Trump accuses Harvard of ‘judge shopping’ and threatens to send $3 billion of its federal grants to trade schools
Trump in his Monday post also took aim at the bipartisan practice of “judge shopping,” where plaintiffs file cases outside their obvious court of jurisdiction in an effort to be assigned a judge who may have a more favorable review of the litigation compared to a random assignment. Members of both parties have used the practice to further their policy goals.
DEI as implemented at Harvard is a political advocacy movement that advocates and executes on behalf of certain groups that are deemed oppressed under the DEI methodology. Under DEI, one’s degree of oppression is determined based upon where one resides on a so-called intersectional pyramid of oppression where whites, Jews, and Asians are deemed oppressors, and a subset of people of color, LGBTQ people, and/or women are deemed to be oppressed. Under DEI’s ideology, any policy, program, educational system, economic system, grading system, admission policy, (and even climate change due its disparate impact on geographies and the people that live there), etc. that leads to unequal outcomes among people of different skin colors is deemed racist. As a result, according to DEI, capitalism is racist, Advanced Placement exams are racist, IQ tests are racist, corporations are racist, or in other words, any merit-based program, system, or organization which has or generates outcomes for different races that are at variance with the proportion these races represent in the population at large is by definition racist under DEI’s ideology.
Trump accuses Harvard of ‘judge shopping’ and threatens to send $3 billion of its federal grants to trade schools
Trump in his Monday post also took aim at the bipartisan practice of “judge shopping,” where plaintiffs file cases outside their obvious court of jurisdiction in an effort to be assigned a judge who may have a more favorable review of the litigation compared to a random assignment. Members of both parties have used the practice to further their policy goals.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/26/us/trump-harvard-judge-shopping-federal-grants
就是delusional。
所有的削球手最後都是一個結局 被拍死
只能是無語了
有一轮明月哈
我们这牛娃，哈佛 vs.MIT, 都选了MIT。用点common sense, DEI是反智的。可以有少量的programs照顾后进困难家庭和种族，但主体必须是merit-based, 这个国家才有希望。
不然你去讓CB禁止SAT用計算機啊
delusional
马丁路德金说不要用肤色来看待人，而用内在。这就是Merit Based
现在极左搞DEI是按肤色搞不同对待。
真不知道H都惨成这样了，可能不知道的都有妄想症
DEI as implemented at Harvard is a political advocacy movement that advocates and executes on behalf of certain groups that are deemed oppressed under the DEI methodology. Under DEI, one’s degree of oppression is determined based upon where one resides on a so-called intersectional pyramid of oppression where whites, Jews, and Asians are deemed oppressors, and a subset of people of color, LGBTQ people, and/or women are deemed to be oppressed. Under DEI’s ideology, any policy, program, educational system, economic system, grading system, admission policy, (and even climate change due its disparate impact on geographies and the people that live there), etc. that leads to unequal outcomes among people of different skin colors is deemed racist. As a result, according to DEI, capitalism is racist, Advanced Placement exams are racist, IQ tests are racist, corporations are racist, or in other words, any merit-based program, system, or organization which has or generates outcomes for different races that are at variance with the proportion these races represent in the population at large is by definition racist under DEI’s ideology.
你说你没申请哈佛只申请MIT因为是DEI还好理解一些
是明摆着的一个荒谬的事实，类似当年文化大革命
的STEM孩子去H选偏文的课,没兴趣,也基本是自找不自在.H去M选课的孩子倒是颇有些.
H的 general education (GenEd) and divisional distribution requirements,要求大量的读写, 对偏STEM文科不是太擅长的孩子可能有些过于挑战了.即使H最基本的英文写作必修课,对过度偏STEM的孩子,包括入了H的,可能都不轻松.
杀鸡儆猴,逼着普罗大众跟自己站在一起.平民百姓,天然心向当年的民主党.于是台面上的左派就按照吩咐往左挪,直到挪到天怒人怨的极左,然后善良的民众就自然而然投入大老板的怀抱,还以为自己做出了最正确的选择.LOL.