California law bans college legacy and donor admissions, including USC, Stanford Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law that makes California the latest state to ban legacy and donor admissions in higher education, including at Stanford and USC. A new law banning legacy and donor admissions at private California universities, including USC and Stanford — among the handful of schools that admit a significant number of children of alumni or donors — was signed Monday by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said the action will promote equal educational opportunities. "In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. "The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly." The law affects a small number of private institutions in the state that consider family connections in admissions. Others that currently embrace the practice include Santa Clara, Claremont McKenna and Harvey Mudd colleges. The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general''s office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators.
这个法案对勤奋学习的亚裔学生是大好事。 "In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. 提出这个法案的人以及支持者都做对了。
开卷有益 发表于 2024-09-30 12:28 这个法案对勤奋学习的亚裔学生是大好事。 "In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. 提出这个法案的人以及支持者都做对了。
The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general's office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators. 每所大学都要提交报告,证明自己符合法律,撒谎的会被起诉
Stanford University receives significant funding from both federal and state sources, primarily for research and development projects. For the 2022-2023 fiscal year, Stanford reported $1.98 billion in externally sponsored research funding, which includes contributions from the federal government, state agencies, and private organizations. Notably, over 75% of this funding comes from federal sources, such as grants and contracts through various government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD). Stanford University receives substantial financial support through alumni and donor contributions. In the 2022-2023 fiscal year, The Stanford Fund, which pools donations from alumni and parents, contributed $27.1 million to support various areas, such as need-based financial aid, academic programs, and student life. Source: The Stanford Daily
dancingpig2019 发表于 2024-09-30 13:41 Stanford University receives significant funding from both federal and state sources, primarily for research and development projects. For the 2022-2023 fiscal year, Stanford reported $1.98 billion in externally sponsored research funding, which includes contributions from the federal government, state agencies, and private organizations. Notably, over 75% of this funding comes from federal sources, such as grants and contracts through various government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD). Stanford University receives substantial financial support through alumni and donor contributions. In the 2022-2023 fiscal year, The Stanford Fund, which pools donations from alumni and parents, contributed $27.1 million to support various areas, such as need-based financial aid, academic programs, and student life. Source: The Stanford Daily
dukenyc125 发表于 2024-09-30 12:23 California law bans college legacy and donor admissions, including USC, Stanford Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law that makes California the latest state to ban legacy and donor admissions in higher education, including at Stanford and USC. A new law banning legacy and donor admissions at private California universities, including USC and Stanford — among the handful of schools that admit a significant number of children of alumni or donors — was signed Monday by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said the action will promote equal educational opportunities. "In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. "The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly." The law affects a small number of private institutions in the state that consider family connections in admissions. Others that currently embrace the practice include Santa Clara, Claremont McKenna and Harvey Mudd colleges. The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general''s office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators.
dukenyc125 发表于 2024-09-30 12:23 California law bans college legacy and donor admissions, including USC, Stanford Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law that makes California the latest state to ban legacy and donor admissions in higher education, including at Stanford and USC. A new law banning legacy and donor admissions at private California universities, including USC and Stanford — among the handful of schools that admit a significant number of children of alumni or donors — was signed Monday by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said the action will promote equal educational opportunities. "In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. "The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly." The law affects a small number of private institutions in the state that consider family connections in admissions. Others that currently embrace the practice include Santa Clara, Claremont McKenna and Harvey Mudd colleges. The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general''s office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators.
really? can I assume Newsom became governor also through merit, skill and hard work? 😄
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law that makes California the latest state to ban legacy and donor admissions in higher education, including at Stanford and USC.
A new law banning legacy and donor admissions at private California universities, including USC and Stanford — among the handful of schools that admit a significant number of children of alumni or donors — was signed Monday by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said the action will promote equal educational opportunities.
"In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement. "The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly."
The law affects a small number of private institutions in the state that consider family connections in admissions. Others that currently embrace the practice include Santa Clara, Claremont McKenna and Harvey Mudd colleges.
The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general''s office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators.
🔥 最新回帖
是的。斯坦福只要钱够了就一定能进。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
是只对加州学生 有效?
要真是这样也不错啊……问题是,really?
所有legacy and donation based录取都不可以了,包括斯坦福这样的私校,会放出一批名额
希望东部常青藤也马上跟进
"private California universities, including USC and Stanford " 应该是针对 all admissions
"In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work," Newsom said in a statement.
提出这个法案的人以及支持者都做对了。
能不能执行是另外一回事。至少表面上看利好学习努力的孩子。 不过上有政策下有对策,中外都一样。
我咋觉得这是一纸空文呢?大学的录取又不是透明的,没有硬杠杠啊。
明年9月1日开始生效
会找替代方式的,像AA ban了以后有些学校就是靠zip code之类的去模拟。 但替代方式不可能那么精准,还是会放出来一些名额。
The new law takes effect Sept. 1, 2025, and requires universities to file their first annual report to the state Legislature and Department of Justice by June 30, 2026, indicating whether they have followed the law or broken it. The attorney general's office then will have the option of pursuing charges against violators.
每所大学都要提交报告,证明自己符合法律,撒谎的会被起诉
以后你不可以公开弄了,甚至你不能在录取时备注这个信息,影响力至少50%以上啊。
这有啥用吗? 提供起诉依据?
对后年和以后毕业的华人孩子是好消息
Exactly!不实行像中国类似的高考制度,完全没法禁止
那些完全不拿钱的小私校,是可能不管这码事的。很多大的私校,是需要政府的种种资助的。常春藤或者斯坦福都畏惧政府,不是为了其它,是因为它们都拿政府的钱。
路要一步一步走,先公布,让legacy变成让人侧目,另外legacy比例高的学校自然打击成绩好的普娃报的兴趣,长远看会影响生源。总之不暗箱操作是好事
这也太扯了吧 USC这种学校没了spoiled kids爹妈捐款 还怎么混? 州政府管UC就行了,管人家私校干嘛呢?
那校友该不该捐,捐了会不会负面影响小孩录取几率?
那到底要咋样你们这种人才能满意呢?
我也在想这个问题,私校需要钱的啊,要不会不会影响力就下来了呢
那就让大家都上不起学好了,上大学真的那么的有用,韭菜不还是得需要,让科技改变学习的方式。
现在左党的口径是,亚裔再hard work,再优秀,也不如劳模老黑从0起点开始hard work。亚裔的100分,是从90分的privilege提高的。黑莫的30分,是从0分提高的,所以更优秀
Stanford University receives significant funding from both federal and state sources, primarily for research and development projects. For the 2022-2023 fiscal year, Stanford reported $1.98 billion in externally sponsored research funding, which includes contributions from the federal government, state agencies, and private organizations. Notably, over 75% of this funding comes from federal sources, such as grants and contracts through various government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD).
Stanford University receives substantial financial support through alumni and donor contributions. In the 2022-2023 fiscal year, The Stanford Fund, which pools donations from alumni and parents, contributed $27.1 million to support various areas, such as need-based financial aid, academic programs, and student life.
Source: The Stanford Daily
清华的校友网络很强大,尤其在国内,湾区这边也不差。至于私人捐款,看下我回贴的数据就知道了。
申请到的NIH和DOD的funding,和政府拨钱是两回事
中国的大学体制和美国不一样,没有可比性。
糟点太多,不要被有钱人洗脑了。私校,尤其是顶级私校,是联邦政府funding的最大受益者。平常年份校友捐的远没有你想的多。
太棒了🌹,加州走在了前列👍
希望别的大学也跟进
同时希望小作文也能取消🍀
这些不算政府funding,不算纳税人的钱?联邦政府会给公校拨款?
对的,不平则鸣,才会有改革
没啥不一样的,所谓的校友网络,就是牛人多了,老牛人有能力有意愿带年轻牛人一块发财。问题是怎么筛选年轻牛人?和自己去的同一个学校呗
Stanford校友的孩子不优先照顾,又有华人要跳起来了😂
做做表面功夫,让没钱没背景没正确基因的人闭嘴, 实际上各种推荐信 课外活动 的加分依然是弹性满满
这样的话,以后学校还有钱搞科研吗?或者把捐款录取变得更隐蔽一些?
建议你先把基本的东西搞懂了,再来网上和人较真
其实学校的好坏主要看的是生源和师资,其中生源更重要。 大量中产的孩子放弃私校而去公校的话, 公校只会越来越好, 只是时间问题
东岸私校也不是都有legacy,比如CMU就没有。只有那种能混毕业证的私校才会有,CMU之类的硬核学校,有钱人的傻儿子进去也混不出来. MIT, Cal Tech也没有legacy admissions.
没错,我把数据白纸黑字的贴出来了,但你用来支撑你观点的数据呢?
说得太对了!👏
比如说孩子写在statement里呢?为什么选择这个学校,因为我妈妈就是校友,我从小向往这个学校,这都不行了?
really? can I assume Newsom became governor also through merit, skill and hard work? 😄
当然可以写,写了也没有给你加分。 比如,AO其实是有评分的,在你成绩的基础上,你是校友加30分,双亲加100分,你捐款10万加50分,捐100万加300分,名人如总统的孩子加500分。
法案一出,你还悄悄加分,将来被人发现,学校必然有官司要打的,而且会输。
还是版上大聪明太多了,看问题永远是负面,难道人老了都被成cynical的人了?
CMU一直有legacy,直到去年CMU自己宣布取消legacy
穷人又可以免学费,最后还是中产买单
是的
别拿政府钱呗,可以的.
AA 被禁之后 MIT 的亚裔人数立即上升 supposedly we are heading toward the true meritocracy, or hopefully
没啥不公平的,人家donation 也算是对学校有贡献,考试成绩不能评价一个人的全部
Legacy不一定有donation,只要爹妈是校友就行。当然捐款大户另眼看待。
是啊。
这种招生的方式永远不可能merit base,换汤不换药
原来大家都对美国升学没信心,那MIT 不是 merit based?
Legacy 录取就是赤裸裸的不公平 donor录取我觉得是可以的。 usc的donor connection录取只占到14%的4%, 也就是0.6%。 看不出为什么要给取消了让中产来养不出学费的。
感觉真好。
我还在想说为什么私校政府也可以管