Rather, did Dalgleish specifically make any claim that 4 positively charged AAs in a row violate physics? The DM article quotes Dalgleish specifically..
Yup, that’s exactly what Dalgleish said to me. But I think Sørensen’s point is that Dalgleish was trying to provide a simple explanation for non-expert readers, which ended up not making sense to experts. What do you (+ others reading) think about Sørensen’s fuller explanation?
Rather, did Dalgleish specifically make any claim that 4 positively charged AAs in a row violate physics? The DM article quotes Dalgleish specifically..
Yup, that’s exactly what Dalgleish said to me. But I think Sørensen’s point is that Dalgleish was trying to provide a simple explanation for non-expert readers, which ended up not making sense to experts. What do you (+
others reading) think about Sørensen’s fuller explanation?