1.People face trade offs ，Trade Off involved with giving up one aspects or quantity for something in return of aspects and quantity.
“There is no such thing as a free lunch. Making decisions requires trading one goal for another. Examples include how students spend their time, how a family decides to spend its income,
2. The cost of something is what you give up to get it
Because people face trade-offs, making decisions requires comparing the costs and benefits of alternative courses of action When making any decision, decision makers should consider the opportunity costs of each individual possibility. 3. Rational people think at the margin Many decisions in life involve incremental decisions: Should I remain in school this semester? Should I take another course this semester? Should I study an additional hour for tomorrow's exam? Rational people often make decisions by comparing marginal benefits and marginal costs. 4. People respond to incentives
也可能是真性情！
🔥 最新回帖
QB, 这种背景对融入T10可能都有些难度，尤其是P/M这类更看学业的地儿，四下不着落
🛋️ 沙发板凳
能厮杀千军万马走过独木桥的亚裔娃，都是各个高中的佼佼者，听起来大部分都是四年鼓足了劲儿以进名校为目的。进去又喝同样类似的孩子玩同样的厮杀游戏。。。
太多的优秀的小中男进不去
进的，变小鱼的概率更大一些。
How People Make Decisions
1.People face trade offs ，Trade Off involved with giving up one aspects or quantity for something in return of aspects and quantity.
“There is no such thing as a free lunch. Making decisions requires trading one goal for another. Examples include how students spend their time, how a family decides to spend its income,2. The cost of something is what you give up to get it
Because people face trade-offs, making decisions requires comparing the costs and benefits of alternative courses of action When making any decision, decision makers should consider the opportunity costs of each individual possibility. 3. Rational people think at the margin Many decisions in life involve incremental decisions: Should I remain in school this semester? Should I take another course this semester? Should I study an additional hour for tomorrow's exam? Rational people often make decisions by comparing marginal benefits and marginal costs. 4. People respond to incentives还像GTech大一就要公司来开job fair招人，专门找CS。 耶鲁还要自己找。当然这个孩子是个牛蛙，还几个O，肯定比进GTech 的平均要厉害很多。我猜公司就想找个拖地的，不想找个想当领导的
你们说说？
几个O基本没啥毛用。 CS有Creative的一面，在这一面有成就的， 就很抢手。
Yale的CS大概去金融机构还是有门路。可惜金融公司拿奖金， 比不上大科技公司拿估值。
用康保底就行了。
最适合了，假如不介意天气。
做父母的(算我一个)都快成祥林嫂了。LOL
18岁之后我慢慢放手了，任何决定不会强迫，会建议但不强求。
就没人信哈
pursuit。
本质还是以扫地为目的的。可惜了，确实不应该上耶鲁。上个CMU会开心一些。
从未听他们说过P的学业压力有多大。
T5 啊， 东西跪的都起不来了
这个周末闺女在联赛地见到伯克利大一的过去队友，就是那个学化工premed的。俩人长谈很久，她给闺女讲了很多学校里的歌喉风气以及学生之间相互竞争的丑陋行为。
CMU，UCB 这个级别的，反馈都不好。
私立比例低不少。
整体比S在加州比例低。
州大的Top3%也能在名校立脚的
错得离谱的也不管。
不光纽约的长岛， 在新泽西麻省都是一样， 想上常青藤， 没有特别出色的， 那么就是Cornell的可能性最大。其他的州不好说。
Cornell招的人也差不多是常青藤8院校里最多的。
大学里的压力主要来自学业。几场考试下来顿见分晓。
越是名校的孩子情商越高。按理说心理承受能力也很强。但是。那些不是靠自身学习优秀或通过各种课外辅导班或各科私教提高学习成绩的，到了名校卷不动了，想不忧郁都难。
参加儿子高中的第一次家长会，有一个白人爸爸就跟我说早就给他儿子找好了各科的私教。儿子也跟我说他所认识的同学里除了他都有私教。他在家的时候每次考试前都看他在辅导他同学写作业和准备考试。
学业躺赢的才不会有什么压力。
我们要搬过去！
但私立并不容易。
其次看着容易也是因为工学院和建筑酒店是self select，所以录取率高，打枣的少。
把这两个因素考虑进去，录取率不比别的中小疼高多少。
别的疼文科占比例大多了，所有人都可以打枣，所以录取率低，康私立能打的就一个CAS。eng 建筑酒店打枣少多了。
肯定容易不少