Abstract Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22 /- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42 /-12 above the norm to 86 /-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
【 在 mrnqs (三月) 的大作中提到: 】 : 新冠疫苗在某些人里导致了心肌炎心包炎。大部分专家认为发生率很低，不足以抵消它 : 在疫情中起到的保护作用。但是疫苗对心脏的伤害仅仅是那些发了心肌炎心包炎的人吗 : ？那些没有发病的人心脏就完全没有损伤吗？来看看下面这篇文章 : ttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 : Abstract : Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, : CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which : generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new : Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm : of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, : ...................
【 在 potassium(镇) 的大作中提到: 】 <br>: according to twitter, this science is "unsafe" <br>: https://twitter.com/sethjlevy/status/1466443864378679318 <br>: Irvine, <br>: which <br>: , <br>
This cardiologist also says another British Institute saw similar findings but wouldn't publish because afraid of losing funding. He also cited the AHA abstract and that anecdotally there are more heart attacks among the young since vaccines rolled out. So there should be an investigation to make sure its not vaccines causing it. I think this request is quite fair. Most anti covid vaxers just need transparency and freedom to choose what goes into our bodies especially when their is a real risk...... is that too much to ask?
【 在 mrnqs 的大作中提到: 】 : :新冠疫苗在某些人里导致了心肌炎心包炎。大部分专家认为发生率很低，不足以抵消 它在疫情中起到的保护作用。但是疫苗对心脏的伤害仅仅是那些发了心肌炎心包炎的人吗？那些没有发病的人心脏就完全没有损伤吗？来看看下面这篇文章 : : : :ttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 : :Abstract :Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new :Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm :of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) :which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and
新冠疫苗在某些人里导致了心肌炎心包炎。大部分专家认为发生率很低，不足以抵消它在疫情中起到的保护作用。但是疫苗对心脏的伤害仅仅是那些发了心肌炎心包炎的人吗？那些没有发病的人心脏就完全没有损伤吗？来看看下面这篇文章
ttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm
of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)
which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and
cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score
has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test
drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to
the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline
IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22 /- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42 /-12 above the norm to 86 /-31 above the
norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these
changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
according to twitter, this science is "unsafe"
https://twitter.com/sethjlevy/status/1466443864378679318
【 在 mrnqs (三月) 的大作中提到: 】
: 新冠疫苗在某些人里导致了心肌炎心包炎。大部分专家认为发生率很低，不足以抵消它
: 在疫情中起到的保护作用。但是疫苗对心脏的伤害仅仅是那些发了心肌炎心包炎的人吗
: ？那些没有发病的人心脏就完全没有损伤吗？来看看下面这篇文章
: ttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
: Abstract
: Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc,
Irvine,
: CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers
which
: generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new
: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm
: of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine,
: ...................
呵呵，踩着谁的尾巴了？推特说AHA不该出来搅局。这是多害怕民众知道点真相？
【 在 potassium(镇) 的大作中提到: 】
<br>: according to twitter, this science is "unsafe"
<br>: https://twitter.com/sethjlevy/status/1466443864378679318
<br>: Irvine,
<br>: which
<br>: ,
<br>
Definitely unsafe. Hurts snowflake’s feelings
【 在 potassium(镇) 的大作中提到: 】
: according to twitter, this science is "unsafe"
: https://twitter.com/sethjlevy/status/1466443864378679318
: Irvine,
: which
: ,
This cardiologist also says another British Institute saw similar findings
but
wouldn't publish because afraid of losing funding. He also cited the AHA
abstract and that anecdotally there are more heart attacks among the young
since vaccines rolled out. So there should be an investigation to make sure its not vaccines causing it. I think this request is quite fair. Most anti covid vaxers just need transparency and freedom to choose what goes into our bodies especially when their is a real risk...... is that too much to ask?
vhttps://www.youtube.com/v/gJ8t0qQ5R4I
医生没医德 不敢站出来
这个动动脑筋就知道了。有临床改变，就肯定有亚临床病变，关键是数量。
【 在 mrnqs 的大作中提到: 】
:
:新冠疫苗在某些人里导致了心肌炎心包炎。大部分专家认为发生率很低，不足以抵消
它在疫情中起到的保护作用。但是疫苗对心脏的伤害仅仅是那些发了心肌炎心包炎的人吗？那些没有发病的人心脏就完全没有损伤吗？来看看下面这篇文章
:
:
:
:ttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
:
:Abstract
:Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers
which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a
new
:Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm :of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)
:which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and