And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It&# 39;s becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down, unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S. in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms.
He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. "Aspects of the Chinese government, [the] Chinese public-security service, appear to be terrified of free speech, and while one might say that means something awful is happening in the country, I actually think that is a very optimistic sign, because it means that speech can still cause reform and that the power structure is still inherently political as opposed to fiscal.
So journalism and writing are capable of achieving change, and that is why Chinese authorities are so scared of it."
On the other hand, in the U.S. and much of the West, he said, "the basic elements of society have been so heavily fiscalized through contractual obligations that political change doesn't seem to result in economic change, which in other words means that political change doesn't result in change."
【 在 newIdRobot (新器人) 的大作中提到: 】 : 加州大火，澳大利亚大火，公众舆论都骂起来了，也没人行动。西方金权勾连的责任义 : 务合约化让舆论带来不了改变。 : 中共当局之所以害怕舆论，是因为政权和金钱还相对分立。记者真实报道还能带来改变。 : And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It&# : 39;s becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of : openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down, : unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other : things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S. : in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms. : He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. " : ...................
加州大火，澳大利亚大火，公众舆论都骂起来了，也没人行动。西方金权勾连的责任义务合约化让舆论带来不了改变。
中共当局之所以害怕舆论，是因为政权和金钱还相对分立。记者真实报道还能带来改变。
And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It&#
39;s becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down,
unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other
things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S.
in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms.
He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. "Aspects of the Chinese government, [the] Chinese public-security service,
appear to be terrified of free speech, and while one might say that means
something awful is happening in the country, I actually think that is a very optimistic sign, because it means that speech can still cause reform and
that the power structure is still inherently political as opposed to fiscal.
So journalism and writing are capable of achieving change, and that is why
Chinese authorities are so scared of it."
On the other hand, in the U.S. and much of the West, he said, "the basic elements of society have been so heavily fiscalized through contractual
obligations that political change doesn't seem to result in economic
change, which in other words means that political change doesn't result in change."
说得很到位
还有美国流感大爆发
美华加华澳华都被洗脑，对近在咫尺的流感逆来顺受，反而对遥远中国的病毒上蹿下跳
【 在 newIdRobot (新器人) 的大作中提到: 】
: 加州大火，澳大利亚大火，公众舆论都骂起来了，也没人行动。西方金权勾连的责任义
: 务合约化让舆论带来不了改变。
: 中共当局之所以害怕舆论，是因为政权和金钱还相对分立。记者真实报道还能带来改变。
: And where does the U.S. fall between the two categories? He said, "It&#
: 39;s becoming more closed" as a society, and its "relative degree of
: openness ... probably peaked in about 1978, and has been on the way down,
: unfortunately, since." That, he said, was a result of, among other
: things, America's enormous economy, which calibrates power in the U.S.
: in economic, or as he said, "fiscal," terms.
: He pointed out that, today, China may be easier to reform than the U.S. "
: ...................
政客无需为国家前途负责，就像员工无需为公司的未来负责一样。
at will已经深入人心，习以为常。
既然公司/人民 给钱/选我 干活，那么没钱/不选我，我当然就不干活不负责任了。
属实
【在 hardpack(hardpack)的大作中提到：】
：政客无需为国家前途负责，就像员工无需为公司的未来负责一样。
：