World news 'This is the end of Hong Kong': China pushes controversial security laws Proposed legislation would effectively end one country, two systems status, say critics 17:45 UTC Thursday, 21 May 2020 China plans to push through sweeping national security laws for Hong Kong at its annual meeting of parliament, in a move that critics say will effectively end the territory’s autonomy. Beijing has been making it clear it wants new security legislation passed since huge pro-democracy protests last year plunged Hong Kong into its deepest turmoil since it returned to Chinese rule in 1997. “National security is the bedrock underpinning the stability of the country,” said Zhang Yesui, spokesman for the National People’s Congress (NPC), the annual meeting of parliament that kicks off its full session on Friday. Zhang announced that delegates at the NPC – a largely rubber-stamping exercise – would “establish and improve a legal framework and mechanism for safeguarding national security” in Hong Kong. Condemnation of the proposal was swift, amid fears it could erase the “one country, two systems” framework that is supposed to grant the territory a high degree of autonomy. “This is the end of Hong Kong,” said the pro-democracy Honk Kong legislator Dennis Kwok. “Beijing, the Central People’s Government, has completely breached its promise to the Hong Kong people ... They are completely walking back on their obligation.” Article 23 of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, says the city must enact national security laws to prohibit “treason, secession, sedition [and] subversion” against the Chinese government. But the clause has never been implemented due to deeply held public fears it would curtail Hong Kong’s cherished rights, such as freedom of expression. An attempt to enact article 23 in 2003 was shelved after half a million people took to the streets in protest. 'What better time than now?' Fears China will use crises to cement grip on Hong Kong Read more By passing a law in the NPC, Chinese authorities will effectively bypass local opposition. Zhang said details of the proposal would be announced at NPC proceedings on Friday. The resolution is likely to be passed by China’s parliament next week. The announcement came as anti-government protests that have overwhelmed Hong Kong since last June approach their one-year anniversary. In recent months the protests have been paused as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and much of the world has been distracted. In the meantime Beijing has appeared more determined to definitively quell the demonstrations. Critics say the measure severely undermines Hong Kong’s legal framework, established under the terms of the former British colony’s handover to Chinese control in 1997. Under its Basic Law, Hong Kong is meant to enact security legislation on its own. “This spells the beginning of the end of Hong Kong under ‘one country, two systems’,” said Kenneth Chan, a political scientist at the Baptist University of Hong Kong. “It would mean also communist-style political struggles have trumped the rule of law and a dagger that has stabbed into the heart of the city’s liberal foundations,” he said. Sorry we can't display this here yet View on The Guardian “This is an expedient way to control Hong Kong,” said Johnny Lau, veteran China watcher and former journalist at the pro-China Wen Wei Po. Legal observers and human rights advocates worry the law will be used to target critics of the central government. Over the last year, Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have often described demonstrators as terrorists. “The obvious worry is that in China, we have seen ‘national security’, as well as related concepts like ‘counter-terrorism’, being used as an excuse for all sorts of human rights abuses, including the arbitrary arrest and imprisonment of dissidents, activists and human rights lawyers,” said Wilson Leung, a Hong Kong barrister who is part of the Progressive Lawyers Group. According to legal experts, Chinese lawmakers may be able to enforce the law in Hong Kong through a provision, article 18, of the Basic Law that allows certain national laws in mainland China to be applied in Hong Kong, either through declaration or local legislation. Martin Lee, the founder of the Democratic Party and a senior barrister who helped draft the Basic Law, said he insisted on the language in the document that “Hong Kong shall legislate on its own” national security laws. “This is a blatant breach of their promise, they have reversed things completely,” he said. “This is the wrong procedure.” He said the article 18 provision should apply to national laws only, not laws that specifically relate to Hong Kong. “If this precedent is set, then there is no need for [Hong Kong’s] legislative council,” he said. Eric Cheung, the director of clinical legal education of the faculty of law at the University of Hong Kong, said: “The problem here is that if they want to do it, of course they can do it in any way they want to. The reality is that we are powerless.” As China’s most important political event opens this week, after almost three months of delay, there are other signs of measures to stop the protests in Hong Kong. At the opening of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on Thursday, Wang Yang, the head of the political advisory body, said the party supported strengthening the ability of its members in Hong Kong to “speak out, stop chaos, and reinstate order”. Still, demonstrators, who have begun to take to the streets again, appeared more determined to pursue their demands. “At this time last year, didn’t we believe that the extradition law was sure to pass? Hong Kongers have always created miracles,” Nathan Law, a pro-democracy activist, wrote on Facebook. “People will continue to protest on streets,” tweeted Joshua Wong, an activist and former student leader during the 2014 protest movement. “Hong Kongers will not be scared off.” Additional reporting by *Lillian Yang* While we have you … … we hope you will consider making a contribution in support of the Guardian’s open, independent journalism. These are perilous times. In recent years, much of what the Guardian holds dear has been threatened – democracy, civility, science and truth. The need for a robust, free press has never been greater. The Guardian offers a unique, global perspective and in-depth coverage of international news from our correspondents around the world. We believe every one of us deserves equal access to fact-based news. So we’ve decided to keep Guardian journalism free for all readers, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This would not be possible without the generosity of our readers. We need support from readers like you to keep delivering and distributing quality journalism. Every contribution, however big or small, is valuable. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. Make a contribution 64
World news
'This is the end of Hong Kong': China pushes controversial security laws
Proposed legislation would effectively end one country, two systems status, say critics
17:45 UTC Thursday, 21 May 2020
China plans to push through sweeping national security laws for Hong Kong at its annual meeting of parliament, in a move that critics say will
effectively end the territory’s autonomy.
Beijing has been making it clear it wants new security legislation passed
since huge pro-democracy protests last year plunged Hong Kong into its
deepest turmoil since it returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
“National security is the bedrock underpinning the stability of the country,” said Zhang Yesui, spokesman for the National People’s Congress (NPC),
the annual meeting of parliament that kicks off its full session on Friday.
Zhang announced that delegates at the NPC – a largely rubber-stamping
exercise – would “establish and improve a legal framework and mechanism
for safeguarding national security” in Hong Kong.
Condemnation of the proposal was swift, amid fears it could erase the “one country, two systems” framework that is supposed to grant the territory a
high degree of autonomy.
“This is the end of Hong Kong,” said the pro-democracy Honk Kong
legislator Dennis Kwok. “Beijing, the Central People’s Government, has
completely breached its promise to the Hong Kong people ... They are
completely walking back on their obligation.”
Article 23 of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, says the city
must enact national security laws to prohibit “treason, secession, sedition [and] subversion” against the Chinese government.
But the clause has never been implemented due to deeply held public fears it would curtail Hong Kong’s cherished rights, such as freedom of expression. An attempt to enact article 23 in 2003 was shelved after half a million
people took to the streets in protest.
'What better time than now?' Fears China will use crises to cement grip on
Hong Kong
Read more
By passing a law in the NPC, Chinese authorities will effectively bypass
local opposition.
Zhang said details of the proposal would be announced at NPC proceedings on Friday. The resolution is likely to be passed by China’s parliament next
week.
The announcement came as anti-government protests that have overwhelmed Hong Kong since last June approach their one-year anniversary. In recent months the protests have been paused as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and
much of the world has been distracted. In the meantime Beijing has appeared more determined to definitively quell the demonstrations.
Critics say the measure severely undermines Hong Kong’s legal framework,
established under the terms of the former British colony’s handover to
Chinese control in 1997. Under its Basic Law, Hong Kong is meant to enact
security legislation on its own. “This spells the beginning of the end of
Hong Kong under ‘one country, two systems’,” said Kenneth Chan, a
political scientist at the Baptist University of Hong Kong.
“It would mean also communist-style political struggles have trumped the
rule of law and a dagger that has stabbed into the heart of the city’s
liberal foundations,” he said.
Sorry we can't display this here yet
View on The Guardian
“This is an expedient way to control Hong Kong,” said Johnny Lau, veteran China watcher and former journalist at the pro-China Wen Wei Po.
Legal observers and human rights advocates worry the law will be used to
target critics of the central government. Over the last year, Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have often described demonstrators as terrorists.
“The obvious worry is that in China, we have seen ‘national security’, as well as related concepts like ‘counter-terrorism’, being used as an
excuse for all sorts of human rights abuses, including the arbitrary arrest and imprisonment of dissidents, activists and human rights lawyers,” said
Wilson Leung, a Hong Kong barrister who is part of the Progressive Lawyers
Group.
According to legal experts, Chinese lawmakers may be able to enforce the law in Hong Kong through a provision, article 18, of the Basic Law that allows certain national laws in mainland China to be applied in Hong Kong, either
through declaration or local legislation.
Martin Lee, the founder of the Democratic Party and a senior barrister who
helped draft the Basic Law, said he insisted on the language in the document that “Hong Kong shall legislate on its own” national security laws.
“This is a blatant breach of their promise, they have reversed things
completely,” he said. “This is the wrong procedure.”
He said the article 18 provision should apply to national laws only, not
laws that specifically relate to Hong Kong. “If this precedent is set, then there is no need for [Hong Kong’s] legislative council,” he said.
Eric Cheung, the director of clinical legal education of the faculty of law at the University of Hong Kong, said: “The problem here is that if they
want to do it, of course they can do it in any way they want to. The reality is that we are powerless.”
As China’s most important political event opens this week, after almost
three months of delay, there are other signs of measures to stop the
protests in Hong Kong. At the opening of the Chinese People’s Political
Consultative Conference on Thursday, Wang Yang, the head of the political
advisory body, said the party supported strengthening the ability of its
members in Hong Kong to “speak out, stop chaos, and reinstate order”.
Still, demonstrators, who have begun to take to the streets again, appeared more determined to pursue their demands.
“At this time last year, didn’t we believe that the extradition law was
sure to pass? Hong Kongers have always created miracles,” Nathan Law, a pro-democracy activist, wrote on Facebook.
“People will continue to protest on streets,” tweeted Joshua Wong, an
activist and former student leader during the 2014 protest movement. “Hong Kongers will not be scared off.”
Additional reporting by *Lillian Yang*
While we have you …
… we hope you will consider making a contribution in support of the
Guardian’s open, independent journalism. These are perilous times. In
recent years, much of what the Guardian holds dear has been threatened –
democracy, civility, science and truth.
The need for a robust, free press has never been greater. The Guardian
offers a unique, global perspective and in-depth coverage of international
news from our correspondents around the world.
We believe every one of us deserves equal access to fact-based news. So we’ve decided to keep Guardian journalism free for all readers, regardless of
where they live or what they can afford to pay. This would not be possible
without the generosity of our readers.
We need support from readers like you to keep delivering and distributing
quality journalism. Every contribution, however big or small, is valuable.
Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute.
Thank you.
Make a contribution 64
This is long overdue, and it's only the very first step to get things
rectified.
2002年，香江才子黄霑曾上书香港立法局，阐述自己对香港《基本法》第二十三条立法的支持。在这封手写的信中，他就提到：“基本法第二十三条一日不立法，香港特区被人利用来反中国的机会就极大了……必将会害人害己，将香港推至非常危险的境地。”如今，一切皆按霑叔的剧本演出，信中所言之恶果也一一应验。但更可怕的是，香港人已经习惯了，习惯了动荡，习惯了揽炒，甚至习惯了选择性失明。
【 在 curiousami (归去来) 的大作中提到: 】
: This is long overdue, and it's only the very first step to get things
: rectified.
面瘫这是没办好，当时太软了
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 2002年，香江才子黄霑曾上书香港立法局，阐述自己对香港《基本法》第二十三条立法
: 的支持。在这封手写的信中，他就提到：“基本法第二十三条一日不立法，香港特区被
: 人利用来反中国的机会就极大了……必将会害人害己，将香港推至非常危险的境地。”
: 如今，一切皆按霑叔的剧本演出，信中所言之恶果也一一应验。但更可怕的是，香港人
: 已经习惯了，习惯了动荡，习惯了揽炒，甚至习惯了选择性失明。
港青可以全球大游行
草，一片煽风点火，把火烧得越旺越好
看各媒体的港残记者一片哀嚎
真是喜闻乐见
你们还要榄炒，就给你们榄炒，as you wish
【 在 subsub1 (Reaper Man) 的大作中提到: 】
: 看各媒体的港残记者一片哀嚎
: 真是喜闻乐见
高压下，消灭一切不同意见的维稳，这和共产党自己洗脑说的国民党黑暗时代一摸一样。挂羊头卖狗肉而已。
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: 高压下，消灭一切反对意见的维稳，这和共产党自己洗脑说的国民党黑暗时代一摸一样
给脸你不要，还想着上天呢，想上天没人拦你，来美国也不错，但美国的国安法也会让你痛不欲生
香港2002、2003年可能还是个角，现在就是过气网红了
据说那堆HK烂人已经开始往台湾跑了。
应该是早有风声，前几天已经有泛民在讨论去台湾再建一个香港了
【 在 subsub1 (Reaper Man) 的大作中提到: 】
: 看各媒体的港残记者一片哀嚎
: 真是喜闻乐见
这个应该支持！
【 在 wljyx (nescaf) 的大作中提到: 】
: 据说那堆HK烂人已经开始往台湾跑了。
: 应该是早有风声，前几天已经有泛民在讨论去台湾再建一个香港了
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 面瘫这是没办好，当时太软了
vhttp://www.youtube.com/v/FUyEAD4JfV0
vhttp://www.youtube.com/v/eXvPPtHDHsU
那次香港七一五十万人游行反对23条立法是在2003年，一晃都17年过去了
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 2002年，香江才子黄霑曾上书香港立法局，阐述自己对香港《基本法》第二十三条立法
: 的支持。在这封手写的信中，他就提到：“基本法第二十三条一日不立法，香港特区被
: 人利用来反中国的机会就极大了……必将会害人害己，将香港推至非常危险的境地。”
: 如今，一切皆按霑叔的剧本演出，信中所言之恶果也一一应验。但更可怕的是，香港人
: 已经习惯了，习惯了动荡，习惯了揽炒，甚至习惯了选择性失明。
【 在 curiousami (归去来) 的大作中提到: 】
: 那次香港七一五十万人游行反对23条立法是在2003年，一晃都17年过去了
在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: 高压下，消灭一切不同意见的维稳，这和共产党自己洗脑说的国民党黑暗时代一摸一样
: 。挂羊头卖狗肉而已。
你这个呆瓜 在美国没举过中国国旗？
发信人: sundevil072 (sundevil), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 香港国安法出台在即，西媒港汕都一片哀嚎
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri May 22 12:53:46 2020, 美东)
在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: 高压下，消灭一切不同意见的维稳，这和共产党自己洗脑说的国民党黑暗时代一摸一样
: 。挂羊头卖狗肉而已。
【 在 sundevil072 (sundevil) 的大作中提到: 】
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
华人举中国国旗时恳求习近平解放美国了？
【 在 addadd9999 (haha99) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你这个呆瓜 在美国没举过中国国旗？
: 发信人: sundevil072 (sundevil), 信区: Military
: 标 题: Re: 香港国安法出台在即，西媒港汕都一片哀嚎
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri May 22 12:53:46 2020, 美东)
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
"一上访就是疯子，一上街就是闹事，一揭露就是造谣，一理论就是煽动，一批评就是
颠覆， 一提美国就是卖国，一说台湾就是分裂，一维权就是抗法，一反抗就是暴乱！"
【 在 sundevil072 (sundevil) 的大作中提到: 】
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
【 在 jojoyz (jojoyz) 的大作中提到: 】
: 给脸你不要，还想着上天呢，想上天没人拦你，来美国也不错，但美国的国安法也会让
: 你痛不欲生
"误判0：中国40年来经济快速发展都是自己努力的结果。
误判1：2016年希拉里会当选为美国总统。
误判2：中美不可能爆发贸易战，因为彼此经济联系太紧密。
误判3：贸易战会很快结束，大不了买点波音飞机和高通芯片。
误判4：因为贸易战，美国经济会遭受重创（所谓“小打小赢，大打大赢”）
误判5：其他西方国家会帮助中国维护全球化，共同反对美国。
误判6：美国国内会因为政治分裂出现强大的亲华派。
误判7：新冠肺炎传染性不强。
后面将会发生的误判：
误判8：中美不会脱钩
误判9：拜登会击败川普当选美国总统
误判10：脱钩以后，美国用不了多久就会陷入经济混乱。
误判11：其他发展中国家无力接替中国的位置。
误判12：俄罗斯、日本、德国、拉美和非洲国家会帮助中国一起反对美国。
误判13：中国离开了西方自由世界也可以继续快速发展。
误判14：会有第二次改革开放。
然后就没有然后了，中国版叶利钦就该开着坦克冲进中南海，炮击紫光阁了。"
川巨巨这个判断，你也别下的太早，呵呵，
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: "误判0：中国40年来经济快速发展都是自己努力的结果。
: 误判1：2016年希拉里会当选为美国总统。
: 误判2：中美不可能爆发贸易战，因为彼此经济联系太紧密。
: 误判3：贸易战会很快结束，大不了买点波音飞机和高通芯片。
: 误判4：因为贸易战，美国经济会遭受重创（所谓“小打小赢，大打大赢”）
: 误判5：其他西方国家会帮助中国维护全球化，共同反对美国。
: 误判6：美国国内会因为政治分裂出现强大的亲华派。
: 误判7：新冠肺炎传染性不强。
: 后面将会发生的误判：
: 误判8：中美不会脱钩
: ...................
"National Security" bill to prohibit political dissent, through "terrorism" and "foreign influence."
is the definition of Ameicas Patriot Act.
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: "误判0：中国40年来经济快速发展都是自己努力的结果。
: 误判1：2016年希拉里会当选为美国总统。
: 误判2：中美不可能爆发贸易战，因为彼此经济联系太紧密。
: 误判3：贸易战会很快结束，大不了买点波音飞机和高通芯片。
: 误判4：因为贸易战，美国经济会遭受重创（所谓“小打小赢，大打大赢”）
: 误判5：其他西方国家会帮助中国维护全球化，共同反对美国。
: 误判6：美国国内会因为政治分裂出现强大的亲华派。
: 误判7：新冠肺炎传染性不强。
: 后面将会发生的误判：
: 误判8：中美不会脱钩
: ...................
你找的这些误判充其量是站在你的立场上来看的，中国的持续发展也都是在你这些所谓的误判上一步一步来的，如果真是误判了美帝何必那么紧张，直接让中国误判去，不用管，中国自然是会自己崩溃
可是按目前的形势来看，倒是中国的这些误判让中国更上一层楼，一个发展中国家居然能让一个超发达国家痛苦不堪，这到底是中国误判呢还是美国就是一个绣花枕头
所谓的这些误判基本就是在总加速师上台以后这几年的事，所以你的中国的持续发展是建立在误判基础上是个伪命题
【 在 jojoyz (jojoyz) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你找的这些误判充其量是站在你的立场上来看的，中国的持续发展也都是在你这些所谓
: 的误判上一步一步来的，如果真是误判了美帝何必那么紧张，直接让中国误判去，不用
: 管，中国自然是会自己崩溃
: 可是按目前的形势来看，倒是中国的这些误判让中国更上一层楼，一个发展中国家居然
: 能让一个超发达国家痛苦不堪，这到底是中国误判呢还是美国就是一个绣花枕头
按照毒轮运的判断，中国20年前就该崩溃了
【 在 jojoyz (jojoyz) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你找的这些误判充其量是站在你的立场上来看的，中国的持续发展也都是在你这些所谓
: 的误判上一步一步来的，如果真是误判了美帝何必那么紧张，直接让中国误判去，不用
: 管，中国自然是会自己崩溃
: 可是按目前的形势来看，倒是中国的这些误判让中国更上一层楼，一个发展中国家居然
: 能让一个超发达国家痛苦不堪，这到底是中国误判呢还是美国就是一个绣花枕头
vhttp://www.youtube.com/v/wmcnMoZ6ppg
SB
【 在 TopHuang (Raptor) 的大作中提到: 】
: 高压下，消灭一切不同意见的维稳，这和共产党自己洗脑说的国民党黑暗时代一摸一样
: 。挂羊头卖狗肉而已。
傻逼吧你，你试试在美国街上举中国国旗，让解放军来解放美国？五分钟警察就来毙了你个共匪
【 在 addadd9999 (haha99) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你这个呆瓜 在美国没举过中国国旗？
: 发信人: sundevil072 (sundevil), 信区: Military
: 标 题: Re: 香港国安法出台在即，西媒港汕都一片哀嚎
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri May 22 12:53:46 2020, 美东)
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
早就该立国安法了，笑看狗粮们的哀嚎
看狗粮一片嚎很有喜感,非常舒适
【 在 berryblack (berry) 的大作中提到: 】
: 早就该立国安法了，笑看狗粮们的哀嚎
好像看到了破熊的影子
港灿有点脑子，拉老黄瓜榄炒
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你们还要榄炒，就给你们榄炒，as you wish
墨西哥国旗这里也很多，建议枪毙一批？
【 在 sundevil072 (sundevil) 的大作中提到: 】
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
2002年天朝GDP 1.471 T
2002年香港GDP 0.166 T
超过11%，黄霑 就是在挑拨中美关系，断送天朝改开的大好局面
【 在 orangedot (明月照大江) 的大作中提到: 】
: 2002年，香江才子黄霑曾上书香港立法局，阐述自己对香港《基本法》第二十三条立法
: 的支持。在这封手写的信中，他就提到：“基本法第二十三条一日不立法，香港特区被
: 人利用来反中国的机会就极大了……必将会害人害己，将香港推至非常危险的境地。”
: 如今，一切皆按霑叔的剧本演出，信中所言之恶果也一一应验。但更可怕的是，香港人
: 已经习惯了，习惯了动荡，习惯了揽炒，甚至习惯了选择性失明。
你举着中国国旗，攻占美帝国会，看看美帝swat team会干嘛。土共真的很仁慈了
【 在 addadd9999 (haha99) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你这个呆瓜 在美国没举过中国国旗？
: 发信人: sundevil072 (sundevil), 信区: Military
: 标 题: Re: 香港国安法出台在即，西媒港汕都一片哀嚎
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri May 22 12:53:46 2020, 美东)
: 在中国的地盘，举着美帝的国旗提意见，没按着叛国罪毙了，还来逼逼。
现在中国gdp是香港的40倍， 蚂蚁跟大象提揽抄
【 在 tran299 (熟道勇释放很少) 的大作中提到: 】
: 2002年天朝GDP 1.471 T
: 2002年香港GDP 0.166 T
: 超过11%，黄霑 就是在挑拨中美关系，断送天朝改开的大好局面
香港回归以前是英国治理，从回归后到现在是中美共治，国安法执行以后才是一国两制：
你们这些鼠目寸光的傻逼，才显出黄霑深谋远虑
【 在 tran299 (熟道勇释放很少) 的大作中提到: 】
: 2002年天朝GDP 1.471 T
: 2002年香港GDP 0.166 T
: 超过11%，黄霑 就是在挑拨中美关系，断送天朝改开的大好局面
同喜
【在 Whazzup(what?)的大作中提到：】
：看狗粮一片嚎很有喜感,非常舒适
：