因为问的人太多，作者在2号的时候在其主页置顶了，其中有一句话 Unlimited lease allows uploading and monetizing on all streaming platforms, but it doesn't allow usage on TV, films or games without a separate license.
Ihaksi 2 天前 I think the live performance refers to gigs that you do. Performances on festivals, clubs etc, not actually TV performance. Got to admit Beatstars doesn't really give all the appropriate options on the "quick screen" to really represent the true nature of the license, but the full contract can be read before hand I think. That I can guarantee that I always sell only one exclusive license to any beat. I think people have mixed the unlimited lease with the exclusive there.
Ihaksi 2 天前 @今晚打老虎K I honestly want to believe that there was no intentional copyright infringement to begin with and as said several times now there shouldn't really be a problem if they just stick to the terms of their leasing license. It's kind of weird though that the publisher didn't approach me about the license and just be straight with me about what happened. Assuming there's a huge company behind this track it's odd that they decided not to handle licensing of a mega hit themself, instead the artist sends a random email himself without proper introduction. That still feels kind of shady to me.
Ihaksi 2 天前 I think the live performance refers to gigs that you do. Performances on festivals, clubs etc, not actually TV performance. Got to admit Beatstars doesn't really give all the appropriate options on the "quick screen" to really represent the true nature of the license, but the full contract can be read before hand I think. That I can guarantee that I always sell only one exclusive license to any beat. I think people have mixed the unlimited lease with the exclusive there.
Ihaksi 2 天前 @今晚打老虎K I honestly want to believe that there was no intentional copyright infringement to begin with and as said several times now there shouldn't really be a problem if they just stick to the terms of their leasing license. It's kind of weird though that the publisher didn't approach me about the license and just be straight with me about what happened. Assuming there's a huge company behind this track it's odd that they decided not to handle licensing of a mega hit themself, instead the artist sends a random email himself without proper introduction. That still feels kind of shady to me.
以前没有纠纷就算了
现在人家告上门了，
现在重新换一个不就好了
路人没兴趣
就想知道技术上这算不算换了beat
hp水平不高 还爱嘲讽 我真的吐了
老子买都买了为什么要换？
孩子看来你是以为99美元就买断独家授权了 没问题 你是对的， 再见
[ 此帖被贵人乌在2020-02-08 13:10修改 ]
99够用不就行了？
对呀，刘聪的Hey Kong大家才会说beats和旋律好听
想多了 不可能 早就转到其他帖子里又吆五喝六了
脸？从来就没有过 哪里知道什么叫脸疼
这也能优越一波 我晕
你晕什么?我说的不对?
说的没错呀，99美元的需要给版权分成
嗯，不用换。按协议来分成就行，并且署名由编曲改为联合作曲就行
音乐老学长TEN说的
芬兰作者“反复表示99刀那个版权没问题”
这句话全文没有找到出处，有明显的误导和断章取义的嫌疑 [ 此帖被moody在2020-02-08 14:18修改 ]
音乐老学长TEN说的
芬兰作者“反复表示99刀那个版权没问题”
这句话全文没有找到出处，音乐老学长TEN有明显的误导和断章取义的嫌疑
分给谁，Ihaksi还是湾湾人？我佛了，人家捐了款就被这样用最坏的恶意揣测，现在澄清了我觉得真没什么诋毁的空间了。别这么恶臭。
卧槽我可以说我从一开始看到ihaksi的视频就猜到这个结果了吗🙊
当时看到他录的视频，从头到尾都没有提到维权，更像是别人说ihaksi抄袭，然后他出来澄清自己不是抄袭的一个视频。
当时就怀疑有人忽悠ihaksi说他抄袭，然后让他出个澄清视频，果然如此。
这些人是不是人称见不得别人一点的好，看到有喷点立刻提着键盘蜂拥而至
别人不听不行吗？你那是说吗，人家作者说的话就是结点，你那是黑。
有一说一，从一开始微博曝出视频就能看出是有人有心在带节奏的 这个beats的作者整个视频里没有提到任何维权相关的内容 全程只是证明beats是自己写的 然后配的文案全是所谓抄袭侵权的 这个大概率都是ww策划碰瓷的 怪不到这个外国人上去
散不了，给得让他们看看这肚子里到底是几碗粉
分给作者
澄清什么了，你最好亲自看看原文，不要只是标题党
因为问的人太多，作者在2号的时候在其主页置顶了，其中有一句话 Unlimited lease allows uploading and monetizing on all streaming platforms, but it doesn't allow usage on TV, films or games without a separate license.
你需要翻译吗
曝光没用，一没侵犯用户利益，二没违反法律，钻空子行业
聪明的话马上合作蹭一波热度，双赢
后续呢？这就散了？那个忽悠人拍视频的下场还没看到呢。
很多事都这样，该有的惩罚还没来时大家就散了。既然人家给我们看了两碗粉，那个递刀的起码也得划拉一刀吧？
为啥那个忽悠拍视频的人就不会受到这种暴力呢？
多少营销号都转了抄袭视频，老舅拿出证据的视频却没有人再转
刚才看微博特意回来搜了下前两天喷老舅侵权，说这么好的曲子被这么土的词儿毁了。不知道这群键盘都在哪。
网民大多如此，跟国籍无关吧
@纯黑360
微博我都卸载好久了
我把ihaksi的真实回复在这里复制一下，需要的可以自行翻译。
Ihaksi
2 天前
I think the live performance refers to gigs that you do. Performances on festivals, clubs etc, not actually TV performance. Got to admit Beatstars doesn't really give all the appropriate options on the "quick screen" to really represent the true nature of the license, but the full contract can be read before hand I think. That I can guarantee that I always sell only one exclusive license to any beat. I think people have mixed the unlimited lease with the exclusive there.
Ihaksi
2 天前
@今晚打老虎K I honestly want to believe that there was no intentional copyright infringement to begin with and as said several times now there shouldn't really be a problem if they just stick to the terms of their leasing license. It's kind of weird though that the publisher didn't approach me about the license and just be straight with me about what happened. Assuming there's a huge company behind this track it's odd that they decided not to handle licensing of a mega hit themself, instead the artist sends a random email himself without proper introduction. That still feels kind of shady to me.
可以换，但没必要，自己花了99刀买的可以用五年，凭什么不用。
99刀买的不可以商用
你换个beat就可以商用赚钱，有钱干嘛不赚
这个回复和一些新闻的说法有很大分别哦
装啥啊，我肯定比你想象的要懂，我也喜欢老舅，先上车在买票法律上可能是没问题，但你听了原版的再听野狼disco，说句填词不过分吧，这跟周董这种自己先作曲在找人编曲根本就不是一回事
不是，野狼disco在春晚不就换了beat吗？这种还是看flow，beat并没有举足轻重的作用。举个例子gai的空城计也换过beat，beat不一样风格不一样而已，但是红的是作曲的那部分并不是编曲
你发这个没发全吧，作者还说了，在电视，电影上传播需要作者许可，
这版权流氓这么整一下，老舅不得干死他？
对于国内抄袭这件事，一部分人简直像疯狗
故意的，作者只是说所有原有的租赁合同，只要符合合同里的使用条款，就继续有效。结果到他们这里，就翻译成，作者说董宝石的版权没有任何问题。 [ 此帖被moody在2020-02-09 12:02修改 ]
是啊，只不过作者没起诉他，是买断合同的那个台湾人起诉的，作者那边的生活条件好，素质高点，要是作者起诉他，那一告一个准，现在台湾人告他，肯定不会成功。
作者已经签了授权书了，玛西玛国际有独家诉讼权
说白了，他唯一一首成名歌，就是靠外国人作曲成功的
没有外国人，他啥也不是
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av69066327?from=search&seid=4533151672325991502
和原版没有任何区别
而且这个外国人改口风，谁知道背后是怎么回事
这个所谓的宝石老舅不靠外国人写不出好歌
至少这是没错的。