A convenience store owner who shot a 14-year-old boy in the back has been charged with murder, South Carolina authorities say “He did not shoplift anything. We have no evidence that he stole anything whatsoever,” the sheriff said in a news conference Monday, adding even if he had, “that’s not something you shoot anybody over, much less a 14-year-old.” “We are confident that this was done in a manner that we will now classify as a homicide. This was not an accidental shooting by any means,” Richland County Coroner Naida Rutherford said during the news conference. “This was a very intentional shooting. And unfortunately, Cyrus Carmack-Belton lost his life.”
Following the peaceful protests, the convenience store was vandalized, with the outside being spray-painted and the windows shattered, an incident report from the sheriff’s department said.
德州妓女收钱，不愿意提供性服务，嫖客追出来乱枪打死无罪释放 A Bexar County jury on Wednesday acquitted Ezekiel Gilbert of murder in the death of a 23-year-old Craigslist escort. Gilbert, 30, embraced defense attorneys Bobby Barrera and Roy Barrera Sr. with tears in his eyes after the not guilty verdict was read aloud by state District Judge Mary Román. Outside the courtroom, Gilbert thanked God, the Barrera family and the jury for being able to “see what wasn’t the truth” and for the “second chance.” Had he been convicted, he could have faced up to life in prison for the slaying of Lenora Ivie Frago who died about seven months after she was shot in the neck and paralyzed on Christmas Eve 2009. Gilbert admitted shooting Frago. “I sincerely regret the loss of the life of Ms. Frago,” Gilbert said Wednesday. “I’ve been in a mental prison the past four years of my life. I have nightmares. If I see guns on TV where people are getting killed, I change the channel.” The verdict came after almost 11 hours of deliberations that stretched over two days. The trial began May 17 but had a long hiatus after a juror unexpectedly had to leave town for a funeral. During closing arguments Tuesday, Gilbert’s defense team conceded the shooting did occur but said the intent wasn’t to kill. Gilbert’s actions were justified, they argued, because he was trying to retrieve stolen property: the $150 he paid Frago. It became theft when she refused to have sex with him or give the money back, they said. Gilbert testified earlier Tuesday that he had found Frago’s escort ad on Craigslist and believed sex was included in her $150 fee. But instead, Frago walked around his apartment and after about 20 minutes left, saying she had to give the money to her driver, he said. That driver, the defense contended, was Frago’s pimp and her partner in the theft scheme. The Texas law that allows people to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft was put in place for “law-abiding” citizens, prosecutors Matt Lovell and Jessica Schulze countered. It’s not intended for someone trying to force another person into an illegal act such as prostitution, they argued.
德州妓女收钱，不愿意提供性服务，嫖客追出来乱枪打死无罪释放 A Bexar County jury on Wednesday acquitted Ezekiel Gilbert of murder in the death of a 23-year-old Craigslist escort. Gilbert, 30, embraced defense attorneys Bobby Barrera and Roy Barrera Sr. with tears in his eyes after the not guilty verdict was read aloud by state District Judge Mary Román. Outside the courtroom, Gilbert thanked God, the Barrera family and the jury for being able to “see what wasn’t the truth” and for the “second chance.” Had he been convicted, he could have faced up to life in prison for the slaying of Lenora Ivie Frago who died about seven months after she was shot in the neck and paralyzed on Christmas Eve 2009. Gilbert admitted shooting Frago. “I sincerely regret the loss of the life of Ms. Frago,” Gilbert said Wednesday. “I’ve been in a mental prison the past four years of my life. I have nightmares. If I see guns on TV where people are getting killed, I change the channel.” The verdict came after almost 11 hours of deliberations that stretched over two days. The trial began May 17 but had a long hiatus after a juror unexpectedly had to leave town for a funeral. During closing arguments Tuesday, Gilbert’s defense team conceded the shooting did occur but said the intent wasn’t to kill. Gilbert’s actions were justified, they argued, because he was trying to retrieve stolen property: the $150 he paid Frago. It became theft when she refused to have sex with him or give the money back, they said. Gilbert testified earlier Tuesday that he had found Frago’s escort ad on Craigslist and believed sex was included in her $150 fee. But instead, Frago walked around his apartment and after about 20 minutes left, saying she had to give the money to her driver, he said. That driver, the defense contended, was Frago’s pimp and her partner in the theft scheme. The Texas law that allows people to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft was put in place for “law-abiding” citizens, prosecutors Matt Lovell and Jessica Schulze countered. It’s not intended for someone trying to force another person into an illegal act such as prostitution, they argued. laohua001 发表于 2023-05-31 09:59
“The Texas law that allows people to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft was put in place for “law-abiding” citizens”
Rick Chow was spotted on camera a few weeks ago locking a group of girls inside his store and assaulted one of them, grabbing her by her neck and taking her to the ground near the back of his store pic.twitter.com/exvSpYdy7a — Sauce Carolina 🌙🌴 (@SauceCarolina) May 30, 2023
Rick Chow was spotted on camera a few weeks ago locking a group of girls inside his store and assaulted one of them, grabbing her by her neck and taking her to the ground near the back of his store pic.twitter.com/exvSpYdy7a — Sauce Carolina 🌙🌴 (@SauceCarolina) May 30, 2023
我肯定多少要捐一点的
自从前总统出来说could be my son, 这帮人可算学会了，次次出来哭my son
警察都不中立了，14岁的照片不公布，是不是少年犯不公布，尸体旁边枪属于谁的不公布。
新闻说什么我一贯不信。 警察说什么我也未必信。 查不出枪是谁的，这话只能骗傻瓜。
嗯 支持你也去捐款
这个说亚裔来美国之后总把自己当白人的实在太精准了。
前面一个层主说的果然应验了，关键词Latasha Harlins放出来了。 💊
不管红州蓝州，上到政客官员下到平头百姓，似乎达成默契，最可能被牺牲被舍弃的是谁。
是的，一整个评论区基本都在说Latasha Harlins
还有些更难听的我没截，有些人骂Biden搞Anti-Asian Hate
是啊 赶紧放上网，想动手脚都难了
奥八第二，又是一个好儿子🤢
放网上但是不能马上公开。
骗子作假你堵住这个洞不让作假，他还会寻找其他地方作假，你防都防不了。不如先让他作假，然后证据公布狠狠扇他一个耳光，让大家都知道他作假。
还不拔枪？
要把握时机公开。如果舆论挑拨形成了形势就太晚了。警察已经在带风向，很不利啊。如果有利还是赶紧公开
这肯定得捐. 警察是穿制服的黑帮
尤其是这些黑皮的。这时候一个黑皮女警察居然出来哭泣带节奏，上次一白垃圾杀了一波按摩店的，白皮警察出来站街说这人只不过had a bad day. 都啥米玩意儿
舆论就是跟着钱走。谁有钱谁就能操纵舆论。。。。黑命贵这些运动都是钱在背后运作的。
大的忙不知道怎么帮 但是如果go fund me 律师费相信大家还是能捐点的 不知道有没有人能和他儿子联系下
我愿意捐钱给他请律师
.
如果店主担心孩子有枪会伤到自己，难道不应该停止追逐而不是开枪吗？
你见过纽约外卖郎因为小孩儿想吃一顿免费外卖而被围殴致死吗？
见过为了车上的 25 cents随意砸车窗吗？
醒醒别活在真空想象里
不自卫难道坐以待毙？这样人人都可以欺负我们华人。在真相未明他们那么团结去砸周老板的店，我们也可以团结一致去支持周老板！
希望能够起到杀一儆百的作用！😄😄😄
韩裔还是可能的
两边都可怜，如果警察说的是真的
我也是服了，唉
警察带情绪办案也很离谱
砸店是犯罪，警察要能抓几个砸店的才算至少装一下，不要装都不装
如果你在店里，外面有人对你店里扫射，你可以在店里对外开枪，甚至可以出去开枪。因为他对你有生命危险的动作，你开枪是自卫。
可是这个例子是对方跑了，你拿枪追出去，在公共场所追一个对你没有生命威胁的人，是你在威胁他。这就是另一回事了。这种例子太多了，坏人从屋子里跑出去，屋主甚至在家里对外面跑走的坏人开枪打死，也是犯罪。
在美国有枪并不能随便用，只能在生命有危险的情况下能用，所以有枪并不代表你安全。最好就是不要在危险的地方呆着。
判了，就是不用蹲监狱，算是缓刑。
“He did not shoplift anything. We have no evidence that he stole anything whatsoever,” the sheriff said in a news conference Monday, adding even if he had, “that’s not something you shoot anybody over, much less a 14-year-old.” “We are confident that this was done in a manner that we will now classify as a homicide. This was not an accidental shooting by any means,” Richland County Coroner Naida Rutherford said during the news conference. “This was a very intentional shooting. And unfortunately, Cyrus Carmack-Belton lost his life.”
Following the peaceful protests, the convenience store was vandalized, with the outside being spray-painted and the windows shattered, an incident report from the sheriff’s department said.
只是探讨一下几种可能，很多时候你并不了解所有的细节，所以很难做出准确的判断：
1. 如果对方是零元购，你作为店主是听之任之，还是可以追出去？如果是根据物品价值决定，比如说一百刀，那你如何准确判断对方拿了多少？店主的损失谁来cover？
2. 如果店主随身配枪，那一定要先卸下枪才可以追出去？你这里说的店主拿了枪追出去威胁到了对方，那对方持枪进店而且可能是意图零元购，对店主和店里其他人员没有造成威胁吗？
还是那句话，细节决定成败。很多时候新闻里有意无意缺失了很多细节，就会给大众造成片面的认知和舆论导向。
完了。华人枪男开枪就被同族枪棍开除枪友身份
其他人背凉不凉？
那些去砸加油站的可没在乎这么多细节。
真的在乎所有这些具体细节的人，应该是少数，而且对大众的影响力也小。毕竟，啥细节也不如一些吸引眼球的夸张煽情描述更能打动人。
看现在的舆论导向
估计陪审团会以最快速度判谋杀
我怀疑这个事警方说的不是完全事实。店主追出去肯定是有原因的
跟白人黑人亚裔什么的种族颜色一点关系都没有
那个被打死的黑小子确实有枪，如果是在偷窃过程里发生扭打，你发现他有枪，一枪崩了他，那就是自卫了。如果对方扬言要回来枪杀你，你先开枪打死他，法庭上也还有得斗。
但现在这样对方逃逸了，你出去追杀肯定不是自卫了。
这完全不一样啊，人跑到街上了，完全跑出了他的property,又是背后，确实不能算自卫啊
德州妓女收钱，不愿意提供性服务，嫖客追出来乱枪打死无罪释放
A Bexar County jury on Wednesday acquitted Ezekiel Gilbert of murder in the death of a 23-year-old Craigslist escort. Gilbert, 30, embraced defense attorneys Bobby Barrera and Roy Barrera Sr. with tears in his eyes after the not guilty verdict was read aloud by state District Judge Mary Román. Outside the courtroom, Gilbert thanked God, the Barrera family and the jury for being able to “see what wasn’t the truth” and for the “second chance.” Had he been convicted, he could have faced up to life in prison for the slaying of Lenora Ivie Frago who died about seven months after she was shot in the neck and paralyzed on Christmas Eve 2009. Gilbert admitted shooting Frago. “I sincerely regret the loss of the life of Ms. Frago,” Gilbert said Wednesday. “I’ve been in a mental prison the past four years of my life. I have nightmares. If I see guns on TV where people are getting killed, I change the channel.” The verdict came after almost 11 hours of deliberations that stretched over two days. The trial began May 17 but had a long hiatus after a juror unexpectedly had to leave town for a funeral. During closing arguments Tuesday, Gilbert’s defense team conceded the shooting did occur but said the intent wasn’t to kill. Gilbert’s actions were justified, they argued, because he was trying to retrieve stolen property: the $150 he paid Frago. It became theft when she refused to have sex with him or give the money back, they said. Gilbert testified earlier Tuesday that he had found Frago’s escort ad on Craigslist and believed sex was included in her $150 fee. But instead, Frago walked around his apartment and after about 20 minutes left, saying she had to give the money to her driver, he said. That driver, the defense contended, was Frago’s pimp and her partner in the theft scheme. The Texas law that allows people to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft was put in place for “law-abiding” citizens, prosecutors Matt Lovell and Jessica Schulze countered. It’s not intended for someone trying to force another person into an illegal act such as prostitution, they argued.
警察哭什么？警察也是黑人？平时就开罚单，屁事不管，哭的太煽火了。抗议的凭什么砸东西。
还是要看细节。
追出去很正常，不等于追出去的时候就是要打死对方。
如果追的过程中发现对方威胁自己的生命了，那么自然可能是正当防卫。
当然了，纠缠这些细节，实际上不如警长公开的哭一把，或者一堆人去砸加油站更吸引眼球。。。 咱大伙儿就是八卦一把而已。
哭的太煽火了？在社交媒体上，不煽火有人看么？
至于抗议的凭什么砸东西。。。 反正人家肯定不是凭自个儿能讲出道理来这一点。。。。
这个官司要论起来，可以和那个洪波父子枪杀一个跑步黑皮的相提并论了，同样是追出去突突，白皮给的理由是怀疑黑皮是想偷东西，而这个店主给出的理由是零元购，当初白皮没被起诉，后来不知被谁爆出来了，就起诉了，判了多久没再关注，这么看来这店主进去是大概率了
“The Texas law that allows people to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft was put in place for “law-abiding” citizens”
如果少年手里拿着店里偷窃的一瓶水，并且这件事发生在德州，那可以无罪
可惜不是这个情况
自己在哪个州当然要按州的法律办事，我这开枪打屋子里的毒蛇都要抓去关
动脑子想想
店主做生意的，为啥要追出去？
新闻说了，黑小子把那瓶水放回冰箱了。。。
这件事铁定谋杀会定罪，不用想了
那店主为啥要追出去？ 就为了杀人么？
说实话，为了瓶水追出去确实不太适宜，可能店主当时脑子热了吧，有枪在手，这还好是碰到一个小黑皮，如果是黑帮的话，这对父子怕是没命了
警察的话还真不能信，一派胡言的不少，我是真见识过！
我也这么觉得，华人应该集资为这位业主请好律师。
就是平时被零元购欺负多了，上火上头了呗
所以这些条子平时不干活，出事了出来掉眼泪，非常可恶
持枪不是被打死的理由。南卡本来就可以持枪。你这个逻辑有问题。如果别人没有拿枪威胁你，你就可以杀人而不受惩罚。那以后杀人的门槛不是太低了么。至少法律要求是在生命受到威胁的时候才能开枪自卫的。你这个是站在自己的立场考虑，觉得如果等对方拿出枪来再开枪就晚了。那如果你是这个连枪都没掏也没有威胁他人就被打死的，岂不是更冤枉？
这个办法可行，这种时候不管你认为这是不是justified，华人都应该支持店主
不是说我们要不管是非，我们就在法庭上做攻防好了，这件事如果有强力的律师，可能并不是无转机，毕竟对方有枪，强力的律师团可能有招
如果有捐钱链接，华人网友请一定告知一下
所以这个案子不难判。只不过咱们都是在瞎猜罢了。到时候在法庭上肯定会有证据的。
其实也怪不了警察，有法律说多少以下不起诉，抓了白抓，所以警察不作为也无可厚非
现在的问题是文章里说了，视频显示他没有偷东西。
我也支持持枪自卫。但是你得真的是持枪自卫。他如果真的是持枪自卫肯定不会有事的。现在的问题是，文章说，他既没有偷东西，也没有拿枪威胁店主。具体怎么样就看开庭时候的证据了。
他既没有偷东西，也没有拿枪威胁店主
那么店主为什么要追出去开枪？ 就为杀人么？
貌似那个人攻击保安了。那个人被打死不是因为偷东西。而是因为攻击他人。
对方有枪
因为标题上写了，店主怀疑他偷东西。 他可能在监视器里看到他拿了水，但是没有看到他放回去？ 上庭了，可能会公布视频吧 网上还有一段几周前的视频
本质就是美国公共治安系统能力低下
如果坏人在外面对你开枪，你可以还击啊。问题是没有啊。在南卡不太存在家里家外的概念。只要是生命受到威胁都可以自卫。枪是用来自卫的，是在人身安全受到威胁的情况下进行的。店主不是执法人员。不能因为自己觉得那个人偷东西了就拿枪追上去。而且这起案件14岁的人还没有偷东西。从那个小孩的角度考虑，我被人拿枪尾随，开枪是自卫啊。😂
米国的垃圾警察才是祸害, 光拿钱不干活
但是如果那个小孩没有偷东西，没有拿枪威胁店主，被店主打死。我们为什么要支持店主？完全看肤色？
至少应该让地方政府把拨给警察局的钱退回来.
没照片, 14岁的少年一般人高马大了.
猜测这个14岁的黑人男孩比老头和他儿子高一头壮一圈