Cast in the light friendliest to Tesla, you could argue that returning control to a human operator makes sense whenever any automated control system detects circumstances beyond its ability to handle. But FSD effectively saying "It's all yours, bud" 500 ms before certain impact feels more like an attempt to create legal confusion that favors Tesla in liability lawsuits.
他的试验不难做，Tesla fans出钱用FSD做一遍不就行了。DOGE把NHTSA的专家裁了。I wonder why ...
https://electrek.co/2025/03/17/tesla-fans-exposes-shadiness-defend-autopilot-crash/
In NHTSA’s investigation of Tesla vehicles on Autopilot crashing into emergency vehicles on the highway, the safety agency found that Autopilot would disengage within less than one second prior to impact on average in the crashes that it was investigating:
This would suggest that the ADAS system detected the collision but too late and disengaged the system instead of applying the brakes.
Top comment by Mike Liked by 34 peopleCast in the light friendliest to Tesla, you could argue that returning control to a human operator makes sense whenever any automated control system detects circumstances beyond its ability to handle. But FSD effectively saying "It's all yours, bud" 500 ms before certain impact feels more like an attempt to create legal confusion that favors Tesla in liability lawsuits.
https://x.com/alexfinnx/status/1901772751423373476?s=46
As it said: Reputation takes years to build, second to be destroyed.
没有LiDAR但用radar的车都应该能避免这种crash
https://x.com/amitisinvesting/status/1901665455384776869?s=46