搞不好连邮局都要关门了

W
WCNMLGB
楼主 (未名空间)

How coronavirus could be the ‘final straw’ for the U.S Postal Service
The U.S. Postal Service has been in trouble for some time. Now, the
coronavirus crisis has come along and made everything much worse.
Mail volume (and the accompanying revenue) could be down 50% this year,
according to some estimates. The already teetering Postal Service could run out of money soon. That fear, combined with widespread concerns about letter carriers exposed to the virus, has put some lawmakers into a fatalistic
mindset.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) put it bluntly: “We need to start thinking in
those apocalyptic terms,” he said in an interview with Yahoo Finance
Tuesday, “because we are about to face the apocalypse.”
The current crisis is “in many ways the final straw,” said Connolly, who
is chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees the Postal Service. He
believes that without some sort of intervention it will run out of cash in
June.
‘There's a growing anxiety’
Questions of safety are now dogging the service. “There's a growing anxiety that they're at risk and that there's not sufficient resources to protect
them even in the most minimal of ways like hand sanitizers or gloves or the like,” Connolly said.
Two weeks ago, ProPublica published a report saying that some postal
employees were continuing to work after displaying COVID-19 symptoms, and
seemingly healthy employees had insufficient protection against the virus.
Postmaster General Megan J. Brennan responded to some of the concerns on
Wednesday during a Board of Governors session. "We are promoting healthy
behaviors and protocols and encouraging any employee who feels sick to stay home,” she said. “In order to further encourage this behavior, we have
updated our leave policies to allow liberal use of leave."
Brennan also acknowledged some supply problems in the recent past saying, "
we are continuing to work to overcome gaps in the supply chain to insure
that our employees have access to hand sanitizer masks and gloves."
But questions are likely to keep coming. Sen. Cory Booker and other New
Jersey Democrats wrote a letter to Postmaster General Brennan last week
expressing a series of concerns and questions. On Tuesday, Sen. Bernie
Sanders sent another letter raising similar questions.
A spokesperson for Booker told Yahoo Finance that his office has not
received an answer but remains hopeful that we can work with the service “
to implement stronger workplace protections for the safety and well-being of USPS employees as well as the millions of Americans who depend on their
services.”
"The health and well-being of our employees is always our first thought in
facing the COVID challenge," the Postmaster General said on Wednesday. She
also underlined that the CDC, WHO, and Surgeon General all “have all said
that there is very low risk that this virus is spread through mail which
should be a comfort to us all and to the public.”
Connolly agreed the risk of transmission via mail is low, but “if we made
sure that all of our postal workers had access to hand sanitizers and gloves, we could come close to eliminating the risk.” A lack of guidance or
protection for letter carriers “is very imprudent and puts people at some
risk. Not a high risk, but a risk.”
The USPS has made one change: it no longer requires customer signatures.
Letter carriers will instead – from a distance – request the customer’s
information and enter it themselves.
‘They're going to run out of cash in June’
The USPS operates as a self-supporting, independent federal agency – sort
of halfway between an independent business and a government agency. It likes to tout that the service “receives no tax dollars,” instead paying for
itself from the sale of postage, products and services.
During the phase 3 negotiations, Connolly and other House Democrats proposed changing that by eliminating outstanding debt and allotting $25 billion to further shore up USPS finances. They even wrote a letter to Sen. Mitch
McConnell “to seek your urgent help.”
They also want to repeal a mandate imposed in the Postal Act of 2006, which they say denies the USPS a chance to be profitable, arguing that the rule
requires the Postal Service to pre-fund retirement health benefits for its
employees. It’s a financial burden that puts “the Postal Service in a
straight jacket,” according to Connolly, and has been the focus of repeal
attempts for years.
The push didn’t work. The final package, signed into law by President Trump last Friday, included $10 billion in additional borrowing authority with
strings attached.
The National Association of Letter Carriers, a union representing postal
employees, responded: “That is woefully inadequate.”
Connolly says that some of the conditions on the $10 billion (including more of a Treasury role in management) was “an unacceptable condition for
everybody,” and he still sees the USPS going out of business within months if nothing is done.
Then USPS and ‘Phase 4’ negotiations
The Postal Service has been gradually shrinking for years as outfits like
UPS and Fedex Express (not to mention email) encroach further on its
business. Total mail volume has shrunk from 170.9 billion pieces of mail in 2010 to 146.4 billion in 2018.
Yet advocates note the USPS still serves important functions, from
delivering prescription drugs to Social Security checks. It also remains the only option in some rural areas where; as the National Association of
Letter Carriers points out, “private companies rely on the USPS for last-
mile delivery.”
The USPS is also how millions of Americans who don’t have direct deposit
information on file with the IRS will receive their $1,200 stimulus checks.
And then there’s perhaps the most politically fraught factor: “We're also counting on the Postal Service to save our election process,” Connolly said amid questions about whether November’s elections will need to be done
through the mail given concerns about voting in person. “What if there's no Postal Service?” he said. ”Well, that could affect the outcome of an
election.”
Trump has not discussed the Postal Service at length since the coronavirus
crisis began. On March 23 he thanked “the hardworking men and women of
Federal Express, UPS, the United States Postal Service, and the truckers who are maintaining our supply chains and supply lines.”
But Connolly claims that, behind the scenes, Trump himself was instrumental in killing aid to the USPS. He said Trump personally axed direct aid to the service. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “said this came directly from Trump and she has reiterated that more than once,” Connolly said.
The White House did not offer comment on Connolly’s claim.
On Tuesday, during an appearance on MSNBC, Pelosi reiterated that Postal
Service funding is crucial in a phase 4 deal largely to keep voting by mail as a viable option.
“I'm going to continue like a dog and a bone on this issue,” said Connolly, “because we won't appreciate the criticality of it until the worst
happens, and I'm trying to prevent the worst from happening.”
Ben Werschkul is a producer for Yahoo Finance in Washington, DC.
Read more:
Coronavirus crisis has exposed ‘raw underbelly’ issues in economy: expert
Here's what’s in the $2 trillion coronavirus stimulus deal for businesses
Public health expert: Now is the time to ‘double down on social distancing’
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn,
YouTube, and reddit.

p
pacificnw

只是那个公立的美国邮局
s
shangzh

只是公立那个?你只不知道邮局的网络,UPS和FEDEX都需要?偏远地区,没有哪个私人公司会有点,不赚钱而赔钱的事,私人公司会做?
s
shangzh

邮局停工就要天下大乱