Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the context of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in the court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in mind that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means, you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined.
Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a few years back that no Supreme Court justice should be nominated in an election year? And I quote: "The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president". Do you agree with his point of view?
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】 : 听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题： : Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the context : of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in the : court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few : minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in mind : that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means, : you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined. : Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on : how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my : learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a : ...................
Senator, I was nominated for the supreme count justice, and a justice should have an independent view of an issue instead of worrying whether or not that aligns with an opinion from the congress. For this issue, I agree more with Justice Ginsburg that a president is elected for fours years, not three years, thus this nomination is not unconstitutional.
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】 : 听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题： : Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the context : of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in the : court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few : minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in mind : that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means, : you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined. : Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on : how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my : learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a : ...................
Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president is elected?
【 在 orz2010 (orzorz) 的大作中提到: 】 : Senator, I was nominated for the supreme count justice, and a justice should : have an independent view of an issue instead of worrying whether or not : that aligns with an opinion from the congress. For this issue, I agree more : with Justice Ginsburg that a president is elected for fours years, not three : years, thus this nomination is not unconstitutional.
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】 : 哦，原来已经有人问了。她这说法就是“又不违法”那一套，好像法律是世上唯一的准 : 则。如果我是那个提问的议员，我会追问： : Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long : recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that : it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a voice : in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president : is elected? : should : more : three
senator, american people have the voice right now, and they always have the chance to have a voice, because they elected president every four years, and elected senators every six years, which would decide if i will join the supreme court. when they casted their votes, they understood the length of the terms. and we should respect the choice that american people have made.
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】 : 哦，原来已经有人问了。她这说法就是“又不违法”那一套，好像法律是世上唯一的准 : 则。如果我是那个提问的议员，我会追问： : Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long : recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that : it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a voice : in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president : is elected? : should : more : three
听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题：
Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the context of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in the court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few
minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in mind that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means,
you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined.
Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on
how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my
learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a
few years back that no Supreme Court justice should be nominated in an
election year? And I quote: "The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy
should not be filled until we have a new president". Do you agree with his
point of view?
不管她怎么回答，或不回答，都会很有意思。
如果我是她，我会这么回答：On the ground of conflict interest, I will refrain myself from answering your question at this time.
这种小儿科的问题， 亏你想的出来。
人家一个反问就行了， 你这个参议员2016 是啥立场的。 是要求确认奥巴马的大法官
吧。
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题：
: Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the
context
: of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in
the
: court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few
: minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in
mind
: that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means,
: you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined.
: Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on
: how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my
: learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a : ...................
哈哈哈，刚刚才有人教训我说我不该自以为高人一等。我正准备反思改进，可又来了这个讥我小儿科的。。。
一、她是被质询人，不宜/不应反问。那年 Kavanaugh did just that and was
construed as arrogant and partisan.
二、议员如何不是这质询的重点，她要敢如此反问只会凸显她连重点都抓不到。
三、主楼的问题是个 open question，你的所谓反问是个已经预设立场的假问题，她怎么可以就假设议员一定是确认奥巴马的大法官？历史上不是没有例外。
四、就算人家会确认奥巴马提名的大法官，与 Barret 是否同意 McConnell 的立场，
逻辑上有什么关联性？可比性？这个反问只是凸显她的推理思考逻辑跟糟糕，根本不配当判案法官。
【 在 baideng (白灯) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这种小儿科的问题， 亏你想的出来。
: 人家一个反问就行了， 你这个参议员2016 是啥立场的。 是要求确认奥巴马的大法官
: 吧。
Senator, I was nominated for the supreme count justice, and a justice should have an independent view of an issue instead of worrying whether or not
that aligns with an opinion from the congress. For this issue, I agree more with Justice Ginsburg that a president is elected for fours years, not three years, thus this nomination is not unconstitutional.
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题：
: Your Honor, I understand the question I'm going to ask is out of the
context
: of this confirmation hearing and is not related to your performance in
the
: court of law, or even practice of law. But I'd still like to take a few
: minute to hear your thoughts on this particular question. And, keep in
mind
: that you are not under any obligation to answer, and so, by all means,
: you're free to decline to answer if you are so inclined.
: Do you, as a legal professional with profound knowledge and experiences on
: how laws affect Americans' lives, agree or disagree with the stand that my
: learned colleague, His Honorable Mr. Mitch McConell from Kentucky, took a : ...................
哦，原来已经有人问了。她这说法就是“又不违法”那一套，好像法律是世上唯一的准则。如果我是那个提问的议员，我会追问：
Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long
recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that
it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president
is elected?
【 在 orz2010 (orzorz) 的大作中提到: 】
: Senator, I was nominated for the supreme count justice, and a justice
should
: have an independent view of an issue instead of worrying whether or not
: that aligns with an opinion from the congress. For this issue, I agree
more
: with Justice Ginsburg that a president is elected for fours years, not
three
: years, thus this nomination is not unconstitutional.
这个事吧，美国人民每四年表达一次声音，现在提名谁，正是听的人民在2016年表达的声音。既然不是每次提名都听一次人民的声音，那自然就是按时间分隔了。
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 哦，原来已经有人问了。她这说法就是“又不违法”那一套，好像法律是世上唯一的准
: 则。如果我是那个提问的议员，我会追问：
: Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long
: recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that
: it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a
voice
: in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president
: is elected?
: should
: more
: three
不related还问啥，脑子坏了
【在 ai1901(笑看众生)的大作中提到：】
：听了几个议员的质询，没听到我想问的问题：
：
谢谢番薯看得起我。我瞎编的。。。
下面接着编：
senator, american people have the voice right now, and they always have the chance to have a voice, because they elected president every four years,
and elected senators every six years, which would decide if i will join the supreme court. when they casted their votes, they understood the length of
the terms. and we should respect the choice that american people have made.
【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 哦，原来已经有人问了。她这说法就是“又不违法”那一套，好像法律是世上唯一的准
: 则。如果我是那个提问的议员，我会追问：
: Not unconstitutional, we know that; it's not illegal, we have long
: recognized that. But do you, as an individual American citizen, think that
: it would be better if American people were given the chance to have a
voice
: in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice after the new president
: is elected?
: should
: more
: three