How a Patient educated his Doctor

r
renqiulan
楼主 (文学城)

One day a 65-year-old gentleman let his young physician know that he came for his annual check-up for the last time. Calming the puzzled guy in a white coat with his soothing voice, the senior citizen had the following to say:

 

"Look, I neither drink nor smoke. Weather permitting, I'll take a long walk, for fresh air if nothing else. I am doing okay. I have no use for this routine visit. Let me come only when I need to. I mean no offense to you or your profession. By the way, I'll keep my Medicare which I earned."

 

The young doctor walked the senior citizen all the way to his car, wishing him all the best. Then he made a quick search on his smart phone. Here's what he found:

In a 1914 landmark case regarding the patient's informed consent, Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo affirmed that "every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body."

 

Now a seasoned MD, the dignified mentor always makes sure that all the rookies under him listen to their patients non-judgmentally.

 

by renqiulan 

 

Google Image

妖妖灵
Patients are always the best teachers for doctors.
妖妖灵
But patients need to take doctors' suggestions seriously as
妖妖灵
patients who r against medical advice might lose their lives
r
renqiulan
I can't agree more.
r
renqiulan
Meanwhile, the patient's rights have to be respected.
r
renqiulan
Honesty is the best policy. The final decision is the

patient's, though.

妖妖灵
Of course. Especially in the US,
妖妖灵
Doctors r professional & they have guidelines to manage pts.
r
renqiulan
The elephant in the room is TIME PRESSURE.
妖妖灵
Good patient-doctor relationship can reduce lawsuit signific

significantly. To make patient satisfied is very important. 

妖妖灵
Happy patients, happy doctors. :)
妖妖灵
请教:减少病人的lawsuit 英文怎么表达比较好?:)
妖妖灵
和你学了“The elephant in the room”,真好,谢谢:)
r
renqiulan
"How to reduce the risk of being sued for malpractice?"
r
renqiulan
Not a problem.
r
renqiulan
Meticulous documentation is a must, I think.
r
renqiulan
Few and far between, I am afraid.
妖妖灵
Good point!Thanks!
妖妖灵
Sure.
j
jianchi9090
平静死去比满身插管死去强。
j
jianchi9090
但是一个可以输血就治疗得好的病人,由于宗教原因拒绝输血,医生看来是愚蠢。所以医生也就守本分就好。人都是命。
妖妖灵
这是医生必须尊重病人的很好的例子,其实基本上,任何治疗都需要得到病人的许可的
r
renqiulan
That's why a living will or an advance directive makes sense
r
renqiulan
Frankly, medicine can only do so much.
妖妖灵
病人晕倒血压下降意识丧失,紧急心脏放了支架,把病人从死亡线上拉回来,然后病人一切恢复正常。这就是医学啊。
r
renqiulan
I won't debate that because that is true.Medical science has

its limit and its potential. That is also a fact. The vast majority of medical practitioners, needless to say, are doing their best. They save their patients. They lose their patients. They are human. They make success stories as well as mistakes. When it comes to pandemics, public policies matter more than individual medical professionals. Free and open information, for example, will get you an informed public. An informed public will be better prepared than an ill-informed one. All good doctors are good communicators. Good communicators tend to attract good listeners. Good listeners tend to be more understanding, more rational, and more responsible for their informed consent. Of course, it is easier said than done.

j
jianchi9090
想起最近的事情,建议一个人去体检,由于从他的叙述,从医学角度有潜在疾病可能,但也有可能没事,所以没事的时候他会觉得乌鸦嘴

不会感谢未雨绸缪。真有事,早一脸倒霉的去处理了,更不会觉得你的好意。学医和不学医有巨大的知识壕沟,作为病人不能接受医生建议,就要有信命的觉悟。作为医生,要有别人的命是他自己的觉悟,切忌带入太深。 国内上大多的医疗检查,被说是过度治疗。如果为了给病人省钱,漏诊是要被打杀的白衣杀手。无论救了多少人,一个错就是错。所以人人都在站在自己立场说话。 包括我现在也不知道自己想说什么,大约一切都是命吧。

r
renqiulan
文友所说的都是十分接地气的话。对心智正常的人而言,行使自主权即是承担后果,所以要簽名为证。这也是契约法的精神。