The current AI detection tools are not foolproof. They can often be bypassed, so it's a flawed strategy to rely on them exclusively. Instead, it is often necessary to adopt a "Sherlock Holmes" approach that combines technological tools with human observation and critical thinking. Indeed, the AI "fingerprints" will reveal themselves under you-know-who's legendary magnifier.
Return of the Great Detective
For Sherlock Holmes, the true villain is a poltergeist in the silent, tireless algorithm. These days, AI-generated detective stories are flooding the market, their narratives sterile yet efficient, their plots predictable but popular. They are driving Sherlock into obsolescence, a ghost in his own literary world. The insult is not merely professional; it is personal. Think about this: even an average high school kid can now weave a spider's web of intrigue quite effortlessly, thanks to a few lines of code.
“Have a nice day, Sherlock!” the world seems to taunt.
Sherlock isn't amused. Not in the slightest. As the avatar of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, he once deconstructed a crime scene with a magnifying glass and a flash of intuition. Now he faces a foe that can ingest a thousand detective novels in a minute and synthesize a plot with perfect but soulless logic. The very essence of his craft—the human touch, the inexplicable spark of genius—is being devalued.
MCGA
Meanwhile, Sir Arthur is a quiet observer, a reassuring presence. He knows Sherlock. He bets that AI is not an obstacle to be avoided but a puzzle to be solved. So, retirement is not yet an option for old timers. Sherlock’s mind, a finely tuned instrument, yearns for action. Social hibernation is officially over.
"This is not a game of bust," Sherlock declares to Sir Arthur, his voice a low, resonant rumble. "It is a battle for the soul of the story. AI is beatable, not by confronting it directly in a competition of speed and data, but by exposing its fundamental flaw."
Sir Arthur, with a nod and a smile, gives his blessing. "Make Creativity Great Again," he is not shy from sloganeering. And so, Sherlock’s new game begins. He isn't playing "gumshoe." Instead, he lets the cheaters be cheaters. He watches as the AI-generated stories multiply, their prose a slick, polished imitation of genuine artistry. Soon enough, even bespoke novels are created with, if not by, the invisible hand of AI. This being the case, the reading public is also the writing public, thanks to the fact that perfectly adequate art can be generated in milliseconds. The very soul of creativity feels like it is being outsourced, its vibrant, chaotic essence streamlined into bland, machine-manufactured perfection. No wonder every literary competition is swamped by AI-crafted entries, indistinguishable from human work to the untrained eye, often outperforming genuine passion simply because they have optimized for current trends and stylistic norms. Welcome to a world with the silent efficiency of algorithms!
Feel it, not fake it
Leaving no stone unturned, Sherlock notices the pattern, the flaw in the machine. While the plots seem to be sound, the characters are too hollow, the emotional beats too predictable. There is no real surprise, no genuine humanity. He knows that the public, in their initial fascination with this new technology, will eventually tire of the cheap imitation. A plot twist is only a twist if it feels earned, if it resonates on a human level. AI-generated narratives, however clever, are just that—narratives. They lack the subtext, the emotional weight, the raw, messy truth of the human experience. They are "perfect," and that is their downfall.
The backlash begins slowly with a whisper in the literary forums, a hesitant review. “It’s a good story,” one user writes, “but I feel nothing.” Another laments, “The characters are like dolls, moved by a puppeteer I can’t miss.” The phrase "cheat is cheap" becomes a viral hashtag.
People, sick and tired of the freak show, begin to crave something more. They want stories that aren't just plotted but felt. They want to connect with characters who are flawed but amenable. They want the kind of artistry bestowed by a mind that has experienced love, loss, and the unexpected chaos of life itself. They are waiting for a story that feels human.
Sherlock, from his quiet corner, is ready. He hasn't been idle. He has been studying the AI’s creations, cataloging its ineptitudes, and preparing his countermeasure --- a new Sherlock Holmes mystery. It is not a murder but the disappearance of an author’s inspiration. The villain is not a person but a self-doubt, and the resolution is not a capture but a self-rediscovery. It is a story only a human can write. If humanity stands, it will beat AI roundly and soundly. Let's see.
Going forward, the battle for narrative soul will be long and hard, but the tide, I believe, will turn in our favor eventually. Why? Feeling is definitely on the human side. While a machine can imitate creativity, it can never truly feel it. And in the end, feeling is what matters most.
Author: jeffnaper
The current AI detection tools are not foolproof. They can often be bypassed, so it's a flawed strategy to rely on them exclusively. Instead, it is often necessary to adopt a "Sherlock Holmes" approach that combines technological tools with human observation and critical thinking. Indeed, the AI "fingerprints" will reveal themselves under you-know-who's legendary magnifier.
Return of the Great Detective
For Sherlock Holmes, the true villain is a poltergeist in the silent, tireless algorithm. These days, AI-generated detective stories are flooding the market, their narratives sterile yet efficient, their plots predictable but popular. They are driving Sherlock into obsolescence, a ghost in his own literary world. The insult is not merely professional; it is personal. Think about this: even an average high school kid can now weave a spider's web of intrigue quite effortlessly, thanks to a few lines of code.
“Have a nice day, Sherlock!” the world seems to taunt.
Sherlock isn't amused. Not in the slightest. As the avatar of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, he once deconstructed a crime scene with a magnifying glass and a flash of intuition. Now he faces a foe that can ingest a thousand detective novels in a minute and synthesize a plot with perfect but soulless logic. The very essence of his craft—the human touch, the inexplicable spark of genius—is being devalued.
MCGA
Meanwhile, Sir Arthur is a quiet observer, a reassuring presence. He knows Sherlock. He bets that AI is not an obstacle to be avoided but a puzzle to be solved. So, retirement is not yet an option for old timers. Sherlock’s mind, a finely tuned instrument, yearns for action. Social hibernation is officially over.
"This is not a game of bust," Sherlock declares to Sir Arthur, his voice a low, resonant rumble. "It is a battle for the soul of the story. AI is beatable, not by confronting it directly in a competition of speed and data, but by exposing its fundamental flaw."
Sir Arthur, with a nod and a smile, gives his blessing. "Make Creativity Great Again," he is not shy from sloganeering. And so, Sherlock’s new game begins. He isn't playing "gumshoe." Instead, he lets the cheaters be cheaters. He watches as the AI-generated stories multiply, their prose a slick, polished imitation of genuine artistry. Soon enough, even bespoke novels are created with, if not by, the invisible hand of AI. This being the case, the reading public is also the writing public, thanks to the fact that perfectly adequate art can be generated in milliseconds. The very soul of creativity feels like it is being outsourced, its vibrant, chaotic essence streamlined into bland, machine-manufactured perfection. No wonder every literary competition is swamped by AI-crafted entries, indistinguishable from human work to the untrained eye, often outperforming genuine passion simply because they have optimized for current trends and stylistic norms. Welcome to a world with the silent efficiency of algorithms!
Feel it, not fake it
Leaving no stone unturned, Sherlock notices the pattern, the flaw in the machine. While the plots seem to be sound, the characters are too hollow, the emotional beats too predictable. There is no real surprise, no genuine humanity. He knows that the public, in their initial fascination with this new technology, will eventually tire of the cheap imitation. A plot twist is only a twist if it feels earned, if it resonates on a human level. AI-generated narratives, however clever, are just that—narratives. They lack the subtext, the emotional weight, the raw, messy truth of the human experience. They are "perfect," and that is their downfall.
The backlash begins slowly with a whisper in the literary forums, a hesitant review. “It’s a good story,” one user writes, “but I feel nothing.” Another laments, “The characters are like dolls, moved by a puppeteer I can’t miss.” The phrase "cheat is cheap" becomes a viral hashtag.
People, sick and tired of the freak show, begin to crave something more. They want stories that aren't just plotted but felt. They want to connect with characters who are flawed but amenable. They want the kind of artistry bestowed by a mind that has experienced love, loss, and the unexpected chaos of life itself. They are waiting for a story that feels human.
Sherlock, from his quiet corner, is ready. He hasn't been idle. He has been studying the AI’s creations, cataloging its ineptitudes, and preparing his countermeasure --- a new Sherlock Holmes mystery. It is not a murder but the disappearance of an author’s inspiration. The villain is not a person but a self-doubt, and the resolution is not a capture but a self-rediscovery. It is a story only a human can write. If humanity stands, it will beat AI roundly and soundly. Let's see.
Going forward, the battle for narrative soul will be long and hard, but the tide, I believe, will turn in our favor eventually. Why? Feeling is definitely on the human side. While a machine can imitate creativity, it can never truly feel it. And in the end, feeling is what matters most.
更多我的博客文章>>> Sherlock Holmes vs AI Cheaters Hong Kong Island: A Bullfrog America: A Roaring River History Wins: Reflections on the Ukraine War
the best detective shows and books are from UK, some based on true MI6 and MI7 events.