Music for the native Americans. 加拿大乱坟岗埋葬的成百上千的儿童尸骨,终于开始唤醒加拿大人的良知

枫林晓
楼主 (文学峸)

Indigenous children set to receive billions after judge rejects Trudeau challenges

First Nations children entitled to government compensation Canada ‘wilfully and recklessly’ discriminated against them  

 

 

Trudeau in Ottawa on Tuesday. The tribunal ruled the federal government was required to pay compensation worth C$40,000 to each child removed from his or her home. Photograph: Blair Gable/Reuters

 

 

 

Rights and freedom is supported by About this content Leyland Cecco in Toronto Wed 29 Sep 2021 22.08 BST

 

         

 

A federal court in Canada has paved they way for billions in compensation to First Nations children who suffered discrimination in the welfare system, after a judge dismissed a pair of legal challenges by the government.

Two years ago, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the federal government had “wilfully and recklessly” discriminated against Indigenous children living on reserves by failing to properly fund child and family services.

 

  Trudeau appeal could block billions in compensation to Indigenous children Read more

The tribunal ruled the federal government was required to pay compensation worth C$40,000 to each child removed from his or her home – the maximum allowable under the country’s human rights act.

But instead of paying out the compensation, the prime minister Justin Trudeau said his government would appeal the ruling to “make sure we’re getting compensation right”.

On Wednesday, however, a federal judge wrote that the tribunal’s compensation ruling was not unreasonable.

“No one can seriously doubt that First Nations people are among the most disadvantaged and marginalized members of Canadian society,” justice Paul Favel wrote in his decision. “The tribunal was aware of this and reasonably attempted to remedy the discrimination while being attentive to the very different positions of the parties.”

The court also weighed in on a separate battle over “Jordan’s principle”, which states First Nations children shouldn’t be deprived of care while governments fight over responsibility of cost. The principle was named after Jordan River Anderson, a five-year-old child who died of a medical condition while governments fought over who should pay for his care.

Favel concluded that in both cases, the government failed to establish that either of the tribunal’s decisions were unreasonable.

The battle for compensation dates back 14 years, when Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations argued that by underfunding child welfare on reserve, Ottawa’s actions amounted to racial discrimination.

Indigenous leaders have long criticized prime minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to fight both of these rulings. Critics have said the refusal to provide compensation to children is not in line with a government committed to reconciliation.

In June, New Democratic party leader Jagmeet Singh brought forward a motion asking the federal government to abandon its legal challenges. The motion passed unanimously in the House of Commons.

In September’s election debate, Singh again attacked Trudeau for his government’s refusal to compensate children.

“You can’t take a knee one day if you’re going to take Indigenous kids to court the next. That’s not leadership,” he said – a reference to Trudeau kneeling during an anti-racism protest last year.

Wednesday’s landmark ruling was celebrated by Indigenous leaders – and by lawmakers who have long called for the government to compensate the affected children.

“Today was an absolute victory for First Nation children. For six years Justin Trudeau spent millions fighting the rights of Indigenous children and trying to overturn a ruling that found his government guilty of ‘wilful and reckless’ discrimination against vulnerable Indigenous kids. The court has thrown his case out,” lawmaker Charlie Angus of the NDP said in a statement.

The First Nations Caring Society called the decision a “huge win” for Indigenous children and families.

“Today’s decision acknowledges the personal harm caused by Canada’s discrimination and affirms that First Nations deserve justice,” tweeted the Assembly of First Nations. “We hope that Canadians stand with us in recognizing that #EveryChildMatters.”

 

 

 

枫林晓
写过一个音乐集。

 

 


 

 

 

枫林晓
first nation, indigenous, indian, algonquinian, native 土著美洲人很多名字

那些名字是歧视性的,那些是最近出来的,那些是特定区域的,那些是土著美洲人自己认可的?。。。

 

陶陶三
枫兄很有人文情怀。
移花接木
这些都不带歧视性, indian是个错误, 应该是源自哥伦布, 他到了美洲后以为自己到了东方印度, 把北美土著人叫印度人
移花接木
我原以为爱斯基摩是带歧视性,但我看了很多视频, 他们说英语自称Eskimo,亚洲人长相,这也不算歧视了
移花接木
勇于自省本身就是人性在闪光, 疫情期间土豆的表现以及对加拿大道德观念坚持赢得不少人心, 所以他迫不及待地提前搞选举
枫林晓
年轻时,情情爱爱唧唧我我,能够让我感动写歌,现在,说实在的,老了,有孩子,社会不公,狭隘和邪恶,最能唤起我的愤青情怀。
枫林晓
希望native也能自强。否则,将来还是继续悲惨。
移花接木
安大略北边的原住民区,有很多志愿者帮着建房屋,每年都得重新建,因为冬天他们把木头拆下来生火了,生活习俗啊
b
beautifulwind
谢谢枫林!非常有社会责任感:)等有时间会仔细读,我现在上班期间几乎没有自由支配时间了:)
b
beautifulwind
如果你愿意,可以把音乐辑放进主帖:)
枫林晓
哈哈, 这也是没办法. :)
枫林晓
忙你的, 我就是来问问土著各种英文名字的区别和界限. 看看大家有没有说法.
陶陶三
还是看原住民自己接受什么,现在一般用indigenous people~~~。过去送的名字,一般都有贬义,现在送的一些又有拍马屁

之嫌。

indigenous people适中。就是本土原住民的意思。

b
beautifulwind
恭喜枫林。首页进来,谢谢网管,Music for the native Americans 推荐成功
枫林晓
我一直也是怕用错名字,讨人嫌。
枫林晓
谢谢版主网管推贴。也许能有更多人看到,参与这个讨论!
A
AP33912
这音乐反复锤打地上,好像在说这地下埋着小人。对加白人印象大降。