American professor Emily Hammond, an expert in energy and environmental law with George Washington University, said: "The challenge with radionuclides (such as tritium) is that they present a question that science cannot fully answer; that is, at very low levels of exposure, what can be counted as 'safe'?
"One can have a lot of faith in the IAEA's work while still recognising that compliance with standards does not mean that there are 'zero' environmental or human consequences attributed to the decision."
The US National Association of Marine Laboratories released a statement in December 2022 saying it was not convinced by Japan's data.
And marine biologist Robert Richmond, from the University of Hawaii, told the BBC: "We've seen an inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment that makes us very concerned that Japan would not only be unable to detect what's getting into the water, sediment and organisms, but if it does, there is no recourse to remove it... there's no way to get the genie back in the bottle."
Environmental groups such as Greenpeace go further, referring to a paper published by scientists at the University of South Carolina in April 2023.
Shaun Burnie, a senior nuclear specialist with Greenpeace East Asia, says tritium can have "direct negative effects" on plants and animals if ingested, including "reduced fertility" and "damage to cell structures, including DNA".
绿色和平组织东亚区高级核专家肖恩·伯尼表示，摄入氚会对植物和动物产生“直接负面影响”，包括“降低生育能力”和“损害包括 DNA 在内的细胞结构”。
https://www.cnnp.com.cn/cnnp/resource/cms/article/1086607/1206028/QS-5EM-RCEM-22032101%20%E7%A7%A6%E5%B1%B1%E6%A0%B8%E7%94%B5%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%85%AC%E5%BC%80%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A%EF%BC%882021%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%89.pdf
秦山核电站放射排放报告（2021年）
从这个报告大家可以看出类似核电站正常运转对周围空气和海水的污染情况，包括各种元素的总量和散发到环境以后的辐射密度。注意这个废水里不仅有氚，还有其他放射物质包括铯。所以所谓的没有发生事故的电站的冷却水只有氚是不正确的。
注意看表2，表3，表5，表6。
这个排放是连续例行的，所以观测到的是包括这个设施开始运转以来很多年的积累的结果。
https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/zj/bgth/200910/W020080310476221095241.pdf
下一个文件是中国政府颁布的核电站排污标准，各个电站不同，污水排出时放射浓度从几百到几千BQ／升，与这次日本排放的浓度1000BQ／升是类似的。值得指出的是秦山电站的标准是3700BQ／升，大大高于福岛排放的浓度。
包括国际原子能机构之内，任何第三方检测机构都不被允许检测福岛核废水，所以你看不到除了东电之外的任何机构的检测报告，这是事实吧。
而且关于核废水处理和过滤使用的设备和原理图，东电也拒绝提供，这就是运动员和裁判员都是同一个人。
小日本弄虚作假的事情还少了吗，一旦被发现就鞠躬道歉，然后就没有然后了。
小日本坏得很，他的数据，我信他个鬼。
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/japans-radioactive-water-nuclear-watchdog-vows-independent-sampling-monitoring/2976245#:~:text=Amid%20criticism%20against%20Japan's%20releasing,will%20keep%20monitoring%20the%20situation.
American professor Emily Hammond, an expert in energy and environmental law with George Washington University, said: "The challenge with radionuclides (such as tritium) is that they present a question that science cannot fully answer; that is, at very low levels of exposure, what can be counted as 'safe'?
"One can have a lot of faith in the IAEA's work while still recognising that compliance with standards does not mean that there are 'zero' environmental or human consequences attributed to the decision."
乔治华盛顿大学能源和环境法专家、美国教授艾米丽·哈蒙德表示：“放射性核素（例如氚）面临的挑战是，它们提出了一个科学无法完全回答的问题；也就是说，在非常低的暴露水平下 ，什么才算“安全”？
“人们可以对原子能机构的工作充满信心，同时仍然认识到遵守标准并不意味着该决定对环境或人类造成‘零’后果。”
加的辐射过程中突变的。
The US National Association of Marine Laboratories released a statement in December 2022 saying it was not convinced by Japan's data.
And marine biologist Robert Richmond, from the University of Hawaii, told the BBC: "We've seen an inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment that makes us very concerned that Japan would not only be unable to detect what's getting into the water, sediment and organisms, but if it does, there is no recourse to remove it... there's no way to get the genie back in the bottle."
Environmental groups such as Greenpeace go further, referring to a paper published by scientists at the University of South Carolina in April 2023.
美国国家海洋实验室协会2022年12月发表声明称，日本的数据并不令其信服。
夏威夷大学的海洋生物学家罗伯特·里士满告诉英国广播公司：“我们看到放射学和生态影响评估不充分，这让我们非常担心日本不仅无法检测到水、沉积物中的物质， 生物体，但如果确实如此，就没有办法将其移除……没有办法让精灵回到瓶子里。”
绿色和平组织等环保组织更进一步，引用了南卡罗来纳大学科学家于 2023 年 4 月发表的一篇论文。
Shaun Burnie, a senior nuclear specialist with Greenpeace East Asia, says tritium can have "direct negative effects" on plants and animals if ingested, including "reduced fertility" and "damage to cell structures, including DNA".
绿色和平组织东亚区高级核专家肖恩·伯尼表示，摄入氚会对植物和动物产生“直接负面影响”，包括“降低生育能力”和“损害包括 DNA 在内的细胞结构”。
只是说数据由日本提供，倾倒是日本自己的事，无权干涉
国际原子能机构网上都有，还有完整的检测数据和报告，唉，上午贴过LINK被删。。
响。你的理由是宇宙射线要强得多，但是地面上要比坐飞机好多了。很多人是不大坐飞机的。
中国核电站的排放有还是没有检测报告，和小日本不允许其他检测机构检测核废水是两个独立事件，没有任何关联度。
不能说因为某只非洲长颈鹿踢伤了一个狮子，所以就放火烧了夏威夷的毛伊岛吧，独立事件之间不存在因果关系。
更何况谁都可以去中国核电站的排污口收集水样，谁想检测请自便。
有非常巨大的危险性，后面改进后的核电站安全系数在逐渐提高，但是老的技术有非常大的安全隐患。