The Association of German National Jews (German: Verband nationaldeutscher Juden) was a German Jewish organization during the Weimar Republic and the early years of Nazi Germany that eventually came out in support of Adolf Hitler.
...
In 1934 the Association made the following statement:[6]
We have always held the well-being of the German people and the fatherland, to which we feel inextricably linked, above our own well-being. Thus we greeted the results of January 1933, even though it has brought hardship for us personally.
The seemingly ironic fact that a Jewish association advocated loyalty to the Nazi programme gave rise to a contemporary joke about Naumann and his followers ending their meeting by giving the Nazi salute and shouting "Down With Us!".[7][8]
Since 2011, Chinese-owned companies have collectively announced $1.54 billion in capital investment and the creation of nearly 5,300 new jobs in South Carolina,
https://apnews.com/article/south-carolina-foreign-land-ownership-158e23561036f15505775f9a81251ae5?
大家都关注德州的法案，结果人家南卡州高票通过，连开餐馆的都不允许拥有餐馆本身。
During debate, Senate Minority Leader Brad Hutto asked if someone with a green card, for example, could open a restaurant.
Massey replied that such a person could do so but not own the building where it is housed. “Why is that?”
Hutto asked. “I thought the American Dream was kind of to own your own business?”
“Once they become a citizen, they could do that,” Massey said, adding: “They are still citizens of foreign adversaries.”
这类法案属于无事生非骗眼球，最后啥事也没有。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National_Jews
The Association of German National Jews (German: Verband nationaldeutscher Juden) was a German Jewish organization during the Weimar Republic and the early years of Nazi Germany that eventually came out in support of Adolf Hitler.
...
In 1934 the Association made the following statement:[6]
The seemingly ironic fact that a Jewish association advocated loyalty to the Nazi programme gave rise to a contemporary joke about Naumann and his followers ending their meeting by giving the Nazi salute and shouting "Down With Us!".[7][8]
Since 2011, Chinese-owned companies have collectively announced $1.54 billion in capital investment and the creation of nearly 5,300 new jobs in South Carolina,
https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/statehouse-bills-banning-chinese-companies-from-buying-sc-land-called-discriminatory/article_40aa9b54-bd19-11ed-8769-13ddf69bb60d.html
中国的问题，是赚了美国人的钱和工作。所以中国内部的问题都拿来说话，比如维吾尔人的劳改营，TikTok的中国股东。
我希望是不要把中美的贸易问题上升到你死我活的冷战。
只有左派法官才会以“宪法是活的”之类鬼话篡改法律
宪法是活的还是死的，都是为某个政治理念的辩护。
所以中国朋友遍天下不是吹的！
(D) The provisions of subsection (C) do not apply to a citizen of a foreign adversary who:
(1) also is a citizen of the United States; or
(2) resides in the United States, and
(a) has been granted lawful permanent resident status by the United States government, and
(b) acquires no more than five acres for residential use.
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess125_2023-2024/bills/576.htm?
你这句话恰好证实了左派无视宪法和法律尊严。 宪法保障持枪权利， 当然不能因为几个疯子就废除。
当然不能也不应该禁枪。 在所有允许教职员工隐蔽持枪的学校， 从来没有发生枪击案。左派知道吗？
左派只有感觉， 没有思考。 这就是个典型例子。
犹他州就允许老师持枪， 从来没有发生枪击案。 德州老师是否持枪由学区决定。 枪击案就恰恰发生在不允许的学区。
说你不可理喻你还不服气。 给你两个人， 一个是受过多年教育的老师， 一个是上不了大学的警察， 哪个持枪你更放心？呵呵， 我就知道你宁可警察持枪也不放心老师。
虽然你不可理喻， 还是跟你讲道理。 隐蔽持枪的意义就在于旁人不知道谁有枪。 允许老师隐蔽持枪是对杀手的威慑。 即使全校没一个老师持枪， 杀手也会三思而行，去找没枪的地方发疯。
很多学校就有公开持枪的警察跟孩子在一起， 你好像并不在意呀。就因为他穿了警服？左派真是不可思议。
你倒好，头疼医头脚疼医脚。杀手不去学校去商店，你就拍拍手说问题解决了？然后怎么样？全社会到处都是枪。
不知道是谁不可理喻。
所有禁枪都是禁良民的枪。 枪是百年前的低科技，属于车库里能造的东西。禁枪的结果恰恰是只有杀手才能拿到枪。
再次证明左派只有感觉， 没有思考。 你有什么良民能拿到枪又”不让杀手拿到枪“ 的高招？想想看？
馆藏精品_北京市公安局警察博物馆 (beijing.gov.cn)
学校杀手大多是心理有问题的年轻人。他们的精神疾病和拿到枪的容易程度是构成学校枪击案的必要条件。美国学校枪击案件很多，已经形成了一个精神疾病的传染（copycat）问题。
所谓“良民”和“罪犯”，都是在事后的20/20. 这些杀手没有犯罪记录，都是良民，都是因为容易拿到枪，才变成了杀手。有精神疾病有愤怒的人，没有犯罪历史，很容易拿到枪，很容易想到去攻击自己受过气的学校。
医学界研究过自杀案件的，发现自杀者往往只注重一种自杀办法，比如吸煤气，或者跳桥。把自杀方法防止了，自杀率会减少。这是解决问题的办法，而不是说反正自杀者想死你也没办法，罪犯想杀人你也没有办法。
就知道你没有绝招让良民能有枪又“不让杀手拿到枪”。 禁枪又违宪。 所以左派因为自己的政治立场不惜违宪。 这是这一串讨论的本来题目。 你的所以说辞无非是证明了这一点。 下次再跟你讲道理。
https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/tzlc/1696994.html
不给你们中国特务任何空子钻！
你的逻辑就是人人携枪，然后教堂里面，商店里面，学校里面乱枪回击。这不是我想生活的社会。我不是回避，我是说你的逻辑导致一个疯狂社会。
持枪者的思路就是，更多的枪，更多的枪。不允许更多的枪就是“回避”他的逻辑。
有何不可？中国人不是讲究，“亲兄弟明算账”么，总不能双重标准么。
何况今天，两国处于新冷战状态，处处对抗，互相下绊子找茬打架，土地购买上，互不相让，实属正常。
咋就我买你的地，你不能不卖，你买我的地，我不卖就合理合法呢？这不是强买强卖，是什么？
除非美国政府欠了中国政府的债，还不起，卖地还债，否则，就是中国钻美国的空子，投机渗透，包藏祸心么。
咋还有辣么多子孙后代要在这块土地上生存，却急吼吼要把这块土地卖给中国的傻瓜呢？
爱中国爱昏了头，连子孙后代都一块儿卖掉啦？
74 people have been killed or injured by guns at American schools this year
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/29/1166651590/nashville-school-shootings-gun-violence-children-cause-death-2023