In her presentation, Ms. Meng stated, among other things, that Huawei’s relationship with Skycom was “normal business cooperation” and “normal and controllable business cooperation,” and she described Skycom as a “ partner,” a “business partner of Huawei,” and a “third party Huawei works with” in Iran. Those statements were untrue because, as Ms. Meng knew, Skycom was not a business partner of, or a third party working with, Huawei; instead, Huawei controlled Skycom, and Skycom employees were really Huawei employees. It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to know that Huawei controlled Skycom. In addition, Ms. Meng stated that Huawei“was once a shareholder of Skycom” but had “sold all its shares in Skycom.” Those statements were untrue, because, as Ms. Meng knew, Huawei had “sold” its shares to an entity that Huawei controlled. Specifically, Huawei transferred Skycom shares from a Huawei subsidiary (Hua Ying) to another entity that was controlled by Huawei (Canicula). It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to know that Skycom was transferred fromone Huawei controlled entity to another. Finally, Ms. Meng stated that Huawei “operates in Iran in strict compliance with applicable laws, regulations and sanctions” and that “there has been no violation of exportcontrol regulations” by “Huawei or any third party Huawei works with.” These statements were untrue because Huawei’s operation of Skycom, which caused the Financial Institutions to provide prohibited services, including banking services, for Huawei’s Iran-based business while Huawei concealed Skycom’s link to Huawei, was in violation of the U.S.Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560. Moreover, during the Relevant Time Period, Huawei caused Skycom to conduct approximately $100 million worth of U.S.-dollar transactions through Financial Institution 1 that cleared through the United States, at least some of which supported its workin Iran in violation of U.S. law, including $7.5 million for Iran-based contractors from the U.K. staffing company to do work in Iran.
【 在 DreamTiger (钟爱你一生) 的大作中提到: 】 : 又夹杂私货。你倒是把所谓“华为通过Skycom向伊朗销售了包含美国芯片在内的设备， : 违反了美国对伊朗的制裁和《出口管制法》；”这段话从美国公布的文件中找出原文来。 : In her presentation, Ms. Meng stated, among other things, that Huawei’s : relationship with Skycom was “normal business cooperation” and “normal : and controllable business cooperation,” and she described Skycom as a “ : partner,” a “business partner of Huawei,” and a “third party Huawei : works with” in Iran. Those statements were untrue because, as Ms. Meng knew : , Skycom was not a business partner of, or a third party working with, : Huawei; instead, Huawei controlled Skycom, and Skycom employees were really : Huawei employees. It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to : ...................
9月24日，华为“公主”孟晚舟突然获释返回中国的消息成为海外各大媒体的焦点，中
共党媒新华社在几个小时后也发了一篇通稿，称“经中国政府不懈努力，当地时间9月
24日，孟晚舟女士已经乘坐中国政府包机离开加拿大，即将回到祖国，并与家人团聚”。
新华社简短通稿透露的两点重要信息是：一、中共政府在孟晚舟事件上一直在努力，近三年来花了不少力气才将其救回来；二、在孟晚舟获释后的第一时间，中共政府就包机让孟晚舟回国。国人们不妨想一想，在过去的几十年中，对于在国外遇险的普通中国人，哪一个让中共花了如此大力气地营救过？不仅如此，在其被救下后，还立即不惜价钱包机让其回国，孟晚舟究竟是何等重要的人物让北京当局如此上心？
的确，在孟晚舟2018年底在加拿大温哥华转机时被拘捕，到现今与美国司法部达成和解协议被释放，中共与华为公司为了将她营救回国，可谓是殚精竭虑。可见的具体体现在：一、不惜重金聘用顶级律师团队，利用西方司法重证据的审判体系，为其百般开脱，一再拖延被引渡日期。
二、借舆论施压。中共国内外发动舆论战，利用民族主义情绪，鼓动中国人和加拿大当地华人，为孟晚舟呐喊和站台，抨击美国和加拿大正常的司法程序。
三、政治上施压。中共驻加拿大大使在当地媒体公开为孟晚舟辩解，还几次作秀“慰问”孟晚舟，目的不仅仅是给孟晚舟和国内被愚弄的民众看，更是借此给加拿大政府施压，让其明白中共站在孟晚舟和华为身后。
四、采用人质外交，向加拿大和美国施压。中共在孟晚舟被拘捕后以涉嫌刺探情报为由，拘捕加拿大前外交官康明凯（Michael Kovrig）和商人史佩弗（Michael Spavor），今年8月，还判处史佩弗11年有期徒刑。尽管中共当局一直否认这两起案件存在关联，
但从孟晚舟获释回国的同时，两名加拿大人也获释飞回加拿大看，中共无疑又将自己的脸打得啪啪响。
至于幕后北京是否在加拿大、美国政府内部运作，因缺乏足够资讯，无法推断，但也并非不可能存在。不知是北京当局的“不懈努力”有了成果，还是美司法部认为惩罚孟晚舟个人并非主要目的，其针对的是华为，且与孟晚舟达成某种“认罪”协议也可达成目的，并借此可以将加拿大人质营救回国也是不错的交易。因此，在双方律师的紧张的谈判后，孟晚舟同意了美司法部条件，获释回国。
北京当局看起来是将孟晚舟成功捞了回来，但这样的成功也仅仅是将人捞了回来，孟晚舟被指控的罪名却没有脱掉。按照中共媒体宣扬，孟晚舟并没有认罪，但事实真相却是这样的：孟签署的是一份暂缓起诉的和解协议，根据协议，检方将起诉的文件延迟到
2022年12月1日，也就是孟晚舟被捕四年后将撤销针对她的指控，前提是她需要满足某
些条件。
在和解协议中，孟承认了几乎所有美国司法部对她的事实指控，而且是不得反悔或改口。这些指控包括：香港公司Skycom在存续期间是受华为控制的；华为通过Skycom向伊朗销售了包含美国芯片在内的设备，违反了美国对伊朗的制裁和《出口管制法》；作为
Skycom前首席财务官的孟晚舟隐瞒了华为与Skycom的真实关系。
孟晚舟在签署后，如果违反协议，或作出其它声明，如对外界称她非自愿签署，或者推说她不明白自己签署的内容，美国政府律师有权提出控诉、定罪。这些孟晚舟同意的事实，可能在听证会上作为证据提出。这份事实也会作为法官宣布她的罪行和定罪时使用。
简单地说，孟晚舟虽然没有在法庭上认罪，但在和解协议上却承认了犯罪事实，而这将有助于美国司法部未来起诉华为。按照美国司法部和联邦调查局官员所言，“这为证明华为违反美国法律提供了证据”。因此，从这个意义上说，孟签署的和解协议对华为和中共来说，并不是什么好消息，这也是为何为了自己的脸面，中共媒体偷换概念，不敢将和解书内容公诸于众，却用其“没有认罪”的说辞继续欺骗中国人的原因。
那么，孟晚舟和中共为何要同意签署这份协议呢？这是因为在事实面前，孟胜诉的可能性非常小，因此被引渡的概率很高。一旦被引渡到美国，中共无法保证孟晚舟是否会为了自身，与美司法部达成认罪协议，吐露更多秘密。是以，大概考虑到华为已是昨日黄花，制裁已无可逆转，中共批准了协议的签署。
如此看来，孟晚舟在中共眼中还真是一个很重要的人物，至少她应该知晓很多华为与中共军方的秘密。众所周知，华为和其创始人任正非具有官方、军方背景，且身负政治任务。根据越来越多披露的资料，不断壮大的华为等高科技公司一方面在国内帮助中共政府打造“金盾工程”、“天网工程”，监控国人，从而将中国大陆改造成为一个大监狱。另一方面通过向全球推广其技术，充当间谍工具。路透社曾有报导指，北京官员对他们开发和出口新一代信息技术（5G）的愿望毫不掩饰，而华为是实现中共全球科技野心的前沿，这也是为什么中共将5G行业列为“中国制造2025”计划中十个重点发展行业的首位。
美国众议院情报委员会2012年的一份报告则警告说，华为为中共军队的精英网络战机构提供特别网络服务，华为的设备可能被用来监视美国人或让美国的电信网路不稳定。也基于此，美国、澳大利亚、新西兰、英国等将华为排除在5G市场之外。日本政府也在拆解华为设备后，发现了硬件中存在不必要的零件后，将华为和中兴通讯的产品从政府内部的采购清单上排除。
作为华为的高管，作为任正非的重要帮手，孟晚舟应该知晓太多的秘密，而华为背后的那些军方非军方的“大老板们”并不希望孟晚舟吐露更多的秘密，包括中共与伊朗交易的更多秘密，以及华为对西方的监听等。这应该就是中共当局竭尽全力营救孟晚舟，哪怕采取流氓手段抓捕人质，甚至宁可签署和解协议书，也让将其弄回国的原因所在。
可以说，在中共真正掌控权力的人眼中，孟晚舟也不过是个高级大马仔，只有将这个掌握内情的大马仔真正掌控在自己手中，才能放心。这也意味着回国后的孟晚舟希冀的“自由”也不会拥有。至于那些在中共洗脑下，力挺孟晚舟的各位，还是洗洗睡了吧，为这样一个拥有七本护照、海外拥有豪华别墅、子女在国外读书，家产丰厚，经常与权贵打交道的人操心，犯得着吗？
如果属实，她老公孩子就一定不能一起回去
又夹杂私货。你倒是把所谓“华为通过Skycom向伊朗销售了包含美国芯片在内的设备，违反了美国对伊朗的制裁和《出口管制法》；”这段话从美国公布的文件中找出原文来。
In her presentation, Ms. Meng stated, among other things, that Huawei’s
relationship with Skycom was “normal business cooperation” and “normal
and controllable business cooperation,” and she described Skycom as a “
partner,” a “business partner of Huawei,” and a “third party Huawei
works with” in Iran. Those statements were untrue because, as Ms. Meng knew, Skycom was not a business partner of, or a third party working with,
Huawei; instead, Huawei controlled Skycom, and Skycom employees were really
Huawei employees. It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to
know that Huawei controlled Skycom. In addition, Ms. Meng stated that Huawei“was once a shareholder of Skycom” but had “sold all its shares in
Skycom.” Those statements were untrue, because, as Ms. Meng knew, Huawei
had “sold” its shares to an entity that Huawei controlled. Specifically,
Huawei transferred Skycom shares from a Huawei subsidiary (Hua Ying) to
another entity that was controlled by Huawei (Canicula). It would have been
material to Financial Institution 1 to know that Skycom was transferred fromone Huawei controlled entity to another. Finally, Ms. Meng stated that
Huawei “operates in Iran in strict compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and sanctions” and that “there has been no violation of exportcontrol regulations” by “Huawei or any third party Huawei works with.”
These statements were untrue because Huawei’s operation of Skycom, which
caused the Financial Institutions to provide prohibited services, including
banking services, for Huawei’s Iran-based business while Huawei concealed
Skycom’s link to Huawei, was in violation of the U.S.Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Iranian Transactions and
Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560. Moreover, during the Relevant
Time Period, Huawei caused Skycom to conduct approximately $100 million
worth of U.S.-dollar transactions through Financial Institution 1 that
cleared through the United States, at least some of which supported its workin Iran in violation of U.S. law, including $7.5 million for Iran-based
contractors from the U.K. staffing company to do work in Iran.
以下部分为微软翻译结果：
孟女士在演讲中表示，除其他事项外，华为与Skycom的关系是"正常的业务合作"和"正
常和可控的业务合作"，她形容Skycom是"合作伙伴"，"华为的商业伙伴"，以及"华为在伊朗合作的第三方"。这些说法是不真实的，因为孟女士知道，Skycom不是华为的业务
合作伙伴，也不是与华为合作的第三方：相反，华为控制了天通，而天通员工确实是华为员工。知道华为控制了Skycom，对金融机构1来说，这本来是实质性的。此外，孟女
士还表示，华为"曾经是Skycom的股东"，但"出售了其在Skycom的所有股份"。这些说法是不真实的，因为正如孟女士所知，华为已经将其股份"出售"给华为控制的一家实体。具体来说，华为将Skycom的股份从华为子公司（华英）转让给华为（卡努拉）控制的另一家实体。知道Skycom从华为控股的实体转移到另一家，对金融机构1来说，这本来是
实质性的。最后，孟女士表示，华为"严格按照相关法律、法规和制裁措施在伊朗开展
业务"，"华为或华为与任何第三方合作""没有违反出口管制规定"。这些说法是不真实
的，因为华为运营Skycom，导致金融机构为华为在伊朗的业务提供被禁止的服务，包括银行服务，而华为隐瞒了Skycom与华为的联系，违反了美国财政部外国资产管制办公室的《伊朗交易和制裁条例》，即C.F.R.第560部分。此外，在相关期间，华为还让
Skycom通过通过美国清算的金融机构1进行价值约1亿美元的交易，其中至少部分交易支持其在伊朗的工作违反了美国法律，其中包括750万美元用于伊朗承包商英国员工公司
在伊朗工作。
要不然为什么骂TM烂屁眼的傻逼屁精王八五
【 在 DreamTiger (钟爱你一生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 又夹杂私货。你倒是把所谓“华为通过Skycom向伊朗销售了包含美国芯片在内的设备，
: 违反了美国对伊朗的制裁和《出口管制法》；”这段话从美国公布的文件中找出原文来。
: In her presentation, Ms. Meng stated, among other things, that Huawei’s
: relationship with Skycom was “normal business cooperation” and “normal
: and controllable business cooperation,” and she described Skycom as a “
: partner,” a “business partner of Huawei,” and a “third party Huawei
: works with” in Iran. Those statements were untrue because, as Ms. Meng
knew
: , Skycom was not a business partner of, or a third party working with,
: Huawei; instead, Huawei controlled Skycom, and Skycom employees were
really
: Huawei employees. It would have been material to Financial Institution 1
to
: ...................