SPMO分析,Pros and Cons

l
lionhill
楼主 (文学峸)

SPMO ETF: A Closer Look at Performance and Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has been a standout performer in the first half of the year, tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index with a focus on around 100 high-momentum stocks from the S&P 500. Let's delve into the analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, along with a snapshot of its top 10 holdings based on the most recent data available.

**Pros of SPMO:**
1. **Impressive Historical Performance:** Since its inception in 2015, SPMO has delivered remarkable total returns of 338.1%, surpassing the broader S&P 500's performance of 231.2%. In 2024 alone, it boasted a return of 45.81%, compared to the S&P 500's 25.02%, making it an attractive option for growth-oriented investors.
2. **Momentum Strategy:** Capitalizing on high-momentum stocks, SPMO leverages persistent price trends, particularly beneficial during bullish market phases, especially in sectors like technology and financials.
3. **Cost-Effective:** With a modest expense ratio of 0.13%, SPMO stands out as a cost-efficient choice among its peers, appealing to investors interested in momentum strategies.
4. **Optimized Rebalancing:** SPMO undergoes semi-annual rebalancing in March and September, ensuring alignment with strong-performing stocks while shedding underperformers, thus enhancing potential returns.
5. **Strong Ratings:** Garnering a 5-star Morningstar rating for both 3- and 5-year periods, SPMO demonstrates robust risk-adjusted returns.

Cons of SPMO
1.  High Concentration Risk: The top 10 holdings account for nearly 60% of the portfolio, with significant weight in mega-cap stocks like NVIDIA (13.17%). This concentration increases vulnerability to corrections in a few key stocks.
2.  Higher Volatility: Momentum strategies are inherently volatile, as stocks with strong price trends can experience sharp corrections, especially during market downturns. SPMO’s max drawdown was -30.95% in a down year, only slightly better than broader market ETFs like VOO (-33.99%).
3.  Tax Inefficiency: Frequent rebalancing leads to higher turnover, potentially resulting in more taxable capital gains distributions compared to broader market ETFs like SPY, which has lower turnover. Holding SPMO in a tax-advantaged account like an IRA is recommended.
4.  Sector Bias: SPMO has heavy exposure to technology (e.g., NVIDIA, Amazon) and financials (23.15% vs. SPY’s 13.65%), which can underperform if these sectors face headwinds.
5.  Lower Dividend Yield: SPMO’s dividend yield is 0.46%, significantly lower than SPY’s 1.17%, making it less appealing for income-focused investors.
Top 10 Holdings as of April 2025

NVIDIA Corp 10.24% 

META Meta Platforms Inc 8.94% 

AMZN Amazon.com Inc. 8.36% 

AVGO Broadcom Inc 5.80% 

JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.16% 

TSLA Tesla Inc 4.59% 

WMT Walmart Inc 4.45% 

NFLX Netflix Inc 3.77% 

PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc 2.83% 

COST Costco Wholesale Corp 2.59%

名校FAN
觉得不错,可以避免买个股啦
6
6degrees
比TQQQ好吗?
l
lionhill
难说,但更能catch momentum stock
A
Artspace87
嗯,IRA里换这个不错,SPMO Top10最近应该是调仓位了,加了NFLX和COST,没有MSFT和AAPL

B
BBL123
听说盘子不大,如果有重仓风险会大吧??
Z
Zaplet
那我们照葫芦画瓢,就买这十只股票,跟着半年调一次仓会如何?
l
lionhill
谢谢我update了
l
lionhill
为什么要浪费这个时间买ETF就好
6
6degrees
不知道如何量化比较,所以上述问题问的有点唐突。
l
lionhill
TQQQ不能长持危险大得多刚才以为你说QQQ
越王剑
当然可以

自己麻烦点,但是省去了费用

6
6degrees
TQQQ损耗很大,是个问题。
l
lionhill
不觉得
6
6degrees
SPMO有没有三倍?
*
*江南雨*
学习了,赞!
m
marilyn
Tax free account 还可以,otherwise, not worth the time.
l
lionhill
没有
Z
Zaplet
都有道理。我现在在退休帐号学习建仓个股,想找个偷懒的策略,但又要beat 大盘!