Just look at the student teacher ratio. It has 20% weight in the overall ranking. Plus, for a uiniversity that has medical school, the faculty count is including all medical researchers. It is a garbage in garbage out. I looked at last year's ranking and saw the flaws in its ranking.
For example. Prinston has a student teacher ratio of 5:1, it assigns only 68.7 value. For UMich, it has student teacher ratio of 14:1, yet it assigns 90.2. For UColorado Denver, it has a S/T ratio of 17:1, yet it has 100 value. For UC berkeley, it has S/T ratio opf 19:1, it has a value of 23.3. For UCLA, its S/T ratio is 18:1, yet it has 42.5. It is allover the place.
If Princeton has 100 like all other top private schools, everything else remains the same, it will be ranked at 10, rather than 20. If UCB is assigned at a similar value like UCLA, UCB would be ranked at 22.
紫檀热门 滑铁卢大学,加拿大 第7
复旦居然比UCB还好.各位回国上大学吧.
中国大学神速进步?
有点不对劲。
我们这里的ABC进美国的好学校竞争不用这么激烈了。
本科的话,兼顾一下US News. HR眼里 QS 50 ~= Us News T30 ~= 985 schools
不要脸啊不要脸
数英国人不要脸
复旦发表的文章会比UCB还多?
3,似乎有国内上来的网军,不给它们看
数字游戏而已。
我同学的女儿打小就是玩计算机竞赛,我跟她力荐滑大她死活都看不上,因为QS排名太低。
Duke在主要全球大学排名榜历年基本在20-30位。
而不是来自第3和独立机构的排名. 事实,QS排名更有意义.
What measures quality of education? what measures a great university?
What really matters as far as an education is concerned, for personal growth and life fulfillment?
Number of papers? Student outcome? (How do you measure that?)
Dartmouth produces top graduates who are very successful in their chosen fields.
The average earnings of Dartmouth students are among the very top of any university students world wide.
D has contributed a lot to senators to this country.
I think that being subjective here is that US News constantly changes its standard to fit its designed model
9月13日,U.S.News正式发布了2022年最新的全美综合性大学排行榜。作为世界最权威的排名机构之一,U.S.News一年一度发布的榜单已然成为赴美学子选校的重要参考,那么相较于去年,今年的榜单都有什么变化呢?
排名方法
教育成果 40%(2020年占比为35%)
师资力量 20%(2020年排名占比为20%)
专家意见 20%(2020年排名占比为20%)
财政资源 10%(2020年排名占比为10%)
学生表现 7%(2020年排名占比为10%)
校友捐赠 3%(2020年排名占比为5%)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation
https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/Endowment
Just look at the student teacher ratio. It has 20% weight in the overall ranking. Plus, for a uiniversity that has medical school, the faculty count is including all medical researchers. It is a garbage in garbage out. I looked at last year's ranking and saw the flaws in its ranking.
For example. Prinston has a student teacher ratio of 5:1, it assigns only 68.7 value. For UMich, it has student teacher ratio of 14:1, yet it assigns 90.2. For UColorado Denver, it has a S/T ratio of 17:1, yet it has 100 value. For UC berkeley, it has S/T ratio opf 19:1, it has a value of 23.3. For UCLA, its S/T ratio is 18:1, yet it has 42.5. It is allover the place.
If Princeton has 100 like all other top private schools, everything else remains the same, it will be ranked at 10, rather than 20. If UCB is assigned at a similar value like UCLA, UCB would be ranked at 22.
Just dont trust these ranks, too subjective.