, often inhibited, likely to withdraw into themselves rather than retaliate, having deep feelings, idealistic” (pp. 87-90). He felt that, because of their sensitivity and integrity, these individuals are capable of bringing humanity to a higher set of values, but that they are at great risk of being destroyed by society because of their inherent differences. The values Dabrowski (1979/1994) considered indispensable to harmonious living include: an empathic attitude toward others; tolerance (not aggression); responsibility for others and for self; a just attitude (treating everybody by the same standards); helping each other; giving thought to the harmed and humiliated, to invalids, to the sick, to the ineffectual and those devastated by their own loneliness; truthfulness; authenticity; and (9) just social care. However, those who have these values are often pushed aside in an insensitive society, and treated as if they were maladjusted. Dabrowski considered the so-called neurotics with high ideals “a mine of social treasure. If their emotionality, talents, interests, and sensitivity were discovered at an early age, society and science would profit” (pp. 87-88).
说应该海归二线城市的211的，说明那ID肯定不是学术圈。 越是排名往后的学校，里边盘根错节的关系网越厉害。好学校这么多人盯着，做事还正规一些。
普通人不理解为什么有些人对公正、完美有比一般人更执着的追求吧，只会用有毛病来dismiss。
https://www.sengifted.org/post/silverman-moralsensitivity
Kazimierz Dabrowski (1964, 1967, 1972), a Polish psychologist and psychiatrist, based his theory of emotional development,(the Theory of Positive Disintegration) on the study of sensitive, nonaggressive, highly intelligent, and creative individuals. He found such individuals oppressed in societies oriented toward competition, power, status, and wealth. Dabrowski postulated that certain innate response patterns provide a foundation for the development of higher order values in adult life. Through neurological examinations, Dabrowski (1972) documented that creatively gifted individuals had more pronounced responses to various types of stimuli. He called this phenomenon “nadpobudliwosc,” (“superstimulatability”); it has been translated as “overexcitability.” This powerful neural excitation comes in five varieties: psychomotor, sensual, imaginational, intellectual and emotional. The overexcitabilities (OEs) may be thought of as an abundance of physical energy, heightened acuity of the senses, vivid imagination, intellectual curiosity and drive, and a deep capacity to care. Individuals may experience one or more of these OEs at varying degrees of intensity. The greater the strength of the OEs, the greater the developmental potential for following an ethical, compassionate path in adulthood (Lysy & Piechowski. 1983; Piechowski, 1979). Numerous studies have shown the gifted to have stronger OEs than nonselected groups (see Nelson, 1989; Silverman, 1993b; and Miller, Silverman & Falk, in press, for reviews).
Sensitivity, perfectionism, intensity and introversion are all aspects of emotional overexcitability: “emotional ties and attachments, concern for others (empathy), sensitivity in relationships”; “self-evaluation and self-judgment, feelings of inadequacy and inferiority”; “intensity of feeling: e.g., extremes of emotion, complex emotions and feelings”; and “inhibition (timidity, shyness)” (Piechowski, 1979, adapted in Silverman, 1993b, p. 14). Therefore, according to Dabrowski’s theory, gifted children who exhibit high degrees of sensitivity are endowed with high emotional OE. Perfectionism begins as a facet of emotional OE, but can evolve into the drive for self-perfection propelling the individual toward higher level development (Silverman, 1990). Intensity, while a strong indicator of emotional OE, has at times been used synonymously with all the OEs (Kitano, 1990; Lind, 1993). Introversion, often perceived negatively in our extraverted society, is actually a developmentally positive trait since it indicates the capacity to inhibit aggression.
Dabrowski (1979/1994) described overexcitable people as: “delicate, gentle, sensitive, empathic, nonaggressive, industrious, wise though unsophisticated, never brutal, often inhibited, likely to withdraw into themselves rather than retaliate, having deep feelings, idealistic” (pp. 87-90). He felt that, because of their sensitivity and integrity, these individuals are capable of bringing humanity to a higher set of values, but that they are at great risk of being destroyed by society because of their inherent differences. The values Dabrowski (1979/1994) considered indispensable to harmonious living include: an empathic attitude toward others; tolerance (not aggression); responsibility for others and for self; a just attitude (treating everybody by the same standards); helping each other; giving thought to the harmed and humiliated, to invalids, to the sick, to the ineffectual and those devastated by their own loneliness; truthfulness; authenticity; and (9) just social care. However, those who have these values are often pushed aside in an insensitive society, and treated as if they were maladjusted. Dabrowski considered the so-called neurotics with high ideals “a mine of social treasure. If their emotionality, talents, interests, and sensitivity were discovered at an early age, society and science would profit” (pp. 87-88).
好多认识的人认识他 都说是很和善学术很牛的人 真不知道怎么才逼成这样。。
同问！
有故事吗？透露一点，满足大家的好奇心
那我也提供一个数据点，认识4个回清北港大的，9个回南大科大上交的，归之前都在美国或欧洲找过教职不成功。
非常难过……
这个被捅的人，到底作了什么十恶不赦的坏事，有什么内幕吗？我觉得这个人也是可怜，不给tenure这种事应该不是他个人决定的吧
我认识几个回清北的，都是这边没找到教职的，但凡有个教职offer的，就算是排名100的，都没有回去的
认识一个北大的，官二代，在排名100多的大学里拿到教职，挺满意的
我也认识一个官二代，官儿还不小，也是一路名校，还是独生子，在大概100名的学校教职当的爽爽的，根本不考虑回国的事
国内高校那些个党委书记之流没几个好人，我以前复旦系里的党委书记，还有些个辅导员，都是些人渣
不是人渣根本混不进那个垃圾圈
嗯，我出国前也在二线城市211。前几年导师的群里师兄师姐们还一片和谐，这两年两个海归的经常发牢骚，我师娘几次都出来制止说别搞得我们的群被封了
是的 考研也是 本校毕业的回来考研也比较容易
这个书记还是人事处副处长，应该不只是个传话的人
这是老实人被逼的没路退了，那个狗书记学学与人为善，好过丢了命
所以国内人说躺平也是有道理的，上海本地人怎么也有两套房吧，躺平完全没问题啊
你可以追求公正、完美到极致，但不用极端吧。这样的话，本月VTA那个mass shooting了10个同事的杀人犯也是因为追求职场公正就可以走极端了？
再说回国也是不错的选择 我身边这几年回国法考题的还挺多的 都是牛人 美国有很好的发展机会的 回去混的挺好 所以他这个也是个例 他当时应该也有校友信息国内高校是不错的选择 所以回去
还是自己钻牛角尖了 唉真可惜
那孩子后来还总结， 他的这次演说一般！心理已经入了魔了，太不平和。不知道长大了成什么样，怕怕。。
这个特别同意
谁还没几个朋友？
一个萝卜一个坑不是说tt必过，而是一个tt名额只招一个AP，前一个fail了才会重新招，不会发生一个tt坑招几个AP来竞争的
同意你说的，一般来说牌子大的学校还要点脸，越是没名气的越黑。据知乎网友说复旦是个例外
如果只是messenger 姜不会针对他下手，应该就是整他的人
这次看国内舆论， 感觉书记真是不招人待见啊
听着真可惜啊。
但是这次杀的是党委书记， 性质不一样
一个position找一个人这是肯定的，不然两人分一份start up？但是一个area可以招几个，只要能justify，甚至招一个大牛，给其package里包括两ap的位置的都有，number of faculty可是us ranking里算分的东西。
不谅解也没什么用。人走茶凉。特权阶级再见了
是啊，３０多岁学数学的，学术的路走不通了，转金融转码做点什么不好，哪怕就是在国内创业去教数学辅导班也能赚不少。
九十年代的时候复旦完胜交大，上海孩子不愿意离开上海，不报北清报复旦。现在沦落成这样，也是可悲。
以前在国内也是在国企科研单位，爬上去的不是科研出色的，就是你说的给人做儿子似的。去领导家擦浴缸，搬家，跑腿。
我也認識一個官二代，家里絕對能有上十億吧，北京上海都有豪宅，名校畢業，小公司，也沒回去
国内的卷可是一份startup分十份的.......
嗯，有的人就咒一下忍忍等老天收拾。这位没有伤害其他无辜同事吧。当然我们也不知道书记人品怎样。
的确，还有就是不停地抱着大腿灌水。这个悲剧和之前广州什么医科大学硕士狂发百来篇形成鲜明对比
手动点赞！！！
不要把死者为大用在任何人身上
以及冰箱男
一个人对朋友很好不代表对所有的人都好
我沒記錯的話，邯鄲路上只有一個大學，校門口高架變地下的那個
层主说得很对啊，我以前在外地工作跟人（房东）合住，从来都不认为那是家，我也是跟公司的说“住的地方”
真的是看得很难受， 怎样也是精英知识分子， 被逼得走投无路
国内某些T大领导， 吃相太难看， 所有年轻老师的发文他都署名， 十几年后， 就被后人当作学术大咖了。 其实p都不懂的
国内说学者治学已经说了很多年了， 但是实际上都是行政是领导， 教师就是辅助教学的人员。 真正的学者治学， 那是在民国
国内论坛爆的top2某一所内网看到的去年的qnqr统计，180多个外国学校AP报了qnqr，里面130左右北美top学校ap。最后要了40多个。你觉得那些ap是不是都是拿不到tenure美国没工作被迫回的？我也不说我朋友的情况了，避免朋友被人肉。直接看小红书一个叫马伊布的，lg放弃美国很好大学的offer回top2的，几个月前说lg回国实现学术抱负，美国没前途也没什么优越感，怼人怼的飞起，现在已经哭哭啼啼top2给分配的临时房子破的不是人住的，在想办法要把lg骗回美国。论坛里大概很难相信90后回国还真有不少因为粉红度高而不是因为在美国找不到position。扶额出…
夢想越偉大 失望越嚴重
冰箱男是杀自己老婆，怂货。上海大妈倒是和这个例子有点像，多年被刺激，受不了走极端了
完胜交大？这俩一个理工，一个综合性大学，一直都是差不多的，啥时候完胜过
这种案子相对简单， 警察立案侦查很快就能结束， 然后检察院批捕， 这期间就关在看守所里， 上脚铐，防自杀， 等宣判， 一审不管什么结果，我觉得姜同学可能都不会上诉， 如果直接死刑， 高法复合， 姜同学直接从看守所上刑场
杀人的人不是说了吗，是多年的积怨，如果只是个传话的，不可能下狠手的。
她说的没错，那个年代确实完胜交大，可以说不是一个档次的。
国内一手遮天的多了
怎么我认识的你跟看到的差这么多。 认识好一些拿到too2 offer 宁愿在北美r2学校 也不想回去的。 认识那些回top2的也不咋滴。。。有一个好postdoc老板 沾光发点文章就可以拿offer了
党委领导校长 但是出了问题校长背锅
别瞎说了，你是复旦的？
一看您就了解国情，前段时间有个土家族女躲在车库手刃女法官，被飞速执行死刑。
青千啥的
應該是通知 FBI 來捉吧....
我是那个年代的上海考生，还有比我更了解的吗？
我不是复旦的
“130北美top学校的ap”，这得是北美top学校所有华人AP全申请了才够吧。如果是postdoc这个数字还差不多。另外这位层主可能不清楚，美国的ap们现在这种环境是不敢申请青千的，这基本等于粗体特大号字告诉nih, nsf等等金主爸爸们：我有新爸爸了，以后请不要再给我钱了。
因为常识，百分之99的正确率吧
兔死狐悲，唇亡齿寒，对这事特别难过
这又是怎么回事，数学系把女生送精神病院后自杀。 姜说的陷害在指什么
你只了解上海考生对复旦交大的观感，而且跟你想投的专业也有关，你要是想学国际金融，当然复旦。想学理工科，当然交大。
有个老教授就是我师兄， 年轻的时候牛逼得一塌糊涂， 所以一般业界的工作也看不上。 学术界太残酷了。
那时的复旦理科也很强。交大主要是计算机专业很好
找一个好的律师。如果不是死刑，大概不会上诉了。如果是死刑，估计还会上诉一下试一试。
跟我考什么没有关系，这两个都和我专业没关系。就是从小的灌输，我是研二代，从小研究所里的阿姨叔叔们对孩子考大学都是唯复旦看不上的架势，理工类研究所。你应该年龄小，不知道那时候的行情。
那时候还没计算机什么事呢
不清楚
姜同学求生欲是否强烈，
除了爹妈 还有其他什么牵挂么，老婆/前妻，孩子？
中国人讲究杀人偿命，
这书记家应该不差钱，
就要他的命
这种案子一直都有，
杀领导的， 医闹杀医生的 要么大街上砍无辜群众的，
这种案子走起程序来很简单
你还真是大嘴一张。什么时候完胜过？复旦没有工科，是计算机，通信，自动化，还是船舶精仪完胜？ 既然完胜，那负担属于什么档次？ 清北档？ 就算是经管类，麦肯锡高盛之类的当年牛轰轰刚来中国只收四校，也没有对上交说你不配和复旦一档所以不去你们那里做校招。
美国近年来政策是ap大放水。我所知道的ap，除非tenure稳的，其他基本都有国内试水。然而ap真回去的不多，只有这边抱不上大腿的，startup用尽基金没苗头的，转行没转成的，工业界很难找的，才报效祖国去了。
没什么大嘴一张的，就是年代事实。很简单，你说的那几个交大的专业那时候不怎么吃香呗，脱离年代讲事情没意思。不说交大了。还有一段时间连清北在上海都不怎么样呢，那个特殊的年代