过去的15年只是一个”massive QE + Deficit Spending" cycle 的前半程而已

n
njrookie
楼主 (文学城)

and the cycle is still on-going. If we start counting from 2008 GFC, we are at the end of easing cycle and the 2nd half of the same cycle just got started. I say it will take another 10 yrs to see the full impact of massive Fed balance sheet unwinding as well as the impact of massive increase in Federal debt level.

Yet for many investors, the 1/2 cycle which lasted 15 yrs were the ENTIRE life span for stock  market investment. human beings are known to project personal immediate past experience into distant future. and human beings also tend to attribute personal sucess to personal skills, and personal failure to bad luck. For equity investment, luck, good or bad, is frequently far more likely than skills in determing the outcome

entry point determines a big part of your investment outcome. it is easy to use 10-, 20- or even 50-yr avg return for projection. 

1 first simple mean return is subject to "volatility drag". for the minimum use LONG term CAGR; (data from yahoo finance historical price)

2 can one sit tight thru 2000-2002? if you held thru it, you only lost 80%. So congrats! You still have 20% Left and it took more than a decade to recover the loss from 2000 high. If you BTDF, you would have been entirely wiped out and would NOT participate in the bounce and recovery. it is one thing to talk about what you will do. it is entirely a differnt thing to sit through an 80% DD. 20% is the max I can sit without questioning my investment thesis and even my personal merits.

 

3 equity mkt, tech in particular, is MORE expensive today in terms of valution multiples even tho the index is below ATH. why? riskfree rate much higher. So stocks are NOT cheaper. It is more expensive. To expect past return, you need another 15-year QE and massive fiscal deficit spending. The Q is can we afford it?

 

Hindsight is 20/20. So the million dollar Q finally: does this look like i bottom; ii peak; iii decent pricing in your eyes?

陈默
刚给您给居士的跟帖点赞,正想建议您单开一帖~谢谢分享。
n
njrookie
我相信他投资成绩,非常棒!就是提醒大家一下
y
yangyang08
我也相信他的回报率,因为和我401 K里面的基金接近
陈默
您的补充很好,很多知识点。居士迄今的投资成绩很亮眼,也很可信。工作稳定的双职工家庭,

这20年来,只要顶住了几次腰斩,没退场,并坚持定投,其实自己现在回头看看都相当不错。当然居士特别坚持,力度也大,成绩更亮眼也是自然。

我们老留都到了中年或者即将跨入老年,现在想想如何把自己辛苦工作和投资攒下的资产合理利用,达到养老优质化和家庭利益最大化,是很有必要的。从这个层面说,大家的分享,不论投资房产还是股票还是其他,不论是成绩还是经验还是教训,都很有意义。

s
samma1
非常理性的分析, 学习了
Z
ZeroSumGame
写的好
C
CatcherInTheRye
是的,我2000年都归零了,收入还没他高,现在都差不多了

他现在的11m是可信的。是往后的projection非常不可能。他不知道他到目前正好经历了美国投资史上最好的20年。

g
gccard
最近15年,不管是定投股市还是房市,回报率都高,未来难以维持
越王剑
如果预测未来股市的回报,我认为以每年8-10%

比较reasonable. 15%过高。

螺丝螺帽
归零?我有一笔最早的IRA, 2003年, 从3万开始, 选的保守基金, 到过5.3万。 低过2.8万, 现在11万

前十几年, 没动过, 最近调整了一下

人言可畏
喜欢你的笔名,没读过这本书,希望你能讲讲感想。
n
njrookie
nominal return hard to predict。 real return of 4-5% is super
m
mobius
多谢分析. 还是要time the market?

都说fed要降息. 下个boom cycle 开始了?

y
yangyang08
这已经很不错了,投资房也有名义增长和除去inflation的增长
n
njrookie
你还是没法接受拿到high single digit回报就已经很好了
m
mobius
穷, 贪, 胆小

Single digit, 没法退休啊.

s
start2020
00年1米spy现在约4米,09年的现在约5米。说不timing,只是像我这样的无法驾驭而已
n
njrookie
想要找到一个能够赚到20%的稳定赚钱方式,需要大量的心血和起伏。其实就是一个有自己edge的生意。定投的结果就是平均回报
n
njrookie
对99%人而言,timing的结果是underperform market。意识到这点需要十年。原因就是我帖子里说的

self attribution bias

 

s
start2020
我是100%谢谢你的提醒。2千年前有近25年的大牛市,2千年后有近12年的修正平盘。从09年地点我们走过了14年的牛市。

还要多久我们才能再到sideway. sideway 会有多久?20上半世纪,sideway 会有二十年左右,上升期会比下半世纪短的多。

b
bobpainting
感谢感谢!太棒了。我存下来消化一下这些分析!
b
bobpainting
你这个也很牛得投资!感谢分享!
g
goingplaces
Long term chart a double top is very obvious. Isn’t it?