Q: In US, a driver angry with another car in front of it and proposely slow down will be charged?
A: From ChatGPT I am not a lawyer, but I can provide some general information about road rage incidents in the United States. It's important to note that laws can vary by state, so it's always best to consult with a legal professional or refer to the specific laws in your jurisdiction for accurate and up-to-date information.
Engaging in aggressive or reckless behavior while driving, such as intentionally slowing down or impeding another vehicle out of anger, can potentially lead to legal consequences. Road rage incidents can escalate quickly and may result in charges, depending on the circumstances and applicable laws.
Some actions that could potentially result in charges related to road rage include:
Reckless Driving: If a driver's behavior is considered to be endangering others on the road, such as by intentionally slowing down to create a hazardous situation, they may be charged with reckless driving. Following Too Closely: If a driver intentionally tailgates or follows another vehicle too closely as a form of aggression, they could be charged with a "following too closely" offense. Harassment or Intimidation: If a driver engages in aggressive behavior, such as repeatedly honking, flashing headlights, or making threatening gestures, they could be charged with harassment or intimidation. Assault: In extreme cases where a physical altercation or threat of physical harm occurs, the driver could face charges related to assault.
It's important to remember that road rage incidents can have serious consequences, both legally and for the safety of everyone involved. It is always best to prioritize safety, remain calm, and avoid engaging in aggressive behaviors while driving. If you encounter a situation where you feel threatened or unsafe on the road, it's recommended to contact the appropriate authorities or law enforcement to report the incident.
https://www.toutiao.com/video/7237054083805217340/
白车要并线回来时，黑车刹车阻止。明显故意置人于死地。
行径令人发指。但并不属于蓄谋，10年徒刑很合理。咋就匪夷所思了
要加速要刹车都不违法，让你是人情不让你不犯罪，错的是同向的SUV不会再减速躲在黒车后面反而朝来车转过去，另外气囊在这种车速下应该能救他一命，如果这车安全性过关的话。
故意减速置人于死地。令人发指
Q: In US, a driver angry with another car in front of it and proposely slow down will be charged?
A: From ChatGPT
I am not a lawyer, but I can provide some general information about road rage incidents in the United States. It's important to note that laws can vary by state, so it's always best to consult with a legal professional or refer to the specific laws in your jurisdiction for accurate and up-to-date information.
Engaging in aggressive or reckless behavior while driving, such as intentionally slowing down or impeding another vehicle out of anger, can potentially lead to legal consequences. Road rage incidents can escalate quickly and may result in charges, depending on the circumstances and applicable laws.
Some actions that could potentially result in charges related to road rage include:
Reckless Driving: If a driver's behavior is considered to be endangering others on the road, such as by intentionally slowing down to create a hazardous situation, they may be charged with reckless driving. Following Too Closely: If a driver intentionally tailgates or follows another vehicle too closely as a form of aggression, they could be charged with a "following too closely" offense. Harassment or Intimidation: If a driver engages in aggressive behavior, such as repeatedly honking, flashing headlights, or making threatening gestures, they could be charged with harassment or intimidation. Assault: In extreme cases where a physical altercation or threat of physical harm occurs, the driver could face charges related to assault.It's important to remember that road rage incidents can have serious consequences, both legally and for the safety of everyone involved. It is always best to prioritize safety, remain calm, and avoid engaging in aggressive behaviors while driving. If you encounter a situation where you feel threatened or unsafe on the road, it's recommended to contact the appropriate authorities or law enforcement to report the incident.
法庭会相信这种诡辩吗？
诡辩与否看你律师，打官司在对方看来每句话都是诡辨。
老实说黑车就该一枪给毙了以杜绝路怒。
对面的白车也不会往右边路边开躲着点，要是在这里远远的就一早开路边去了。
所以回去要开就只能开坦克。
为黑白二车驾驶辩护的，恐怕都是为自己辩护。
小心自己再次犯路怒，走上不归路。
从视频上看来他们没有defensive driving 的概念，只有得理不饶人的立场，不然对面的白车应该往边上躲躲。
撇开路权不管。录像里，凶手白车根本没有想要急刹车。即使看到了对面有车，还要强行超车。即使是最后时刻，才点了一下刹车，也没有把刹车踩到底。即使要撞了，却是采取回避动作。即使是回避动作，也不向右边同方向回避，而是选最最危险的迎头对撞。白车有许多可以自救的动作，却偏偏要往死路上奔。绝对是自作自受。
黑车如果能计算证明，假如不踩刹车，而是放开油门做惯性直线运动，黑车不刹车不撞黑车也没有可能回到右道即可脱罪。因为无论黑车主观如何，客观条件不可能让白车有活路。
估计飙车的2车都大大超速了。
最后要问，为什么不能撞黑车，而要迎头撞对面的车？
按现在这个判案逻辑，是不是对面白车不刹车不回避也有罪？
据说第一批买摩托的大部分都死了。看过一照片，胡同里出来摩托加速，一头撞在胡同外路边停着的一卡车尾部，摩托手当场死亡。
按交通法规，这种道超车的安全责任完全在超车的车子，虚线可以超车，但是只有两条车道。黑车不让完全合法。
居然还在纠缠什么路权？这是刑事案！
漂亮国纽约，违章过马路的行人多了去了。有路权的司机去撞死他们吗？
他不是第三者中立，而是当事人之一。有罪，他才有赔偿。
这里的法律是保护行人，这里的弱者。法律是这样说的：你有路权，但有足够的时间让行人，你必须让没有路权的行人。如果行人侵犯你的路权，而没有让你有足够的时间，距离停下来，你没有任何责任。如果上法庭，则由陪审团决定。
同意，故意是很难决定的。要由陪审团决定。
车后角让人横向撞过来就最容易甩尾，最可能的是白车突然发现要撞到黒车慌了赶紧打左舵。
白车是被前面发生的路怒冲昏了头脑，加之处置失当，白送了性命，连带对向白车遭灾，当然对向白车也是处置不当，但责任不在他
自己活命的空间