More than half of Americans want stricter gun laws: poll BY MONIQUE BEALS - 05/25/22 2:31 PM ET SHARETWEET
A poll conducted between the mass shootings that took place this month in Buffalo, N.Y., and Uvalde, Texas, found that over half of Americans supported making gun violence laws more strict.
Fifty-four percent of Americans surveyed in a CBS News-YouGov poll out Wednesday said they would like to see stricter laws regulating the sale of guns. Another 30 percent said they wanted gun laws to remain the same, and 16 percent said they wanted gun laws to be less strict.
The poll showed that beliefs regarding such laws differed across party affiliation, with 79 percent of Democrats surveyed favoring stricter gun sale laws, compared to 27 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of independents.
Meanwhile 9 percent of Democrats pooled, 24 percent of Republicans and 17 percent of independents said they wanted less strict gun sale laws.
The largest portion of Republicans polled, 49 percent, said they wanted gun sale laws to remain the same, along with 33 percent of independents and 12 percent of Democrats, according to the poll.
The survey was conducted between May 18 and May 20 and included a sample of 2,041 U.S. adults. It has a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.
The interviews with respondents occurred just days before Tuesday’s brutal shooting in Texas left 19 elementary school students and two teachers dead.
Since the attack, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has begun the process of getting two bills that would expand and strengthen background check requirements for gun sales on the Senate’s legislative calendar
Both bills passed the House last year. Gun control measures face an uphill battle in the evenly split Senate, however. Most legislation requires 60 votes in the upper chamber to overcome a filibuster, and Republicans have not shown support for implementing new limits on the sale or ownership of firearms.
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) has also said that one of the bills passed by the House, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021 or H.R. 8, is too far-reaching.
Manchin has instead pushed for a narrower plan that exempts transfers and sales between family and friends, a proposal he negotiated with input from the National Rifle Association (NRA) in 2013.
最近美国的枪击案件似乎非常频繁,不知道是不是媒体导向的问题,但终归无可忽略的结论,就是这个世界,至少我们所处的美国,越来越乱!
不得不说,每次悲剧发生后,媒体及某些政客的表现,甚至给人一种亢奋的印象。多数声音好像异口同声在强调,早就说过了吧,现在又被我说中了吧?!而这些人所给出的理想描绘,简单来说,就是一个没有枪的,无处不平等,无人不饱暖的太平天国美利坚。
这其实看起来好像是并不陌生的套路。记得曾经为了保护环境这个最崇高的目标,就可以抬高油价,资助普京;好比为了保护X主席,就可以理直气壮地凌辱殴打教授,直到他们跳楼,等等等等;现在为了禁枪,当然可以再掀浪潮,逼美国人买枪的同时,再让军火商赚个钵满盆盈。这里枪手忍不住要调侃一句,疯子用枪杀人,所以政府应该禁绝守法公民的枪支,那如果以后出现性侵女性罪犯,会不会要求全民葵花宝典?
关于禁枪的话题,枪手以前有过不少的呼吁,也许自己觉得很有道理,但是站在局外的立场设身处地,也可以说是个人的思想。那么今天改变一下思路,这里不谈情感,只讲真象。
真相之一,民间枪支在美国不可能清零!
如果各位都平心静气,抛开那些不切实际加上蛮不讲理的幻想,很自然就能得出结论,美国不可能禁枪。从第一批狩猎垦荒的开拓者到如今的衣冠楚楚的教授议员高大上,私人枪支,不管作用是好是坏,已经成了美国人们生活中血肉相连不可分割的一部分。在现实的美国,禁枪除了喊几句口号,根本也没有办法实行,就算是最严厉的禁枪宣言,也不过是限枪,几乎是不疼不痒。原因很简单,美国的枪支多过了人口,可以想象禁枪会得罪多少人。想象把选票当成性命美国总统,无论是谁,都不敢轻易触碰。
在这次的悲剧中,枪击发生的小镇,距离美国于墨西哥边境的公路里程为58英里,在当前政府的宽松边境政策呼召下,美国今年三月份收容了21万非法移民(对不起,政治正确的说法应该是无证移民),想象一下没有被发现的会有多少,如果向这个小镇的居民发出倡议,要所有人上缴家里的枪支,我想最客气的反馈也将会被骂成神经病。
当然凡是皆有可能,最有力的例证就是希特勒在德国的禁枪。但设想在美国掌权的会是希特勒,还不如干脆说成塔利班。
真相之二,为什么政客要禁枪?
既然不可能,为什么禁枪浪潮还是风起云涌,答案其实很简单,禁枪就是运动,或者说是折腾!
在美国,包括总统在内的政客,都是明码标价的工作,可能申请面试的过程会非常复杂,但就是一份工作。好比一个房产经纪人,这些人绝对不会管应不应该,只是要撺掇你去买卖,他们的立场,完全取决你又没有房。简单来说,支持拥枪的政客,就像讨好他那些有资格买枪的选民;而反过来说,如果一个政客的选民大多都有案底的话,那他当然会不遗余力大义凛然地鼓吹禁枪。
简单一个分析就会知道,政客的目标其实不在于减少枪支暴力。傻瓜都知道,枪击绝对都发生在所谓的无枪区(Gun Free Zone),可以想象罪犯都是些什么样的人(或者是什么样的类人),好像这个无枪区就是个纵容甚至是鼓励。由此推论,只要取消这个引诱的招牌,其余什么都不用做,就会有效果。
另外一说,美国谋杀案世界排名第三,但如果排除禁枪最最严格的五大城市,芝加哥,底特律,华盛顿,圣路易斯和费城之后,排名会跌到189!可谁都知道,这几个城市可是绝对可靠的大票仓,绝对不能触碰,想要改变,简直是白日做梦。
所以再重复一次,禁枪就是个运动,或者称为折腾,除了为政客争取一些选票,为军火商增加利润之外,不会对枪击案件,产生任何哪怕是轻微的影响。
真相之三,我们该怎么办?
上面说过的非法移民,加上政府大爱泛滥下日渐增多的提前释放罪犯。如果你有一副亚裔的脸孔,又不能马上让别人确信你就是成龙或者李小龙,金玉良言,还是乖乖地带上一把枪。当然拥枪与否,绝对是个人自由,别人可以宣传呼吁,但是绝对不能强求。枪手这里出于私心,恳请各位不论处于什么原因,都不要义大义凛然地反对改善一点亚裔华人胆小懦弱的形象,于己于人,都是善莫大焉!
那这次的案子来说,罪犯虽然凶残,但心灵绝对的扭曲和卑鄙,就是疯狂,也是最懦弱的那种。但是如果事先知道小学里面的老师也可能有枪,那么改变犯罪目标,甚至打消企图,也不无可能。如果罪犯耳濡目染,渐渐知道不能轻易招惹华人,我们也在无形中,捍卫了自身的安全。
还有就是这次枪击案的细节正在不断地披露,不能不说其中警察的表现实在是令人齿冷。一大队警察,在校外听着枪声,等了一个多小时,最后都没敢动一动。而由此间接发出的信息就是,警察连小学都不管,更遑论你我草民的家庭。
还是那句话,我人当自强,少纷争,左手选票右手枪!
下面的视频可算是枪手的心声,也花了不少心血。视频被屏蔽了预览画面,可能是触动了优管的神经,不知道应该是骄傲还是惋惜。不过也好,没有广告也证明了枪手没有私心。
几分钟让你清醒,华人要不要拥枪
更多视频请见 流浪枪手视频目录 或 流浪枪手YouTube频道。
更多我的博客文章>>> 枪击惨剧背后的真象 经典武器的时髦里程 帅哥亮相,身形颀长的勃朗宁 买枪全过程,美国武器商店的风景 美国人的真实防卫理念
校园屠杀不一定要用枪, 也不是现在才有的事情。
美国历史上最大的校园屠杀案是1927年密西根 Bath School 案。 杀手用炸药杀害38名学生和6个成年人。 比用AR15残酷多去了。要不是杀手失误把自己提前炸死,他还有500磅的炸药计划炸死全校学生。
要知道, 美国那时候基本没有枪械管制,连发自动冲锋枪(如下图芝加哥打字机)都可以合法拥有甚至邮购,无需任何背景调查。
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/3501380-more-than-half-of-americans-want-stricter-gun-laws-poll/
More than half of Americans want stricter gun laws: poll BY MONIQUE BEALS - 05/25/22 2:31 PM ET SHARETWEETA poll conducted between the mass shootings that took place this month in Buffalo, N.Y., and Uvalde, Texas, found that over half of Americans supported making gun violence laws more strict.
Fifty-four percent of Americans surveyed in a CBS News-YouGov poll out Wednesday said they would like to see stricter laws regulating the sale of guns. Another 30 percent said they wanted gun laws to remain the same, and 16 percent said they wanted gun laws to be less strict.
The poll showed that beliefs regarding such laws differed across party affiliation, with 79 percent of Democrats surveyed favoring stricter gun sale laws, compared to 27 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of independents.
Meanwhile 9 percent of Democrats pooled, 24 percent of Republicans and 17 percent of independents said they wanted less strict gun sale laws.
The largest portion of Republicans polled, 49 percent, said they wanted gun sale laws to remain the same, along with 33 percent of independents and 12 percent of Democrats, according to the poll.
The survey was conducted between May 18 and May 20 and included a sample of 2,041 U.S. adults. It has a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.
The interviews with respondents occurred just days before Tuesday’s brutal shooting in Texas left 19 elementary school students and two teachers dead.
Since the attack, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has begun the process of getting two bills that would expand and strengthen background check requirements for gun sales on the Senate’s legislative calendar
Worries about coming ObamaCare premium spikes intensifySchool counselors say students socially, emotionally frozen amid pandemic: NYT surveyBoth bills passed the House last year. Gun control measures face an uphill battle in the evenly split Senate, however. Most legislation requires 60 votes in the upper chamber to overcome a filibuster, and Republicans have not shown support for implementing new limits on the sale or ownership of firearms.
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) has also said that one of the bills passed by the House, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021 or H.R. 8, is too far-reaching.
Manchin has instead pushed for a narrower plan that exempts transfers and sales between family and friends, a proposal he negotiated with input from the National Rifle Association (NRA) in 2013.
左派媒体的poll是用来影响民意, 而不是反映民意。
控枪是幌子。
还有波士顿马拉松爆炸案。禁枪没用跟禁炸药没用一个道理。
枪是百年前的低科技, 也是可以在车库里造的。
洗耳恭听
何来自卫? 当然要是有人说要用它推翻暴政,阻击非法移民, 那我就没法再说下去了。这种武器本来在布什前就是该禁的。
2)手枪都可以有,但加长弹夹不能随便买,幽灵枪也不可以。普通布枪和猎枪当然可以有。
3)要建立全国的数据库,严查背景, 有精神病记录或最近有症状的都不可以买,不能用什么理由为这些人开脱,听政府的, 不管你支持什么党的政府, 现在就听本届政府的调查记录为准。下次要是共和党上了台也一样。这是医学数据,不要跟政治扯在一起。
再说, 现在的情况枪支泛滥到如此地步, 枪支再不查控, 我们这些合法的拥枪者实际上是背了黑锅,名声扫地,“有枪的都不是好人”已经越来越被人认可。所以无条件地反对控枪, 最后是害了自己! 我相信许多拥枪的人最后会接受“合理控枪”这个观点。
不能随身带, 可以用来保家呀。 你怎么看待AR15八次自卫案例? 你显然信息来源只有CNN,没听说过很正常。
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/03/14/8-times-law-abiding-citizens-saved-lives-ar-15/
能没有个限制吗?
对枪法的其它方面没有什么改变, 这是人心所归。
你想说因为可以禁导弹就可以禁枪, 什么逻辑?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/open-carry-states?
是用短管猎枪或左轮, 而不是assult weapon.
左派的所谓禁assault weapon是个偷换概念,目的就是要禁所有枪, 因为所有自卫枪械都可以用来攻击。
https://www.chronline.com/stories/bill-would-ban-open-carry-weapons-at-peaceful-state-capitol-protests,259882
严格说来,限制拥枪肯定是与降低枪杀案有正相关的,当然也肯定有例外的情况,只是总体上会下降不少。因为这种长枪对自卫帮助不大但可以助长杀手的欲望和效果。虽然确实有非法枪支可以买,但大屠杀的杀手通常都是心理有问题的,与黑道上的人很不一样,如果不能合法轻易地买到枪的话,有些可能就放弃了,或转为其他的方式发泄。
变成禁所有的枪, 因为就算是民主党的很多议员也是爱枪的, 这样的法案肯定是通不过的。
么不想想哪个国家有18岁的孩子就想报复社会?
大量的枪从埃及这样的国家,以及腐败国家的军方流入黑枪贩子手里面,然后黑帮再从枪贩子那里拿枪。
老百姓只能在枪口下给黑帮交保护费。
黑帮有钱了买更多的枪。
这个人脑子瓦特了,却还假装正常人说话,哎。
认为人人都有枪就安全是错的。坏人比我们更敢开枪,精神病人未成年人不太明白开枪的后果。非法制造枪械 炸药,和轻易在市场上买到,是两个完全不同的概念,不要混淆,更不要有意混淆。
也可以按过去3年的交税记录设立购枪制度