As Boeing's first CEO without a background in aviation, he made the decision to upgrade the 737 series to 737 MAX instead of developing a new model.[5][14] According to the Seattle Times, McNerney made the decision to "establish[] a plant in North Charleston, S.C., attempting to bust Puget Sound unions — who were responsible for saving the much-delayed airliner. Later all Dreamliners assembly shifted there, where there have been ongoing production flaws." [15]
我们今天的工作日，工作时限制。。好像是工会争取来的
大家享用
that said, if management can absorb 35% salary growth, they must have ignored employees foe a long time.
couldnot tour the factory last time threr due to the strike
Is this management? No, that was Seattle union...
Musk，Huang，Jobs，做公司都是看趋势积极发展新产品。MS到Balmer一个MBA手里，就坏掉了，后来还是找了工程师当家菜转回来。
波音的问题是两个CEO之前是MBA当家，现在的败局由那个时候开始，MBA就知道玩spreadsheet，数字高于创新。737Max的决定就是MBA总裁做的，因为比开发新机型省钱。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_McNerney 2005-2015
As Boeing's first CEO without a background in aviation, he made the decision to upgrade the 737 series to 737 MAX instead of developing a new model.[5][14] According to the Seattle Times, McNerney made the decision to "establish[] a plant in North Charleston, S.C., attempting to bust Puget Sound unions — who were responsible for saving the much-delayed airliner. Later all Dreamliners assembly shifted there, where there have been ongoing production flaws." [15]
所以出现一系列奇葩的决策，做了若干回报低的烧钱项目。有人说美国上市公司比外国强，值更高的估值，我只能摇头。
毫无疑问，没有工会，不管是现在还是过去，资本家为节省成本，什么干不出？
有了工会，资本家要考虑节约成本带来的副作用，这成本会超过预计的节约成本。
工会不是傻瓜，当然会用副作用的成本来制约资本家。
目前，由于政府的干涉，资本家单方面节约成本已经受到约束，比如最低工资法。
工会还需存在吗？还需要各行各业都需要吗？就像战争，罢工双方都会有损失。个人有自己的看法。
华人大多是打工的，但并不是讲要无条件支持工会的，除非你是工会会员。
身份决定立场。我的主张是双方见好就收，需要大智慧。