Carlos Tejada Vaccine - Carlos Tejada Died Of A Heart Attack The Day After Getting His Covid Booster
vhttps://www.youtube.com/v/R4uDc87lQ3s
其中一个comment,疫苗问题很大啊:
Paul McArthur 2 days ago As a Canadian rural physician who supports the vaccine for higher risk patients and has to confront those who deny the benefit of the vaccines wrt reducing hospitalisations and death from covid, I have also been confronted with a rash of heart attacks in younger men (31,46,51,53 and 55 - none of whom were clinically at risk and one was fatal - all vaccinated within 6 months) who were either in my practice or that I cared for directly (via ER/inpatient) in the last 6 months that I have never seen in my 26 yr career. Could it be a coincidence ?- for sure... do I think a risk of true harm could be missed in a passive surveillance system in a very pro-vaccine environment, when even Pfizer's abandoned trial (unblinded after 6 months) showed a trend towards cardiac issues in the vaccinated group before they vaxxed the control group, and a group of cardiologists displayed a poster atthe AHAA in November 2021 that theorises a 2.5 x increased risk of heart attacks lasting at least 2 months after vaccination based on a collection ofinflammatory cardiac markers in higher risk patients - yes I certainly believe it is a possibility that anyone with a bit of critical thinking should ponder and at least admit it deserves more looking into.
【 在 villandry (闲士) 的大作中提到: 】 : Carlos Tejada Vaccine - Carlos Tejada Died Of A Heart Attack The Day After: Getting His Covid Booster : :
https://www.youtube.com/v/R4uDc87lQ3s
: : 其中一个comment,疫苗问题很大啊: : : Paul McArthur : 2 days ago : As a Canadian rural physician who supports the vaccine for higher risk : patients and has to confront those who deny the benefit of the vaccines wrt : reducing hospitalisations and death from covid, I have also been confronted : with a rash of heart attacks in younger men (31,46,51,53 and 55 - none of : whom were clinically at risk and one was fatal - all vaccinated within 6 : months) who were either in my practice or that I cared for directly (via ER/ : inpatient) in the last 6 months that I have never seen in my 26 yr career. : Could it be a coincidence ?- for sure... do I think a risk of true harm : could be missed in a passive surveillance system in a very pro-vaccine : environment, when even Pfizer's abandoned trial (unblinded after 6 months): showed a trend towards cardiac issues in the vaccinated group before they : vaxxed the control group, and a group of cardiologists displayed a poster at : the AHAA in November 2021 that theorises a 2.5 x increased risk of heart : attacks lasting at least 2 months after vaccination based on a collection of : inflammatory cardiac markers in higher risk patients - yes I certainly : believe it is a possibility that anyone with a bit of critical thinking : should ponder and at least admit it deserves more looking into.
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, THROMBOSIS, VASCULAR BIOLOGY SESSION TITLE: DAMPS, INFECTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR METABOLISM Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】 : https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 : ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, THROMBOSIS, VASCULAR BIOLOGY : SESSION TITLE: DAMPS, INFECTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR METABOLISM : Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial : Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a : Warning : Steven R Gundry : Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712 : Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, : CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which : ...................
纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道了他
的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
看名字是劳模啊。咋劳模也反华
赞美上帝
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道了他
: 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
这个逼造谣新疆“镇压”穆斯林，还造谣中国疫苗是“仓鼠卵巢细胞”制造
用仓鼠卵巢细胞是美国一所大学里开发的一项技术，已经使用了好几十年了
很多现代疫苗都是用那个技术造的
不是不报，时候未到，这下跟河山硕做伴去了，哈哈哈
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道了他
: 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
打了摩德纳1天后去了天国
被加强针活活打死了，赞美，撒花，哈里路亚
麻痹的以前 不就是cho么
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个逼造谣新疆“镇压”穆斯林，还造谣中国疫苗是“仓鼠卵巢细胞”制造
: 用仓鼠卵巢细胞是美国一所大学里开发的一项技术，已经使用了好几十年了
: 很多现代疫苗都是用那个技术造的
: 不是不报，时候未到，这下跟河山硕做伴去了，哈哈哈
:
: 【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: : 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: : 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道
了他
: : 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: : 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: : 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
京人，你打的哪一款booster？
我鳖骂不得！
天上麒麟原有种，穴中蝼蚁岂能逃
【 在 Manta (hehe) 的大作中提到: 】
: 我鳖骂不得！
才49岁
还有几个华女，是最积极的
能不能不要胡说八道？Hamster 那篇报道确实很糟糕，但那是新加坡华裔Sui-Lee Wee 写的，不是他写的。新疆没有压迫穆斯林？你眼睛瞎的？
你这种人的恶毒，丢中国人的脸。
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个逼造谣新疆“镇压”穆斯林，还造谣中国疫苗是“仓鼠卵巢细胞”制造
: 用仓鼠卵巢细胞是美国一所大学里开发的一项技术，已经使用了好几十年了
: 很多现代疫苗都是用那个技术造的
: 不是不报，时候未到，这下跟河山硕做伴去了，哈哈哈
他是心脏病突发去世，跟 booster 什么关系？他之前还喝过水呢，难道死因是喝水？
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道了他
: 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
死的好。死的妙，死的瓜瓜叫。好吧。看你心痛的样子，我好开心。
【 在 BR(别人) 的大作中提到: 】
: 能不能不要胡说八道？Hamster 那篇报道确实很糟糕，但那是新加坡华裔Sui-
Lee Wee
: 写的，不是他写的。新疆没有压迫穆斯林？你眼睛瞎的？
: 你这种人的恶毒，丢中国人的脸。
这个家伙抹黑中国死了
跟疫苗有个屁关系
从未有心脏病史
[在 BR (别人) 的大作中提到：]
:他是心脏病突发去世，跟 booster 什么关系？他之前还喝过水呢，难道死因是喝水？
fafafa
【 在 sanguan (不限) 的大作中提到: 】
: 赞美上帝
:
:
:
: 【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: : 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: : 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道
了他
: : 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: : 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: : 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
哈利路亚！
赞美疫苗
【 在 zhetian (叶凡) 的大作中提到: 】
: 从未有心脏病史
Factos 👍👀
小手还打不打布斯特？
口交人打了有没有心慌慌？
【 在 lsunspot 的大作中提到: 】
:
:fafafa
:
:【 在 sanguan (不限) 的大作中提到: 】
:: 赞美上帝
::
据说是打了booster四小时后死于医院。的确跟booster没有关系，又不是扎针时候被吓死的。
【 在 BR (别人) 的大作中提到: 】
: 他是心脏病突发去世，跟 booster 什么关系？他之前还喝过水呢，难道死因是喝水？
打 booster ferociously，被 ferociously 打死了
【 在 OAOTOC (ion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 据说是打了booster四小时后死于医院。的确跟booster没有关系，又不是扎针时候被吓
: 死的。
Carlos的booster instagram也是他生前最后一条in发于17日, nyt的讣告也说他死于17日. 他老婆公布死讯的tweeter发于18日下午5:58(也应该是当地时间）. 考虑到时差。我觉得他在首尔当地时间17日下午打了booster，夜间或第二天上午去世。时间不超过
24小时。
Moderna发力很迅猛。赞死了！
【 在 OAOTOC (ion) 的大作中提到: 】
: 据说是打了booster四小时后死于医院。的确跟booster没有关系，又不是扎针时候被吓
: 死的。
Carlos Tejada Vaccine - Carlos Tejada Died Of A Heart Attack The Day After
Getting His Covid Booster
vhttps://www.youtube.com/v/R4uDc87lQ3s
其中一个comment,疫苗问题很大啊:
Paul McArthur
2 days ago
As a Canadian rural physician who supports the vaccine for higher risk
patients and has to confront those who deny the benefit of the vaccines wrt
reducing hospitalisations and death from covid, I have also been confronted
with a rash of heart attacks in younger men (31,46,51,53 and 55 - none of
whom were clinically at risk and one was fatal - all vaccinated within 6
months) who were either in my practice or that I cared for directly (via ER/inpatient) in the last 6 months that I have never seen in my 26 yr career.
Could it be a coincidence ?- for sure... do I think a risk of true harm
could be missed in a passive surveillance system in a very pro-vaccine
environment, when even Pfizer's abandoned trial (unblinded after 6 months)
showed a trend towards cardiac issues in the vaccinated group before they
vaxxed the control group, and a group of cardiologists displayed a poster atthe AHAA in November 2021 that theorises a 2.5 x increased risk of heart
attacks lasting at least 2 months after vaccination based on a collection ofinflammatory cardiac markers in higher risk patients - yes I certainly
believe it is a possibility that anyone with a bit of critical thinking
should ponder and at least admit it deserves more looking into.
赞美疫苗booster,功德无量。台畜倭寇独轮运学着点，赶紧去打！
党委书记刚吃了麻辣火锅，今天你妈性舔党委书记的肛门的时候有福了
盹盹盹
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个逼造谣新疆“镇压”穆斯林，还造谣中国疫苗是“仓鼠卵巢细胞”制造
: 用仓鼠卵巢细胞是美国一所大学里开发的一项技术，已经使用了好几十年了
: 很多现代疫苗都是用那个技术造的
: 不是不报，时候未到，这下跟河山硕做伴去了，哈哈哈
:
: 【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: : 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: : 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道
了他
: : 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: : 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: : 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
mashallah
他就是到时间了。对疫苗有严重反应的，染新冠只能更糟。
打疫苗死的，大概率不打疫苗染新冠也是个死。
【 在 villandry (闲士) 的大作中提到: 】
: Carlos Tejada Vaccine - Carlos Tejada Died Of A Heart Attack The Day After: Getting His Covid Booster
:
:
:
: 其中一个comment,疫苗问题很大啊:
:
: Paul McArthur
: 2 days ago
: As a Canadian rural physician who supports the vaccine for higher risk
: patients and has to confront those who deny the benefit of the vaccines
wrt
: reducing hospitalisations and death from covid, I have also been
confronted
: with a rash of heart attacks in younger men (31,46,51,53 and 55 - none of
: whom were clinically at risk and one was fatal - all vaccinated within 6
: months) who were either in my practice or that I cared for directly (via
ER/
: inpatient) in the last 6 months that I have never seen in my 26 yr career.
: Could it be a coincidence ?- for sure... do I think a risk of true harm
: could be missed in a passive surveillance system in a very pro-vaccine
: environment, when even Pfizer's abandoned trial (unblinded after 6 months): showed a trend towards cardiac issues in the vaccinated group before they
: vaxxed the control group, and a group of cardiologists displayed a poster at
: the AHAA in November 2021 that theorises a 2.5 x increased risk of heart
: attacks lasting at least 2 months after vaccination based on a collection of
: inflammatory cardiac markers in higher risk patients - yes I certainly
: believe it is a possibility that anyone with a bit of critical thinking
: should ponder and at least admit it deserves more looking into.
有医学依据吗？病毒能在24小时之内导致心肌炎？我以为病毒需要先感染鼻腔，然后进入大脑或者肺部，再影响到其他器官呢。病毒至少会给人体一个免疫响应的时间。
【 在 StMicheal (archangel) 的大作中提到: 】
: 他就是到时间了。对疫苗有严重反应的，染新冠只能更糟。
: 打疫苗死的，大概率不打疫苗染新冠也是个死。
: https://www.youtube.com/v/R4uDc87lQ3s
: wrt
: confronted
: ER/
: at
: of
【 在 StMicheal (archangel) 的大作中提到: 】
: 他就是到时间了。对疫苗有严重反应的，染新冠只能更糟。
: 打疫苗死的，大概率不打疫苗染新冠也是个死。
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, THROMBOSIS, VASCULAR BIOLOGY
SESSION TITLE: DAMPS, INFECTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR METABOLISM
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial
Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a
Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm
of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)
which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and
cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score
has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test
drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to
the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline
IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the
norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these
changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
这个没问题，打疫苗都会激活免疫系统，炎症反应是正常的，没炎症反应也产生不了免疫反应获得免疫力。这个study的对照不包括其他传统疫苗的数据。其实这些反应传统
疫苗也都有。不过没有这次pandemic中这个大规模的实时监控数据收集。
感染新冠，那就是核动力mRNA疫苗，一天复制出10的11次方个病毒。
血栓，炎症风暴。
要比疫苗这点风险高几个数量级。
mRNA疫苗就是拆了生殖器的新冠病毒。
疫苗死的人士很不幸，这些人大概率不打疫苗基本就是新冠死，点儿背命苦。
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
: ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, THROMBOSIS, VASCULAR BIOLOGY
: SESSION TITLE: DAMPS, INFECTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR METABOLISM
: Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial
: Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a : Warning
: Steven R Gundry
: Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
: Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc,
Irvine,
: CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers
which
: ...................
我听说如果疫苗直接打到血管里，就会容易产生血栓。不知道这个有没有道理。
我看到好几个人在他去世那个推特下说，自己或亲友在打了第二针或加强针之后，心脏出问题或去世的
【 在 StMicheal (archangel) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个没问题，打疫苗都会激活免疫系统，炎症反应是正常的，没炎症反应也产生不了免
: 疫反应获得免疫力。这个study的对照不包括其他传统疫苗的数据。其实这些反应传统
: 疫苗也都有。不过没有这次pandemic中这个大规模的实时监控数据收集。
: 感染新冠，那就是核动力mRNA疫苗，一天复制出10的11次方个病毒。
: 血栓，炎症风暴。
: 要比疫苗这点风险高几个数量级。
: mRNA疫苗就是拆了生殖器的新冠病毒。
: 疫苗死的人士很不幸，这些人大概率不打疫苗基本就是新冠死，点儿背命苦。
: Irvine,
: which
应死尽死，这种垃圾死了，算美国新冠疫苗的功劳！
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 纽约时报负责中国报道的编辑死亡 却不提打过加强针
: 这名中国事务编辑名叫Carlos Tejada，今年49岁。《纽约时报》在12月22日报道了他
: 的死讯，并在文章中罗列了他的一些“成就”。但这些成就却大多是建立在对中国的抹
: 黑上，比如中国如何“镇压”新疆的穆斯林，以及中国如何“刻意隐瞒”新冠疫情的严
: 重性——他甚至还因这篇报道获得了美国的“普利策新闻奖”。
我喜欢美鳖加强针，多打死几个人渣吧！
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 被加强针活活打死了，赞美，撒花，哈里路亚