INS 在blockIV 就被取消了，concern .... from long distance
The previous Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile, retired over a decade earlier, was equipped with inertial guidance and the seeker of the Harpoon missile and there was concern with its ability to clearly discriminate between targets from a long distance, since at the time Navy sensors did not have as much range as the missile itself, which would be more reliable with the new seeker's passive detection and millimeter-wave active radar homing.[29][30] Raytheon estimates adding the new seeker would cost $250,000 per missile.[31] Other upgrades include a sea-skimming flight path.[32][33] The first Block IV TLAMs modified with a maritime attack capability will enter service in 2021.[34]
美国在出兵保护台湾的安全的立场上从来就是前后一致的。但是中国的立场却变来变去。上世纪70年代，台湾出于自保，秘密发展核武器，美国从中作梗，策反了台湾的首席科学家。为了换取台湾放弃其核计划美国承诺对台湾的安全负责到底。里根当政时，曾经专门派他的国家安全顾问苏尔茨到中国去说明，中美关系所有的一切都是基于中国对和平解决台湾问题的承诺，如果中国违反这个承诺，中美关系将不再存在. 苏尔茨在他的外交备忘录里有记载。在任中国驻美大使时，杨洁篪在美国的一次60分钟节目的采访中清楚的暗示了这件事，记得很清楚，杨说“United States has interest in west Pacific, we (Chinese government) understand it".
1. 潜艇从千里之外发射反舰导弹阻止共军渡海。
2. B21隐身轰炸机阻止共军渡海。
3. 从菲律宾和冲绳的基地以机动的陆基反舰导弹阻止共军渡海。
说起来都很简单。两个核武国家冲突的结果能控制住吗？
几波轰炸完，快艇都能冲过去，
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)
The previous Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile, retired over a decade earlier, was equipped with inertial guidance and the seeker of the Harpoon missile and there was concern with its ability to clearly discriminate between targets from a long distance, since at the time Navy sensors did not have as much range as the missile itself, which would be more reliable with the new seeker's passive detection and millimeter-wave active radar homing.[29][30] Raytheon estimates adding the new seeker would cost $250,000 per missile.[31] Other upgrades include a sea-skimming flight path.[32][33] The first Block IV TLAMs modified with a maritime attack capability will enter service in 2021.[34]
https://www.technologyreview.com/2011/03/20/88785/how-cruise-missiles-would-beat-gps-jammers-in-libya/
这也算新闻? you*tube上去搜 Biden Says U.S. Forces Would Defend Taiwan If China Invaded。在不同的场合，拜登说过几遍了。
美国在出兵保护台湾的安全的立场上从来就是前后一致的。但是中国的立场却变来变去。上世纪70年代，台湾出于自保，秘密发展核武器，美国从中作梗，策反了台湾的首席科学家。为了换取台湾放弃其核计划美国承诺对台湾的安全负责到底。里根当政时，曾经专门派他的国家安全顾问苏尔茨到中国去说明，中美关系所有的一切都是基于中国对和平解决台湾问题的承诺，如果中国违反这个承诺，中美关系将不再存在. 苏尔茨在他的外交备忘录里有记载。在任中国驻美大使时，杨洁篪在美国的一次60分钟节目的采访中清楚的暗示了这件事，记得很清楚，杨说“United States has interest in west Pacific, we (Chinese government) understand it".