I viewed several of his production a few years ago. He had no true insights. His "logic" was like holding a flashlight walking in dark, and could only lead to see from spot to spot. The reason behind this was that he had no genuine values 價值觀, hence had no true vision.
I also viewed his interview by 許知遠. He didn't seem dishonest, yet he did seem having himself misled by his own false intellectuality and the success in turning it into business of profits.
那个时候美国就要利用中国？证据？逻辑推理？
都是罗胖自己的逻辑。
在远东，英日是同盟，制衡俄国，美国同样和中国是同盟，制衡俄国，所以美中关系是比较好的。
事实也是，美利坚和大清无隔阂，甚至主动靠拢，庚子赔款就是一个例证，罗胖也提到中国第一个外交官说蒲安臣。就国家层面，美国没有必要针对中国做出排华法。
还是回到根本：即便美国利用中国( 美国哪个国家不利用呢），为什么独独排斥华人？你的答案？或者说，罗胖的分析哪条不对？
排华法案产生于1882年，骆家辉母亲来美什么时候？有了排华法案当然来不了了。
“不接受也赶不走”是说华人叶落归根，老了就回国（所以有不死的中国人），但新人还是前赴后继的来。
跟排华不排华没有必然关系。
美国还一边支持以色列一边给加沙救济，去掉一边不是更好吗？不。它两边都占。
跟中国有利用关系跟排华法案，为啥不能两边都占？
至于为啥只有排华，俺没有答案。
你的问题是罗胖知道，要反驳罗胖。
但罗胖说的，前后矛盾。根本知道他说的是啥，不值得反驳。
I viewed several of his production a few years ago. He had no true insights. His "logic" was like holding a flashlight walking in dark, and could only lead to see from spot to spot. The reason behind this was that he had no genuine values 價值觀, hence had no true vision.
I also viewed his interview by 許知遠. He didn't seem dishonest, yet he did seem having himself misled by his own false intellectuality and the success in turning it into business of profits.
另，那句原话是：华人是“我国既不能收留也不能赶走的一个种族”
least far better than blindfolded wandering in the dark. isn't it?
what is your logic view of the Chinese Exclusion Act？
it becomes complete darkness and the pit you fall in is everything you know.
I don't care about the exclusion act. It is a bad karma for those who made it, not me.
这就没有讨论的意义了。
所以：“美国跟中国关系好，所以不应该对华工不友好”根本就是一个想象的说法。
他说华工不参加罢工，对投票没有兴趣。事实是华工没有公民权，不能投票。