where did you see "people say" ? I am not a "scientific worker" either ... Some of Trump's words are crazy indeed, like building a wall ... or ban all the Muslims. They are annoying, but what else can I do ? Jill Stein is my favorite, but she has no chance ...
brookhaven 发表于 9/28/2016 10:11:38 PM
I agree with you that both Gary Johnson and Jill Stein should have a chance to debate.
where did you see "people say" ? I am not a "scientific worker" either ... Some of Trump's words are crazy indeed, like building a wall ... or ban all the Muslims. They are annoying, but what else can I do ? Jill Stein is my favorite, but she has no chance ...
it is Dem or Rep does not matter that much, while the email issue of Hillary is unbelievable, too careless to be a president. I used to be scared of terrorists attacking and supported Trump, while repelling refugee can make the situation even worse.
it is Dem or Rep does not matter that much, while the email issue of Hillary is unbelievable, too careless to be a president. I used to be scared of terrorists attacking and supported Trump, while repelling refugee can make the situation even worse.
He spent other people's donation to buy himself toys, portrait, etc. I agree Hillary may not be my kind of candidate for president. But Donald Trump is not even the kind the people I standing near by with. HE IS NOT A DECENT HUMAN BEING period.
My reaction to the Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton debate can be summarized with one word: “How?”
How in the world do we put a man in the Oval Office who thinks NATO is a shopping mall where the tenants aren’t paying enough rent to the U.S. landlord?
NATO is not a shopping mall; it is a strategic alliance that won the Cold War, keeps Europe a stable trading partner for U.S. companies and prevents every European country — particularly Germany — from getting their own nukes to counterbalance Russia, by sheltering them all under America’s nuclear umbrella.
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who does not know enough “beef” about key policies to finish a two-minute answer on any issue without the hamburger helper of bluster, insults and repetition?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who suggests that the recent spate of cyberattacks — which any senior U.S. intelligence official will tell you came without question from Russia — might not have come from Russia but could have been done by “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds”?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who boasts that he tries to pay zero federal taxes but then complains that our airports and roads are falling apart and there is not enough money for our veterans?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who claims he was against the Iraq war, because he said he privately told that to his pal Sean Hannity of Fox News — even though he publicly supported the war when it began. Trump is so obsessed with proving his infallibility that he missed scoring an easy debate point for himself by saying, “Yes, I supported the Iraq war as a citizen, but Hillary voted for it as a senator when she had access to the intelligence and her job was to make the right judgment.”
How do we put in the Oval Office someone who says we should not have gone into Iraq, but since we did, “we should have taken the oil — ISIS would not have been able to form … because the oil was their primary source of income.” ...
My reaction to the Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton debate can be summarized with one word: “How?”
How in the world do we put a man in the Oval Office who thinks NATO is a shopping mall where the tenants aren’t paying enough rent to the U.S. landlord?
NATO is not a shopping mall; it is a strategic alliance that won the Cold War, keeps Europe a stable trading partner for U.S. companies and prevents every European country — particularly Germany — from getting their own nukes to counterbalance Russia, by sheltering them all under America’s nuclear umbrella.
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who does not know enough “beef” about key policies to finish a two-minute answer on any issue without the hamburger helper of bluster, insults and repetition?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who suggests that the recent spate of cyberattacks — which any senior U.S. intelligence official will tell you came without question from Russia — might not have come from Russia but could have been done by “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds”?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who boasts that he tries to pay zero federal taxes but then complains that our airports and roads are falling apart and there is not enough money for our veterans?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who claims he was against the Iraq war, because he said he privately told that to his pal Sean Hannity of Fox News — even though he publicly supported the war when it began. Trump is so obsessed with proving his infallibility that he missed scoring an easy debate point for himself by saying, “Yes, I supported the Iraq war as a citizen, but Hillary voted for it as a senator when she had access to the intelligence and her job was to make the right judgment.”
How do we put in the Oval Office someone who says we should not have gone into Iraq, but since we did, “we should have taken the oil — ISIS would not have been able to form … because the oil was their primary source of income.” ...
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2047235&&page=1
我只是把蛀党的丰功伟绩罗列一下就有味道了？是蛀党的浓厚气味熏了你吧
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2033281
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2047235&&page=1
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2033281
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2047235&&page=1
http://www.cato.org/blog/syrian-refugees-dont-pose-serious-security-threat
我觉得这个才scary。 有人说trump无知没关系， 会有人给他出谋划新。 但是看看他的经济班子里都是些什么人。内阁可是总统任命的
简直了，简直了。干嘛非得把科学政治化呢? 究竟有没有变暖，先读几本environmental science的书再说，再来说说什么是误差什么是依据。那么多科学先驱，几十年的复杂研究成果，就被一句是左还是右的标签给贬低抹消了。
民主党在历史上曾经是一个落后的党，没有错。但这并不代表民主党在当前是一个相对progressive，为大众考虑的党。就像把秦始皇残暴的历史拿出来说中国人自古以来就是这样的，一直没有变过，你同意么？不要把很复杂的历史简单化，这样对历史本身是暴力。
我也是刚从一个trump粉那学到的，点击图像然后左下角有个屏蔽该用户，世界终于清静啦~~~~~~~
你自己说吧，究竟谁的逻辑智商有问题。GRE逻辑里的典型题目，由关注a本身而做出选择，但你非要攻击选择b的原因。
否则选完了一统计, 华人投票率最低, 制定政策和立法的时候就根本不用考虑华人了.
一定要去投票!!!
一定要去投票!!!
一定要去投票!!!
你看，逻辑又出现问题了。真是一个编程有问题的机器人啊。
民主党欺负华人，不代表共和党不会欺负得更甚？从哪个逻辑可以证明出川普不会欺负得更甚？
要说丑闻，床铺的丑闻远大过于希拉里！希拉里的邮件门，知道越多就越不觉得有问题，可床铺那堆丑闻呢？tax? Trump foundation? 甚至连blind trust 都不知道，真是贻笑大方。居然华人上作为高知的一个群体（也许并不是高知，我高估了华人的群体组成，那些没工作的大妈应该还是在床粉中占一大部分）不能分辨。
会投的，已经登记了。
你又是什么东西？一个拿钱发帖，颠倒黑白，没有良知，没有脸皮，没有思想的低端生物体？ 还来嘲笑别人？
你在家也是这么和孩子说话的吗？难怪这么晚还发帖子，没有性生活吧？
我在好多贴都见过你了，早想说说不是？而且我也没骂人，不都是问句吗？你要承认了也是你的选择。
本人在加州，时间尚早，你操心的点可真是典型XXX。
另外劝你收钱发帖就不要这么投入了，咱们的战斗力因为出发点注定差别很大，你这么晚还发帖子，不如看看网红直播意淫一下好了。
让它们自己织造虚幻世界好了
泄露国家机密是要死人的，别人做了这事就要进监狱的。 是不是杀人犯杀过人道个歉就完事了。
我一开始以为但凡有点common sense的人都不会支持Trump，无论你多么讨厌其他候选人。但他居然有粉丝。。。。。。在看完第一场debate之后居然还觉得他赢了而不是觉得他根本严重不靠谱…………………………………………
不过他这半晚上白忙乎了，发的贴都拿不到钱:)
Thomas L. Friedman
SEPT. 27, 2016
My reaction to the Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton debate can be summarized with one word: “How?”
How in the world do we put a man in the Oval Office who thinks NATO is a shopping mall where the tenants aren’t paying enough rent to the U.S. landlord?
NATO is not a shopping mall; it is a strategic alliance that won the Cold War, keeps Europe a stable trading partner for U.S. companies and prevents every European country — particularly Germany — from getting their own nukes to counterbalance Russia, by sheltering them all under America’s nuclear umbrella.
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who does not know enough “beef” about key policies to finish a two-minute answer on any issue without the hamburger helper of bluster, insults and repetition?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who suggests that the recent spate of cyberattacks — which any senior U.S. intelligence official will tell you came without question from Russia — might not have come from Russia but could have been done by “somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds”?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who boasts that he tries to pay zero federal taxes but then complains that our airports and roads are falling apart and there is not enough money for our veterans?
How do we put in the Oval Office a man who claims he was against the Iraq war, because he said he privately told that to his pal Sean Hannity of Fox News — even though he publicly supported the war when it began. Trump is so obsessed with proving his infallibility that he missed scoring an easy debate point for himself by saying, “Yes, I supported the Iraq war as a citizen, but Hillary voted for it as a senator when she had access to the intelligence and her job was to make the right judgment.”
How do we put in the Oval Office someone who says we should not have gone into Iraq, but since we did, “we should have taken the oil — ISIS would not have been able to form … because the oil was their primary source of income.”
...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/28/opinion/trump-how-could-we.html
不知道相信”科学家“的人有没仔细思考一下，就人类提高的那点温度，在大自然面前算什么。
强烈同意，Trump真是史上最衰候选人，Hillary需要一个旗鼓相当的对手，而不是个middle school kid
终于在华人上看到一股清流了! 进来报个到!
Never Trump！
“川普肝胆狭义，为保护那个选美女孩，和另一个泼妇对骂，就代表极至男尊女卑？左x最擅长的伎俩就是以点带面，推而广之，肆意乱贴标签！”
speechless！对于这样的理解力，说对牛弹琴都算是抬举它了