Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
人们是这样评价《资治通鉴》的意大利姐妹篇The Prince的：a teacher of evil, evil reco
Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
人们是这样评价《资治通鉴》的意大利姐妹篇The Prince的：a teacher of evil, evil reco
Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
我在这儿结识了一位老先生，成了忘年交。有一次和老先生聊天儿，说起读书，我说现在工作太忙，没有时间读书。将来退休了，闲下来以后要静下心来好好读几年书。老先生问我打算读什么书？我说我想读《资治通鉴》。老先生连连摆手说，不要犊《资治通鉴》，不要犊《资治通鉴》，因为一部《资治通鉴》，讲的就是如何颠覆别人，还有就是如何防止别人颠覆。老先生还说，毛主席这人本来不错，挺好的，就是读《资治通鉴》读坏了。
听老先生这么一说，我说那我不读《资治通鉴》了，改读《后汉书》吧。
教出来的都是食古不化，不知道形势和变通的坏人。
在权谋和政治斗争上是专家，但是却看不清历史大趋势。
难怪司马光反对王安石变法。书把人读死了。
这就一步跨入了当今的公民社会，省略了几千年。
但科技不发达，当时无法这样做。于是西方社会就迂回了一下，一两千年后才绕回来。中国几千年后实质上不仅原地踏步，老毛老习还试图回到周天子分天下之前的状态。
这大概就是几千年中西文明史的主要内涵的浓缩。
还有人拍马，以此证明毛会读书。上千年了，不少“读书人”津津乐道的还是帝王的dirty laundry，成天意淫帝师。精英要是跳不出这个怪圈，这个民族活该被condemned to dark ages。
其实才是个很小的水潭，群居动物都会。沉迷其中和小孩玩儿泥巴过家家无太大之异，可却乐此不疲了几千年。
《资治通鉴》的是Machiavelli's book, The Prince. 人们的评价是：
Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
现在网上还有人授业，如何commit a perfect murder呢。
Machiavelli's Prince has had a mixed reaction. Some considered it a straightforward description of the evil means used by bad rulers; others read in it evil recommendations to tyrants to help them maintain their power.[16] Even into recent times, some scholars, such as Leo Strauss, have restated the traditional opinion that Machiavelli can be considered a "teacher of evil".[17]
现在网上还有人授业，如何commit a perfect murder呢。