Acitve liberal judges have used these injunctions to virtually blocked all president Trumps policies, to put this into perspective, There are a totol of 94 federal judicial districts, 5 of these ederal districts held 35 out of 40 of these nation wide injunctions.
CNN 的说法：
The high court’s embrace of Trump’s legal positions contrasts with a general resistance of lower court judges who in the early months of Trump’s second presidency have blocked dozens of his executive orders. Some judges have also commented about his larger quest for power.
今天高院判决地区联邦法官无权发布全国范围对总统命令的阻止令。 先看看川普的总检察长Pam Bondi 怎么说的，再看看CNN 怎么说的。
PAM BONDI:
Acitve liberal judges have used these injunctions to virtually blocked all president Trumps policies, to put this into perspective, There are a totol of 94 federal judicial districts, 5 of these ederal districts held 35 out of 40 of these nation wide injunctions.
CNN 的说法：
The high court’s embrace of Trump’s legal positions contrasts with a general resistance of lower court judges who in the early months of Trump’s second presidency have blocked dozens of his executive orders. Some judges have also commented about his larger quest for power.
看官评论： CNN 说地区法官总体上持反对川普立场（general resistance of lower court judges）， 可是CNN 论据是 过去几个月很多川普的行政令被地方法官否决。 可是事实是川普的很多行政令被极少数的地方法官发的全国禁令而暂停。 这极少数左派法官否决大部分总统行政令不正是滥用权力的证据吗，咋能说明地区法官总体上反对川普立场呢，极少数为啥能代表大多数成为‘总体上’ ？ CNN 的春秋笔法，和厚颜无耻真是得了共匪真传，不服不行。