Why just 35k more votes? Why not a little bit more to gain majority in the Senate? Why not a little bit mroe to not lose the 9 (probably end up to be 14) seats in the House? Are you implying the EVIL dems are actually not that evil?
大律师 is someone you cannot trust. In each big case, both sides have 大律 师. Are they both trustworthy? They take the oath to fight for their clients, even if they are guilty. Are these the people you should trust? By the way, you just committed an appeal to authority fallacy and set a perfect example of it.
LOL 【 在 FortyNiner (Niner) 的大作中提到: 】 : 大律师 is someone you cannot trust. In each big case, both sides have 大律 : 师. Are they both trustworthy? They take the oath to fight for their : clients, even if they are guilty. Are these the people you should trust? : By the way, you just committed an appeal to authority fallacy and set a : perfect example of it.
No, you don't have to trust me, just the same as I don't trust you 这帮垃圾. Because there are at least two 大律师, one on each side, which 大律师 are you going to trust? Don't you see your dilemma? I will trust the one whom the court declares winner. At this time, YOUR 大律师 has not been declared winner by any court yet, at least on this case.
It is far far easier to make a global change on a software system with the same number. When you have hundreds of democratic candidates, it is costly and easy to find out if you make individualized global change.
【 在 FortyNiner (Niner) 的大作中提到: 】 : Why just 35k more votes? Why not a little bit more to gain majority in the : Senate? Why not a little bit mroe to not lose the 9 (probably end up to be : 14) seats in the House? Are you implying the EVIL dems are actually not : that evil?
And my question stays, with a little modification. Why not add 50k to each dem candidate to take over the Senate and the House?
【 在 dumbLuck (dum luck) 的大作中提到: 】 : It is far far easier to make a global change on a software system with the : same number. When you have hundreds of democratic candidates, it is costly : and easy to find out if you make individualized global change. : the : be
鲍威尔：每一个民主党候选人都被加了3.5万张选票
据“Gateway Pundit”11月21日报道，周六晚，川普竞选团队律师西德尼·鲍威尔参加了Newsmax晚间节目，讨论了2020年大选调查的最新进展。
这是川普律师的又一次爆炸性采访。
鲍威尔说，每个民主党候选人都被增加了35000张选票。
西德尼·鲍威尔在节目中说：我们有其他的证据表明，民主党给每个民主党候选人增加了35000张选票...在一个州里到处都是这样。我敢打赌，全美其它地方也都是这样。
vhttps://www.youtube.com/v/Lx7BFOOxFVo&feature=emb_logo
原文Sidney Powell: 35,000 Votes Were Added to Every Democrat Candidate – I'd Be Willing to Bet It Happened Everywhere
说是其中一个州，别的州可能也有类似情况。
难怪猪党民选官员那么烂，还一直当选。
轻轻地问一句，这位鲍大娘和楼主啥关系？
这个女律师以前是联邦检察官，现在是名律师，而且没有收川普团队的钱，不会乱说话的。
【 在 dnzdnz (dd) 的大作中提到: 】
: 轻轻地问一句，这位鲍大娘和楼主啥关系？
这个女的简直就是美版闫力猛，明显用力过猛
Why just 35k more votes? Why not a little bit more to gain majority in the Senate? Why not a little bit mroe to not lose the 9 (probably end up to be 14) seats in the House? Are you implying the EVIL dems are actually not
that evil?
这么精确啊
为啥是3.5 万票啊? 有啥秘密?
作弊的人有强迫症么
其它不知道，
但是我知道大律师的信用度，
比版上几个垃圾，
高到不知哪里去了。
人家powell 说了“I don’t say anything I can’t prove”
这里的左棍们除了成天追着人家屁股后面喊” no evidence, no evidence" 还能做什
么？人家大律师就是不叼你。
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 其它不知道，
: 但是我知道大律师的信用度，
: 比版上几个垃圾，
: 高到不知哪里去了。
IT 到目前为止prove nothing!
【 在 LOVE2017 (LOVE2017) 的大作中提到: 】
: 人家powell 说了“I don’t say anything I can’t prove”
: 这里的左棍们除了成天追着人家屁股后面喊” no evidence, no evidence" 还能做什
: 么？人家大律师就是不叼你。
人家是名满天下的大律师，
凭你这垃圾的一张大嘴，
就能诋毁的了？
【 在 Snowmanfight (雪渃) 的大作中提到: 】
: IT 到目前为止prove nothing!
正义的使者！邪不胜正！
正义的使者！邪不胜正！
大律师 is someone you cannot trust. In each big case, both sides have 大律
师. Are they both trustworthy? They take the oath to fight for their
clients, even if they are guilty. Are these the people you should trust?
By the way, you just committed an appeal to authority fallacy and set a
perfect example of it.
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 人家是名满天下的大律师，
: 凭你这垃圾的一张大嘴，
: 就能诋毁的了？
嗯，
大律师不能信，
你们这帮垃圾更可信。
LOL
【 在 FortyNiner (Niner) 的大作中提到: 】
: 大律师 is someone you cannot trust. In each big case, both sides have 大律
: 师. Are they both trustworthy? They take the oath to fight for their
: clients, even if they are guilty. Are these the people you should trust?
: By the way, you just committed an appeal to authority fallacy and set a
: perfect example of it.
这帮垃圾舔JB舔到精虫上脑， 不用多废话。
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 嗯，
: 大律师不能信，
: 你们这帮垃圾更可信。
: LOL
No, you don't have to trust me, just the same as I don't trust you 这帮垃圾. Because there are at least two 大律师, one on each side, which 大律师 are you going to trust? Don't you see your dilemma? I will trust the one whom the court declares winner. At this time, YOUR 大律师 has not been declared winner by any court yet, at least on this case.
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 嗯，
: 大律师不能信，
: 你们这帮垃圾更可信。
: LOL
You 这帮垃圾舔 Trump's JB舔到精虫上脑. Is that what you were trying to say?
【 在 Lexian (蒙古大夫) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这帮垃圾舔JB舔到精虫上脑， 不用多废话。
Then why don't you believe the 大律师 on the other side? I thought you said you trust 大律师.
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 嗯，
: 大律师不能信，
: 你们这帮垃圾更可信。
: LOL
属实。
【 在 Lexian (蒙古大夫) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这帮垃圾舔JB舔到精虫上脑， 不用多废话。
So you are also one of the 垃圾舔 Trump's JB舔到精虫上脑?
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 属实。
So you are also one of the 垃圾舔 Trump's JB舔到精虫上脑? How does it feel? Can you share with us?
【 在 xiaoxiaole02 (xiaole) 的大作中提到: 】
: 属实。
So you and xiaoxiaole02 together 舔 Trump's JB舔到精虫上脑? How excited! It must be erotic too.
【 在 Lexian (蒙古大夫) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这帮垃圾舔JB舔到精虫上脑， 不用多废话。
It is far far easier to make a global change on a software system with the
same number. When you have hundreds of democratic candidates, it is costly
and easy to find out if you make individualized global change.
【 在 FortyNiner (Niner) 的大作中提到: 】
: Why just 35k more votes? Why not a little bit more to gain majority in
the
: Senate? Why not a little bit mroe to not lose the 9 (probably end up to
be
: 14) seats in the House? Are you implying the EVIL dems are actually not
: that evil?
I know some Trumpanzee comrade might jump out and accuse me of using 脏话。
Please note that I just quoted someone's 脏话 used on me.
And my question stays, with a little modification. Why not add 50k to each dem candidate to take over the Senate and the House?
【 在 dumbLuck (dum luck) 的大作中提到: 】
: It is far far easier to make a global change on a software system with the
: same number. When you have hundreds of democratic candidates, it is costly
: and easy to find out if you make individualized global change.
: the
: be
鲍大娘光顾在电视上风光， 没想到玩大了， 被老床一脚踢开
【 在 chace (Time is money, friend!) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个女的简直就是美版闫力猛，明显用力过猛
川普团队今天都发声明撇清跟鲍大妈的关系了，这里的川粪还拿她那些搞笑的证据当好东西。大妈就是发愣功的传人啊
【 在 xiaoliu8964 (经济专家) 的大作中提到: 】
: 鲍威尔：每一个民主党候选人都被加了3.5万张选票
: 据“Gateway Pundit”11月21日报道，周六晚，川普竞选团队律师西德尼·鲍威尔参加
: 了Newsmax晚间节目，讨论了2020年大选调查的最新进展。
: 这是川普律师的又一次爆炸性采访。
: 鲍威尔说，每个民主党候选人都被增加了35000张选票。
: 西德尼·鲍威尔在节目中说：我们有其他的证据表明，民主党给每个民主党候选人增加
: 了35000张选票...在一个州里到处都是这样。我敢打赌，全美其它地方也都是这样。: vhttps://www.youtube.com/v/Lx7BFOOxFVo&feature=emb_logo
: 原文Sidney Powell: 35,000 Votes Were Added to Every Democrat Candidate – I'
: d Be Willing to Bet It Happened Everywhere
打脸，打脸，打脸，打脸，。。。继续打脸！
【 在 renzaimg (michael) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这个女律师以前是联邦检察官，现在是名律师，而且没有收川普团队的钱，不会乱说话
: 的。
打脸，打脸，，，，，， 继续打脸！
【 在 LOVE2017 (LOVE2017) 的大作中提到: 】
: 人家powell 说了“I don’t say anything I can’t prove”
: 这里的左棍们除了成天追着人家屁股后面喊” no evidence, no evidence" 还能做什
: 么？人家大律师就是不叼你。
作弊有脸吗？
【 在 dnzdnz (dd) 的大作中提到: 】
: 打脸，打脸，，，，，， 继续打脸！