Forster and colleagues found that the closest type of COVID-19 to the one discovered in bats – type ‘A’, the “original human virus genome” – was present in Wuhan, but surprisingly was not the city’s predominant virus type.
Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia.
Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers.
。。。
Variant ‘A’, most closely related to the virus found in both bats and pangolins, is described as 'the root of the outbreak' by researchers. Type ‘B’ is derived from ‘A’, separated by two mutations, then ‘C’ is in turn a “daughter” of ‘B’.B
Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia
https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/military/1646510.html
https://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2020/04/15/9363859.html
https://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2020/04/15/9363859.html
现在看上面的网友说那是误解了作者的原意， 那也有可能的， 就是A， B， C都是源于武汉的， 变异了。
中国又回到改革开放前多数人都相信中国的”社会主义就是好，就是好“的时期了。一个国家到了指鹿为马，以假做真的时候，就离危机不远了。
问题上搅混水，势必让世界人民愤怒。
前者是斗争，人之间，国之间的斗争。目标是甩锅，不愿承担责任。
后者是合作，合作起来和病毒做斗争，是大家愿意分担责任。
每个旁观者可以检测下自己内心意愿。
9
Forster and colleagues found that the closest type of COVID-19 to the one discovered in bats – type ‘A’, the “original human virus genome” – was present in Wuhan, but surprisingly was not the city’s predominant virus type.
Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia.
Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of COVID-19 outside East Asia, say researchers.
。。。
Variant ‘A’, most closely related to the virus found in both bats and pangolins, is described as 'the root of the outbreak' by researchers. Type ‘B’ is derived from ‘A’, separated by two mutations, then ‘C’ is in turn a “daughter” of ‘B’.B
说到车祸，我以前看到一个新闻报道，两量车在高速上蹭到，两家人就把车停下，为谁的责任发生争执。结果又被其他车撞。两家共4人死亡。
如果没有安全问题，可以愿意追责就按程序去追责。当然也不是必然追到责。很多人都遇到过，被撞了车，对方逃逸的事。追不到责有怎么了。
另外我也朋友，车被别人撞了，算了就放过人家了，她说她这么做也因为有人这么对待过她。
事事无绝对，看当事人的选择。你就去选择你觉得对的好了，不用向他人证明你是对的。
就像我前面的例子中，下车吵架的一定认为自己的选择是对的。那就承担后果吧。
我发现你不能直面问题，老是转移话题。不多说了，你要确信你自己对的，就去照着镜子对自己说好了。
Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia
至少要懂得互相尊重吧？
再说了。我从来没认为病毒是其他地方的。以前这里讨论过。我说了当然是武汉。因为爆发的时间顺序。
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117
昨天也没有在家贴发过任何贴， 前天我转过自己写的介绍卫报否定病毒起源于实验室报道的贴。 我转自己的贴还有你批准? 老实说， 我常去家坛的也常在那发贴， 和那里好多ID都很谈得来， 那里Rude的人比较少。 半年前， 丁班还问过我是否愿意做他们的版主。 当然我拒绝了。 因为我觉得自己不能胜任.
没有美国病例大爆发以后的样本。
不是have visited. 说明这些美国人是一直住在武汉而感染上的，不是疫情前后正巧去了武汉感染上的。他们一直住在武汉，他们身上的病毒不是从美国或别的地方带去的。他们虽身为美国人，但疫情期间是wuhan residents。
其实只是在西海岸。文章说，包括在这个研究的all 病毒株是到3/4。这时纽约可能只发现几例。东岸的cases应是从意大利和欧洲来的C型。
The Gardian 是个很有信誉的老牌英国大报， 以公正独立著称。对于我帖子里说Fox 是唯一报道病毒出自武汉lab的媒体的误差， 我已在家坛和该帖子下面更正了。 除了Fox之外， Washington Post 和CNN也有报道