VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.
Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause. Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information. The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines. VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available. VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the publi
终于等到yy医生回我了，只要不胡椒，就理我。
心情那个激动啊，心跳那个加快啊，给我上β受体阻滞剂还是非二氢吡啶类”钙拮抗剂让我平静？绝对听你的。
“为啥要等到病人严重了才加羟氯喹 Hydroxychloroquine：” 这是疑问句，带着请教的心去问的，好比我问，呀呀啊，我不明白，有馒头在锅里，为何非得饿晕去医院打营养液急救？这算胡椒？
你不理我，你歌唱的好听，还会吟诗，爱慕啊，那天我用九牛二虎的力量就做了一个视频向你表白，无奈yt不让，说是敏感，我表个白它也管，太胡椒了。
就在刚才yy给我了一首歌，太好听了，尽管有口音，但我就喜欢有辨识度的歌手，比如百合，闭眼一听就是她，LOL。
先上我的表白，如果YY不恼怒，我会不恋世间的繁华，哪怕笑我是傻瓜。
首先赞用心，10几分钟的小视频，应该是花了多少倍的时间，也是细节控。
这声音，粉嫩粉嫩的，师奶杀手吧，别人不知道，雪晶就扛不住要流鼻血：）
油管挖的好，掩耳盗铃嘛，心虚神马啊。
HCQ还有些人有不受用过敏或其他不适，伊维菌素安全性更好。
老印一村村的发Kit，用作预防和治疗。主料，伊维菌素，锌，C，D。
想想挺可悲，我们在曾经向往的西方民主国家，想吃片药这么艰难，完败亚非拉国家。
表白心迹呢，就是冒险行动，不见得都能能到 Yes， I do。别玻璃心。
现在能理解我前一段时间的郁闷了吧，自己对着空谷嗷嗷叫，连个对山歌的都没有。
没办法，在denial阶段。
引用的那一段Steve Kirsch也不是一叔说的什么FDA重要官员，而是一个企业家，他在会议的公共发言的时段说的，任何有兴趣的人都可以在公开听证会上发言，此人是疫苗的反对者。
他的数据来自VAERS，这个数据库由人们自行上报的，任何人都可以向VAERS报告不良事件，不良事件是否跟疫苗有关系，提交者是不需要负责的，也无法核实，其他的一些数据引用漏洞也很多。
不过我对政府CDC等也是不相信的，但是反方漏洞也不少。。。。
关键是让不让别人讨论和质疑。没有说他的结论就是100%正确，否则又走到另外一个极端，但至少你知道苗苗的问题不是你想象的那么神圣和不可质疑。
我知道隔着网蒙着面，更是卧虎藏龙，各行各业的人才。
打不过的时候，我跑得飞快～
被谣传成FDA内部会议的FDA专家发言，我觉得反对派的手法也不咋样 ：）
指出反疫苗人士就已经贴了标签，是不信科学只道听途说，这叫污名化，就好比不被主流媒体认可的一律归为阴毛论。
实质就是拒绝质疑。
由此，感觉数据信任度不高。
媒体有一个调查，本来是想要人说没打疫苗后得病的，结果你也知道吧
Disclaimer
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.
Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause. Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information. The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines. VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available. VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the publi
博客网友介绍了个专业人士写的诚恳文总结：
https://m.huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=2745285
在COVID疫苗注射后，317名运动员心脏骤停，问题严重，178人死亡。（文中列出了运动员的名字和时间和一些视频）
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/71-athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-26-die-after-covid-shot/
自己判断好了
罚你一个熊抱 ~~~~