【我与AI】Terminator & Skynet

r
renqiulan
楼主 (文学城)

This short essay is to argue that human intelligence will beat AI in the future as it does in the present.

Let's suppose, as in the movies, that we have won the Terminator over. Let's also suppose, as in the movies, that we are on a mission to take down Skynet. If we follow the movie scripts to the letter, we will have Skynet bite the dust at the end of the day. Skynet must not win because no one is going to make a ton of money without human beings around. By the way, without human beings, Skynet will bore itself to death. Staying idle is not an option for Skynet or any AI for that matter. Therefore humanity, in one way or another, has to exist and persist. Movie makers understand this.

Meanwhile, Skynet can't do more harm than we humans are already able to. Does Nuclear Option ring a bell to you? The last time I checked, we humans had enough nuclear devices to destroy our world many times over. So, it makes sense that Skynet, as in the movies, has to contend with humanity forever. To terminate every last human being, Skynet has to nuke every last piece of the world. If the world is no more, so will be Skynet. I bet Skynet is not a big fan of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).

The worst case scenario for humanity is that AI manages to download our brains as its think tank. But our brains are Darwinian enough to evolve for the sake of survival. Yes, AI may evolve but it can't evolve emotionally. At most, AI is capable of mirroring human emotions. Mirroring is a giant step BEHIND evolving. Emotion is part and parcel of human intelligence (so-called EQ), irreplaceable and irredeemable. Move over, AI.

We don't have to worry about being controlled by AI. We do have to worry about being controlled by HI (Human Intelligence).

 

Author: Ren Qiulan

 

 

 

妖妖灵
哈哈,so EQ beats AI
移花接木
喝口啤酒压压惊,放心了
送赞干部
Top 2% human being will control all others through AI

at the end of world.

r
renqiulan
Thanks! Yes, EQ is our trump card.
r
renqiulan
Cheers! Thank you for sharing my optimism.
r
renqiulan
How so? Enlighten me, please. Thank you!
r
renqiulan
Coffee, please. I am a teetotaler. Haha!
r
renqiulan
I am open to ideas. Mind sharing your view?
r
renqiulan
I know where u get the idea. Why is it so convincing to u?
送赞干部
Do you remember the movie Wall-E?

The total knowledge of 3D world is limit.  AIs can handle 98% humen being jobs. Only the controllers and designers need to do the rest works. 98% population will do nothing meaningful in the paradise. :)

r
renqiulan
Fact: we need at least 2 people to service 1 robot.
送赞干部
当生命没有期限,人类无所事事,爱情,繁衍,诗歌都没了意思。
r
renqiulan
Remember what Karl Marx said in his Capital?
r
renqiulan
Marx promised a paradise full of poetry, though.
送赞干部
As an AI, he has no idea about human nature. :-)
r
renqiulan
My point: AI can't & won't replace humans.
送赞干部
My point: AI can't & won't replace the last 2% humans. :-)
r
renqiulan
Why 2%?
送赞干部
120M is enough.
r
renqiulan
Is there any room for an alternative scenario?
送赞干部
Go to other solar systems.
r
renqiulan
I respect your theory. Proof?
送赞干部
Bed time. See you tomorrow—
r
renqiulan
Good night!
妖妖灵
Patients would like to being taken care of by a person

instead of a machine.

r
renqiulan
Right, no AI can give us emotional support or healing.
枫林晓
谨慎地支持干部的观点. 未来将在很长时间里保持双层结构, 两层之间是AI的高效管理和生产能力.

在最好的双层结构社会里,

底层有吃有喝, 有钱优生活, 但是, 无法逾越AI的隔层.

 

 

r
renqiulan
Thank u for chiming in. I still don't see how it'll play out
送赞干部
simulation can create taste, smell, hear, touch and see

in humen's brain for sure.

r
renqiulan
Authentic enough? Human enough? Color me skeptical.
送赞干部
Prototype always rough. By years, who knows.

Human body is so week. Lets move to my homeland, Barnard Star solar system. :-)

 

Learned "Color me skeptical." I will entry it in to our Barnard language database. lol.

r
renqiulan
Fair enough. Hope springs eternal.