When you desire their validation, it's a burden you place on them and you look and sound passive.
Act like you have no needs and focus on what you can do to satisfy their needs by asking questions that showcase your strong suit, rather than passively waiting to be questioned.
They probably used their "behavior" questions as the first block for you to "clear".
No one likes to be disrespected. But your response is entirely under your control. How you respond is telling.
两个面试官，事先recuiter 也没告诉职称。开始告诉我他们是做技术的，两人会轮流提问，进行到一半有一个突然离开，我发现视频冻结了，然后变成一个人提问直到结束，没有任何解释。我感觉希望不大，全是behavior 问题，一点儿也没问技术上的东西，大家觉得这事正常吗？
When you desire their validation, it's a burden you place on them and you look and sound passive.
Act like you have no needs and focus on what you can do to satisfy their needs by asking questions that showcase your strong suit, rather than passively waiting to be questioned.
They probably used their "behavior" questions as the first block for you to "clear".
No one likes to be disrespected. But your response is entirely under your control. How you respond is telling.
往不好了说，一个职位，要面谈3-5人，否则打起官司来没法交差，所以其中2-4人是凑数的。
公司登出来的工作招聘，不一定是真有空缺，有许多其他的原因。比如为了给某人办身份，公司可能要针对这个位置登好几个月的招聘，而且有的时候工资开得还很高。这样公司的律师就可以到移民局去说这个人属于特殊人才，我们开出高价，连续登了3个月，面试了20个人就他一个合适，等等。移民局一般要求律师出具招聘广告证明，比如在哪几个网站登的招聘广告，工资多少，招聘广告登了多久，有多少人应聘，等等。但是公司内部的面试人一般都知道内幕，所以面试一般都是走过场，很明显你就是被骗去凑数的人。见多了，有些大牌公司都玩这种把戏。
我认识一个老印，她和她老公自己有LLC，为了给她朋友办身份，他们自演自导，自己登广告，自己面试，最后“百里挑一”把她朋友“聘用”了，她朋友每月交钱给他们，他们扣一点overhead，然后给朋友开工资，再把钱转回到朋友手里，搞了一年多办了绿卡。