美国白左与欧洲白左对汽车排气标准近乎苛刻的要求，为电车的发展开阔了广阔的空间。Telsa做为电车业的龙头老大，前景更是无限看好。为何 short proof 的Telsa股价，会被摩根大通的分析师Ryan Brinkman定在$335？这个老犹的根据是啥？
百思不得起姐。。。
百思不得妻姐。。。
百思不得骑姐。。。
直到我看到下面这个报道，才恍然大悟！
尼玛，Brinkman 把Telsa的价位定在令人木凳狗呆的$335，是为了取悦老板！
原来，Tesla的马老板与摩根大通的大当家迪蒙，是不共戴天的冤家死对头。
The longstanding feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon has bubbled up over a breach of contract lawsuit, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.
What they're saying: “If JPM doesn't withdraw their lawsuit, I will give them a one star review on Yelp,” Musk told the Journal. “This is my final warning!”
“We have provided Tesla multiple opportunities to fulfill its contractual obligations, so it is unfortunate that they have forced this issue into litigation,” JPMorgan said in a statement last week.
Why it matters: Part of the bad blood between the two came to light last week when JPMorgan Chase sued Tesla over $162 million, alleging "breach of contract action" over stock warrants.
The big picture: Musk has "spurned" JPMorgan over the years as he sought to expand Tesla, per the Journal.
Conversations between the two companies have, "often upset one side or the other," and efforts by Dimon and Musk to reconcile have failed, the Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.
While JPMorgan was involved in Tesla's 2010 initial public stock offering and several subsequent transactions, other banks such as Goldman Sachs Group frequently took precedence, the Journal reported.
JPMorgan hasn't worked on any Tesla offerings or transactions since 2016, and Musk has turned to other banks for his personal loans, per the Journal.
花街分析师，是在美国金融界呼风唤雨的角色。他们对上市公司的评估，能直接把一个公司送入天堂，或打进地狱。
不过，在股市摸爬滚打的时间越长，越发现花街分析师能忽悠。说句难听的，信分析师的鬼话，还不如扔个硬币赌正反面更靠谱。尤其是摩根大通，让俺在中概股上赔得血本无归。。。
就在几天前，摩根大通的分析师又口出惊人之语：
April 4, 2022 06:49 AM ET (BZ Newswire) -- News
JP Morgan analyst Ryan Brinkman maintains Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) with a Underweight and raises the price target from $325 to $335.
Copyright [Sticker] 2022 Benzinga (BZ Newswire, http://www.benzinga.com/licensing). Benzinga does not provide investmentadvice. All rights reserved.
Write to [email protected] with any questions about this content. Subscribe to Benzinga Pro (http://pro.benzinga.com).
Telsa号称是做空者的地狱和天堂。这几年，有好几家对冲基金做空Telsa失败，赔得倾家荡产关门倒闭；也有很多家对冲基金，靠做空Telsa赚了个脑满肠肥。不过，无论怎麽做空，Telsa都是万里长城永不倒，总趋势是一直走高。即使俄乌战争造成的跌幅损失（最低跌到$766），也全部收复。昨天收盘，虽然跌了4.17%，但今天大盘市前已涨到$1061。
美国白左与欧洲白左对汽车排气标准近乎苛刻的要求，为电车的发展开阔了广阔的空间。Telsa做为电车业的龙头老大，前景更是无限看好。为何 short proof 的Telsa股价，会被摩根大通的分析师Ryan Brinkman定在$335？这个老犹的根据是啥？
百思不得起姐。。。
百思不得妻姐。。。
百思不得骑姐。。。
直到我看到下面这个报道，才恍然大悟！
尼玛，Brinkman 把Telsa的价位定在令人木凳狗呆的$335，是为了取悦老板！
原来，Tesla的马老板与摩根大通的大当家迪蒙，是不共戴天的冤家死对头。
The longstanding feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon has bubbled up over a breach of contract lawsuit, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.
What they're saying: “If JPM doesn't withdraw their lawsuit, I will give them a one star review on Yelp,” Musk told the Journal. “This is my final warning!”
“We have provided Tesla multiple opportunities to fulfill its contractual obligations, so it is unfortunate that they have forced this issue into litigation,” JPMorgan said in a statement last week.
Why it matters: Part of the bad blood between the two came to light last week when JPMorgan Chase sued Tesla over $162 million, alleging "breach of contract action" over stock warrants.
The big picture: Musk has "spurned" JPMorgan over the years as he sought to expand Tesla, per the Journal.
Conversations between the two companies have, "often upset one side or the other," and efforts by Dimon and Musk to reconcile have failed, the Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.
While JPMorgan was involved in Tesla's 2010 initial public stock offering and several subsequent transactions, other banks such as Goldman Sachs Group frequently took precedence, the Journal reported.
JPMorgan hasn't worked on any Tesla offerings or transactions since 2016, and Musk has turned to other banks for his personal loans, per the Journal.
NND，这就是所谓的神仙打架，股民遭殃。
俺原本打算跟高进场。。。仔细想了想，一咬牙一跺脚，再信分析师一次！先在路边呆着，静等$335 的馅饼从天上砸下来。。。
更多我的博客文章>>> 神仙打架，股民遭殃！ 俺是太太的降压药 跟着四哥走，很快就能吹牛 是卡庭重演？还是横店影视城？ 史海钩沉：扒一扒克里米亚与乌东的百年史
大师对 Rivian 的股价是怎么分析的？
他是old school，依旧用传统的P/E等标准来衡量现在的高端科技企业。
按照他的办法，现在美国四大High Tech的股价都会腰斩50-80%
我可不想逃难的时候，大家都走了，我还在充电。。。。
拜关公还是拜柴荣？
麦当劳就行
买进, 到时股票飞涨,四哥四嫂轻而易举变成亿万富翁!
现在电动车的股市，很像2000年时第一次 .com 热潮时的状况。那时很多的startup, 只有个想象中的上网经商的模式，就有大笔的热钱可烧。当时搞金融的教授们都很郁闷，因为没有任何理论可以解释这些股票的疯狂价格。就象现在有的电车企业还没有车可以卖，股票已经涨到天上去了。让我觉得市场再找那个最傻，最后接盘的人。
特斯拉不同，有产品有市场有业绩。
占星师对世界的预测很多时候是对的呀，几率不比现在金融教授们对股市预测的准确率低。
金融教授们的理论也有科学道理，跟占星师们的理论一样（天文学道理）。至于金融教授们最后弄出个什么新科学来，我们现在还不知道。就像一千年前的人们打破了脑袋也不能想出“天文学”这种东西来。
所以，金融教授们现在研究的理论，跟“金融”没有一根JB毛的关系。但，的确是有科学道理在里面。
只是，跟“金融”风马牛不相及
简称。。。。算命