美国近期疫情分析及其对策

L
LingYuan
楼主 (文学城)

On the Analysis and Control of COVID-19 Epidemic Currently in US (Draft)

4/4/2020

Up to 4/4/2020, according to a well-recognized COVID-19 data website <www.point3acres.com>,  US has an accumulated 312,000 diagnosed COVID-19 cases with a daily addition of 34,200 cases. How to effectively control its rapid growth is a currently pressing national issue。

Assessment of Current Situation

Figure 1 depicts the outplay of the epidemic in US gauged with a parameter by the author known as the Daily Increase Ratio (DIR; Please refer to Appendix for its explanation). The outplay can be divided into four stages:

1). From 1/21/2020 when the 1st known case was discovered up to 3/9/2020, designated as Stage I (Natural Propagation Stage),  the epidemic mainly developed at its natural infection rate (DIR about 1.33).

2). On 3/9/2020, on the National News Conference, the virus was downplayed as an equivalency of a flu, and the American Citizens were told that the infection is mainly to the elder population. This coupled with the low number of diagnosed cases at that time (750 cases), created a false complacency in the nation, especially among younger population. This view resulted in a much-increased DIR (1.5) till the announcement of the National Emergency and Practice of Social Distancing (SD) on 3/13/2020. This Stage is designated as the Stage II and termed as The Boosted Stage.  During this stage, the DIR increased consistently day over day from 1.24 to 1.51 till 3/13/2020.

Fig. 1  Epidemic Development Stages in US (up to 4/4/2020)

3). On 3/13/2020, the President announced a National Emergency accompanied with a slew of SD measures. Responding to this policy and practices, the DIR consistently declined to about 1.15 till 3/23/2020 when the SD effect is matured as discussed immediately after. This Stage III is termed as the SD Stage

4). On 3/23/2020, 10 days after the NE announcement, the data suggests that the DIR downward trend changed its course and became much flatter as suggested in the 5 consecutive data points till now at the time of this report writing. This Stage IV is termed as the Stagnation Stage.

It is noted that the benefit of the SD  is substantial. During this period, the DIR reduced by about 0.35. If were no SD, the cases would have amassed to a much higher level at 823,000 cases up to the end of Stage III versus the actual level of 142,700, delivering a welcoming reduction of 680,000 diagnosed cases.  Please note that the real benefit would be much larger since the actually infected population is much greater than the diagnosed one.

What is worrisome and concerning is the currently on-going Stage IV (designated as the Stagnation Stage) which suggests the DIR no longer continued its trend as shown in the SD Stage. The stagnation will cause much concerned larger accumulation since the huge base built up to date. At the time of creating this report (4/4/2020 afternoon), the accumulated case is already stacked up to 310,000 . If were the trend continued from Stage III into Stage IV, we would have had 200,000 cases today instead of 310,000 cases.

To understand the transition from Stage III to Stage IV, the Effective Separation Rate (ESR) is analyzed. ESR is defined as the number of eliminated transmission paths as a percentage of  the number of the transmission paths at a reference state.  The reference state is chosen as the one in Stage I (when people have a “normal” life). A negative rate means more crowded gatherings or clusters and a positive rate indicates the opposite.  It is noted that Stage III traverses 10 days which is about 2 transmission spans (transmission span is the interval between the infected date of a carrier to the date of infecting others, generally 4 to 5 days statistically). Figure 2 shows that after SD practice started, the ESR started to increase day by day to realize its effect. After 10 days, or two transmission spans, the total effect became matured and reached its max at a level about 45% on 3/23/2020. In practice, SD significantly reduced the office gatherings, and the crowds found in the service sectors (such as Gyms, Pubs, Coffee Shops and such) but does not eliminate family clusters, small gatherings (presumably no more than 5), those found in the public transportation vehicles, shopping gatherings, and small groups of street pedestrians as well as found in recreational parks.

 

 

2. What Drives the Current Daily Increases?

Two necessary factors must be in place for an infection to occur: Infection Source and Transmission Path. Out of the 310,000 being diagnosed, a crude estimation suggests a 15 to 30 multiples would have been infected. Even though about 13% of the diagnosed ones are currently hospitalized, a huge amount of carriers are being mobile in the population. Even though through SD, there is a commendable 50% ESR has been created, there is still about 50% transmission pathways being open. Even with the currently reduced DIR of 1.12~ 1.15, when operated on this large base, the a prohibitively large amount of new infections will be generated on a daily basis. When this daily increased carriers added onto the already large base, the following day’s increase will be even larger (until the so called inflection point occurs). For example, on the DIR peak day, when the DIR was 1.51, the daily increase was 4849. While on 4/4/2020, the DIR was 1.12, the daily increase was 34405. A 7 times of daily increase due to the much larger base number. This shows that the current primary driving force of infection is the large base itself.

Although in every possible way, the separation strategy needs to be further enhanced, the emphasis now should be shifted to isolation in order to curb and eventually eliminate the epidemic. This is urgently needed since each day of delay means hundreds of thousands more being infected 

Currently, the large base of carriers mainly drives the daily increases. The strategy should be shifted to the effective isolation of the carriers.

 

3. Suggested Measures to Curb the Current Situation

 

Mobile Care Facilities (MCF)

 

Relative to the massive numbers needed to be isolated, it is suggested that the resources should be strategically allocated according to the severity per localities. For example, the severity can be categorized as National Level Epicenter(s); State Level Epicenter(s); and Town Level Epicenters(s)

Mobile Care Facilities (MCF) should be quickly set up to function as the temporary isolation shelters to provide tending cares for the persons who are infected and presumptively infected. The care centers should be able to provide preventive medical cares (medicines or alternative medicines to prevent from symptom worsening), resting and catering (symptom friendly diet), sanitary facilities (bathing and bathroom); group exercises, regulated schedule (to ensure good sleep and limited use of cell phones to boost immunity).

The Fed, coupled with the juristic State Government should focus their resources on the National Epicenters.

State, coupled with the juristic City Government should  focus their resources on the State Level Epicenters. 

The local town government is responsible for the local situation. School stadiums, YMCA’s, and local churches with readily available shower/bathroom facilities, and kitchens can be converted into MCFs. Currently at the town level, the number is generally on the level of a few hundred. This should be still a manageable quantity at today’s situation. 

 

Appendix

 

k
kentridge
赞。。。请求继续doing the good work
k
kathyzh
看来你是做数据分析的。赞一个。
y
yangyang08
最近几天的D I R很平缓,持续在1.1,缓住了下滑趋势,一直在等拐点
j
johndoe26
专业人士啊,过去几天DIR在1.08 左右
k
k467
正嘀咕你咋不出现了,搞半天做学术去了,太深奥了吧
L
LingYuan
是,最近几天。但是降的太慢了。
L
LingYuan
没有,和当地政府联系。

美国官僚太严重了,耽误时间。每天增3万 耽误3天就是10万。没人着急。

L
LingYuan
一点也不深奥,很简单的
L
LingYuan
确实是 降的太慢了。
L
LingYuan
好的,共同努力
L
LingYuan
不是,就是很焦急,至少可以把情况给大家理顺一下。知情也是抗役
t
travelprofuns
或许政府呼吁被感染者主动去隔离所,但被感染者还是有权拒绝的

西方人权自由,比较难办。 可能政府派出志愿者和护士保障受感染者的生活比较可行。 

美国肯定不缺志愿者。 志愿者受培训后有设备保障到受感染者家中照顾病人比较好。  

当然病人自愿去隔离场所集中管理是最好的。

p
pickshell
其对策有点类似国内方舱做法,但是美国做到这些,现在几乎不大可能。。
L
LingYuan
如果条件好,也许人愿意去呢,饭食好,有人照顾,大家在一起像SUPPORT GROUP是的,领着锻炼跳舞。。。

如果有一半人去,也解决大问题。

L
LingYuan
“可能政府派出志愿者和护士保障受感染者的生活比较可行。 “ 也是好主意。
L
LingYuan
为什么不行呢?
5
5678910
怎么不讲中文了?英文读这费劲
L
LingYuan
对不起,给当地政府递i的呈子,用鹰文写的。。。
O
OceanSound
这英文水平,比大多数英文为母语的人都好。
t
travelprofuns
政府完全可以租用旅馆和学生宿舍隔离轻症患者和轻重症出院者

中国的方舱医院是没有办法的办法。 美国的条件比中国强太多:) 中国的话是武汉旅馆需要提供给外来滞留人员和医护人员。 美国有的是空闲旅馆。 当然要旅馆老板同意。 这个问题也不大。

另外除了大城市贫民区和超大城市公寓,美国大多数人都是一家一户(空调系统),除了家人很难传染别人。

另外美国人比较自觉,只要保证患者和直接接触者(比如家人或照顾者)有足够的防护用品,如防护衣,口罩,护目镜,清洁剂等。 他们都会严格执行。 

将来可能问题最大的是大城市贫民区,大多数人饭都吃不上房租交不起, 生存第一, 他们是需要特别注意的。

g
gladys
希望政府采纳您的建议
j
julie116
你要找个在这个问题上损失惨重但是有社会地位的群体去lobby. 当然还得有点相关的credit
p
pickshell
检测,隔离 和住院条件等做不到应收尽收。
d
dreamsweetdream
只有科学清醒的头脑才能解决问题.谢谢你的分析和分享!
e
ephd
看来我和大家伙的估摸有点类似,美国的拐点应该在5月1号附近
B
BeagleDog
我现在华州的King County。 你文中的 2. What Drives the Current Daily Increas

很fit我们county的情况。虽然二月底因为nursing home 疫情爆发,这里就开始出现死亡病例,但州政府主要把精力放在保护弱势群体上,例如,如何保护nursing home,如何保证贫困学生的免费午餐,怎么安置homeless,等等。居家令是3/23才下的。我们是真着急。现在居家令已经实行两周有余,每天看着county的确诊病例还是增长的很多。这两天,听到救护车的声音好像比前两天还多了。虽然现在华州和其他热点州相比不算太糟糕,我个人觉得只是因为人口密度比较低而已。

现在州里还是不检测轻症患者。州里说,检测出来也是在家隔离。那这些人自己都不知道是不是covid-19,又怎么会隔离?所以就有大量的带病毒的人在各处遊走。现在几个疫情严重的counties都准备了隔离点,可能是从医院出来的人可以去吧。我感觉主要是给穷人提供帮助,因为没像方舱那样大,容不了多少人。

L
LingYuan
您提供的情况很有代表性,谢谢! 这就是问题的症结所在。现在的方法是治末不治本的方法,或是盲人摸象,没抓住根本。

FAUCI和TRUMP太老了,脑子不够用,魄力也不够。

L
LingYuan
有可能啊,时间拖得太长了,会造成巨大的损失
L
LingYuan
谢谢你的评论,确实是,相信科学,尊重事实是解决问题的根本。
B
BeagleDog
其实还有更可怕的。从华州州长的话中,我已听出要逐渐open smallbusiness了。现在华州天气渐暖,太阳也在一个冬天后又

出来了,大家就更是在家呆不住了。只怕会前功尽弃。

L
LingYuan
建议你与你当地议员联系,表示你的担心,有理有据地表明利害关系。

你说的有道理,是TRADE OFF,是图一时的眼前利益还是长远的大局利益。

L
LingYuan
谢谢, 没有来得及逐字逐句地润色, 不过感觉还读得通.