All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities. The fact sheets include these state-specific laws.
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
https://www.c-span.org/video/?443300-1/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-discusses-law-tufts
https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/our-press-releases/fact-sheets-on-unlawful-militias-for-all-50-states-now-available-from-georgetown-laws-institute-for-constitutional-advocacy-and-protection/#:~:text=All%2050%20states%20prohibit%20private,include%20these%20state%2Dspecific%20laws.
All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities. The fact sheets include these state-specific laws.
“纪律良好的民兵队伍，对于一个自由国家的安全实属必要；人民持有和携带武器的权利，不得予以侵犯”
识字吗？哪里说只能是民兵组织才能拥枪？说民兵组织对国家有必要而已。 所以“人民持有和携带武器的权利，不得予以侵犯”
禁止的是engaging in activities reserved for the state militia。也就是说， 在正常年景不能自行执法。
英文的原话是：
‘A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.’
到了你的中文那里第3个逗号就变成了符号，把一个意思变成了两个意思！（别告诉我英语里没有分号）
“纪律良好的民兵队伍，对于一个自由国家的安全实属必要；人民持有和携带武器的权利，不得予以侵犯”
在中国，篡改宪法可是重罪
我是网上copy-paste来的， 道理是一回事。
但是这条宪法当时制定的历史条件和现在有很大的不同，现在社会的法制文明程度要高了不知多少倍，但美国到现在还可以合法买攻击性步枪， 我常在想， 这个可以买， 那么重机枪呢， 坦克大炮呢， 你能说哪一样第二修正案说了不许买吗？ 应该承认城市居民对武器是有个封顶限度的，我们这里来谈这个问题的人， 心里都是喜欢枪的， 但你喜欢不等于一个国家可以合法地一直有下去。
Scalia 所属的法律学派强调忠实于宪法的字面意义。Bryere代表左派主张宪法与时俱进。 因此Scalia的解释是宪法的原意。 Bryere是企图用他的主张修改宪法。
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
Scalia 所属的法律学派强调忠实于宪法的字面意义。Bryere代表左派主张宪法与时俱进。 因此Scalia的解释是宪法的原意。 Bryere是企图用他的主张修改宪法。
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
按定义， 攻击步枪是连发自动枪。 目前良民能买到的都是半自动， 不是军事意义上的攻击步枪。
左派故意混淆是非， 把民用半自动步枪当攻击步枪来禁。 当然要拒绝。
"But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty"
there is no first.
(发自我的文学城离线浏览器)
哈哈， 终于露馅了。 知道观点违法宪法就想自行修改？
左派和右派都认为宪法应该与时俱进。 但根本区别就是， 右派觉得宪法需要与时俱进就按程序修宪， 左派知道修宪无门就企图无视程序偷梁换柱。
Scalia是Texturist, 只认法律的字面意义。他的名言就是宪法是死的。 是怎么样就怎么样。 Bryere是左派， 左派从来自以为是以为比立国先贤更高明可以随意歪曲宪法。
法官无权对宪法与时俱进。只能按字面解释， 这就是Scalia的做法。