The Texas Franchise Law prohibits Tesla from selling its cars directly to consumers as it requires all auto dealers to sell their cars through franchise or third-party dealers. This means the dealership acts as a middleman between auto manufacturers and consumers. This law is in place to protect the current auto dealers and ensure they remain competitive in the market. Traditional auto dealerships have lobbied governments to create a favorable environment for them to operate. The law also prevents manufacturers like Tesla from undercutting prices, allowing dealerships to remain profitable. Tesla handles its pricing, and the law also prevents manufacturers like Tesla from offering any vehicle warranty or service plan unless the repairs and services are carried out at an independent garage. Tesla would have to partner with auto dealers to offer these services to comply with these laws. The company actively avoids doing this as adding dealerships to the process will either drive up prices or eat into their profits. Tesla’s Lawsuits and Legislative Challenges In response to the Franchised dealer Laws, Tesla filed a lawsuit against the Texas Motor Vehicle Board, claiming that such a law is unconstitutional. The issue wound up on the Supreme Court’s doorstep, but the decision favored the Texas Motor Vehicle Board. Both sides appealed the decision and eventually settled, with Tesla being allowed to operate showrooms and service centers across Texas but not sell vehicles directly. Apple Stores inspire the layout and design of these new establishments. Inside, employees will offer test drives but won’t be able to answer pricing questions or provide any other services one would expect from a conventional car lot. Tesla seems determined to sell vehicles directly in Texas. The business is appealing to a federal court to overturn the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles’ restriction on direct-to-consumer sales. These legal battles have b
1. 到底是什么变了?
2. 应该优先照顾谁的利益?
为啥?因为在他心里,踢掉O8的东西报O8一剑之仇才是最重要的. 然后动的是税法减税(富人当然减得多)。现在他是说让他再当一届他就会处理移民法?谁知道呢?我觉得俩党在这方面心里其实是一至的,嘴巴说而已。
左也是自打嘴巴。
多好的机会呀,总统,和俩院都是他。因为,其实他们根本不想真的解决这个移民问题,解决这个对他们没有什么实质性的好处,倒是竞选时就经常拿这个来吸引选票。
川普家族需要O8 care 吗,笑死人。
德州只是禁止直销,没有不许它卖
只是不许车厂直接卖给消费者。
所以特斯拉不能在德州卖车,但是其它电车厂可以通过经销商卖。
的根本所在,要通过国会立法,一但立法通过就好办了。俩党都不愿意真正的解决,不愿意改法。
30年前的克林顿没太大差别,可问题是16年他出来竞选,一开始就占据中间点,而民主党为了反川而反川。既然老川站了中间,他们往左挪,然后本身也被极左人士给绑架,脱不了身。然后老川就占据common sense和基本盘越来越多。老川是把民主党逼得无路可走了。以前的民主党一直是左派和liberal共存。
现在民主党把很多中间温和派人士给赶走,包括以前民主党偶像一般存在的肯尼迪家族。还有16年若是希拉里上台,美国也不至于这么左。
现在民主党被LGBTQ,黑人,穆斯林极左人士给绑架了.而老川也把民主党的核心价值观给cornered了。
其实Elon一直是liberal或是libertarian,可惜他们也受不了民主党极左的价值观,因为他还算个正常人,有正常人的思维.
没太大不同,尤其你看看克林顿时期的政策,真的跟老川的政策差不多(也是反对毒品,加强边境),价值观也差不多。但是人没变,时代在进化到今天群魔乱舞的众生相。
还有我觉得老川也变聪明了,不再推特上没事半夜三更发牢骚。给了主流媒体的活靶子来24/7攻击他。还是低调一点好。
修改法律,会是谁更对非移宽容的?现在德州边境拉铁丝网,媒体和总统都不高兴要拆的,这样怎么修改你想要的法律,哪个党会反对对非移严格的法律?而且已有的总统权力和法律下可以阻止非移入境的,少了以后进来放,进来等,庇护什么的麻烦。
合法,只要申请蔽护,反正通不通得过要一段时间审批,人可以在美国自由行动,明知自己通不过的就不用等答案啦,只接打工生活,过几年要么跟公民结婚要么等总统大色
民主党守什么法?
你是被教育洗脑错太多了
这个起码的知识应该懂得
穿奇装异服。
中下层的反抗,除了分而治之,最行之有效的策略之一就是人为制造极左势力让正常民众厌恶从而投入上层的“怀抱”。那些台面上的“极左”有时左的超出正常智力思考范畴,除了某些确实可能“天赋异禀”,很多都是被安排来做“极左”的。
没看到店里到处都是南美人了吗?