If a foreign state other than an oversubscribed country has little Family preference demand but considerable Employment preference demand, the otherwise unused Family numbers fall across to Employment (and vice versa) for purposes of that foreign state’s annual numerical limit. For example, in FY-2009 South Korea used a grand total of 15,899 Family and Employment preference numbers, of which 1,688 were Family numbers and 14,211 were Employment numbers. This grand total was well within the FY-2009 per-countrynumerical limit of 25,620 Family and Employment numbers combined, so South Korea was not oversubscribed. The unused Family numbers were distributed within the Employment categories, allowing South Korea to be considerably over the 9,800 Employment limit which would have been in effect had it been an oversubscribed country. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/ 2010/visa-bulletin-for-april-2010.html
【 在 atiger (昼伏夜出的老虎) 的大作中提到: 】 : 9年前奥本这么解释的为什么韩国EB23超发很多： : If a foreign state other than an oversubscribed country has little Family : preference demand but considerable Employment preference demand, the : otherwise unused Family numbers fall across to Employment (and vice versa): for purposes of that foreign state’s annual numerical limit. For example,: in FY-2009 South Korea used a grand total of 15,899 Family and Employment : preference numbers, of which 1,688 were Family numbers and 14,211 were : Employment numbers. This grand total was well within the FY-2009 per- country : numerical limit of 25,620 Family and Employment numbers combined, so South: Korea was not oversubscribed. The unused Family numbers were distributed : ...................
查了下FB的玩法。比EB复杂啊，尤其是F2： 1）“114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000,”这句是啥意思？ 2）F2A中的绝大多数原来是不算国别的啊。
FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES
First: (F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.
Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:
A. (F2A) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;
B. (F2B) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.
Third: (F3) Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.
Fourth: (F4) Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences. 【 在 josephwangj (joseph) 的大作中提到: 】 : EB1A/B/C分开排期别叫合理，不知道如何才能推动？
总结了下2000年至2018年中国，印度和韩国的职业移民发卡数据，尼玛真把我惊到了，奥本这是娶了个韩国老婆么，怎么对韩国人那么好。图表里的EB3只是skilled worker
数据，韩国每年还能额外拿到好几百甚至上千的EB3 unskilled worker名额。不要告诉我这是韩国人从自己国家的FB里分到的SO，我查了下FB的SO，已经全部在FB内部不同国家之间消耗掉了。相比韩国，奥本对中国的EB23真是太吝啬了，好几年都发不满咱们国家7%的职业移民配额。希望中国EB1开始排期以后，不会遭遇到EB23 China这样的局面。
数据来源：https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-statistics.
html
同震惊
韩国EB4也有很多
不过这个EB2的真是惊到了，请问数据来源
【 在 absFFT () 的大作中提到: 】
: 总结了下2000年至2018年中国，印度和韩国的职业移民发卡数据，尼玛真把我惊到了，
: 奥本这是娶了个韩国老婆么，怎么对韩国人那么好。图表里的EB3只是skilled
worker
: 数据，韩国每年还能额外拿到好几百甚至上千的EB3 unskilled worker名额。不要告诉
: 我这是韩国人从自己国家的FB里分到的SO，我查了下FB的SO，已经全部在FB内部不同国
: 家之间消耗掉了。相比韩国，奥本对中国的EB23真是太吝啬了，好几年都发不满咱们国
: 家7%的职业移民配额。希望中国EB1开始排期以后，不会遭遇到EB23 China这样的局
面。
9年前奥本这么解释的为什么韩国EB23超发很多：
If a foreign state other than an oversubscribed country has little Family
preference demand but considerable Employment preference demand, the
otherwise unused Family numbers fall across to Employment (and vice versa)
for purposes of that foreign state’s annual numerical limit. For example,
in FY-2009 South Korea used a grand total of 15,899 Family and Employment
preference numbers, of which 1,688 were Family numbers and 14,211 were
Employment numbers. This grand total was well within the FY-2009 per-countrynumerical limit of 25,620 Family and Employment numbers combined, so South
Korea was not oversubscribed. The unused Family numbers were distributed
within the Employment categories, allowing South Korea to be considerably
over the 9,800 Employment limit which would have been in effect had it been
an oversubscribed country.
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/
2010/visa-bulletin-for-april-2010.html
看了一下，近年韩国的FB还是很少，所以应该还是这样调剂的结果。在2018FY，只有四个国家超过了25620 (FB+EB的7%的线)，韩国最终只拿到11844。
【 在 absFFT () 的大作中提到: 】
: 总结了下2000年至2018年中国，印度和韩国的职业移民发卡数据，尼玛真把我惊到了，
: 奥本这是娶了个韩国老婆么，怎么对韩国人那么好。图表里的EB3只是skilled
worker
: 数据，韩国每年还能额外拿到好几百甚至上千的EB3 unskilled worker名额。不要告诉
: 我这是韩国人从自己国家的FB里分到的SO，我查了下FB的SO，已经全部在FB内部不同国
: 家之间消耗掉了。相比韩国，奥本对中国的EB23真是太吝啬了，好几年都发不满咱们国
: 家7%的职业移民配额。希望中国EB1开始排期以后，不会遭遇到EB23 China这样的局
面。
html
【 在 DanielChai (Daniel) 的大作中提到: 】
: 同震惊
: 韩国EB4也有很多
: 不过这个EB2的真是惊到了，请问数据来源
: worker
: 面。
好吧，那我知道什么意思了。就是在FB内部，韩国没用完的名额补贴给了墨西哥这类FB消耗大户；然后在EB内部，墨西哥用不完的名额补贴给了韩国。这样来看的话7%的国家限额是要综合FB+EB考虑的，所以之前中国EB23的拿卡名额少了是因为EB1和EB5拿卡多
了。现在中国的F2A current，意味着未来FB可能会匀出来一些名额给EB。
【 在 atiger (昼伏夜出的老虎) 的大作中提到: 】
: 9年前奥本这么解释的为什么韩国EB23超发很多：
: If a foreign state other than an oversubscribed country has little Family
: preference demand but considerable Employment preference demand, the
: otherwise unused Family numbers fall across to Employment (and vice versa): for purposes of that foreign state’s annual numerical limit. For example,: in FY-2009 South Korea used a grand total of 15,899 Family and Employment
: preference numbers, of which 1,688 were Family numbers and 14,211 were
: Employment numbers. This grand total was well within the FY-2009 per-
country
: numerical limit of 25,620 Family and Employment numbers combined, so South: Korea was not oversubscribed. The unused Family numbers were distributed
: ...................
很奇怪，F2A/B居然是分开排期的，而EB1A/B/C不是。理论上F2A的多余名额是不是应该优先给F2B
【 在 absFFT () 的大作中提到: 】
: 好吧，那我知道什么意思了。就是在FB内部，韩国没用完的名额补贴给了墨西哥这类FB
: 消耗大户；然后在EB内部，墨西哥用不完的名额补贴给了韩国。这样来看的话7%的国家
: 限额是要综合FB+EB考虑的，所以之前中国EB23的拿卡名额少了是因为EB1和EB5拿卡多
: 了。现在中国的F2A current，意味着未来FB可能会匀出来一些名额给EB。
: country
EB1A/B/C分开排期别叫合理，不知道如何才能推动？
【 在 roygreat (Light be with you.) 的大作中提到: 】
: 很奇怪，F2A/B居然是分开排期的，而EB1A/B/C不是。理论上F2A的多余名额是不是应该
: 优先给F2B
: FB
查了下FB的玩法。比EB复杂啊，尤其是F2：
1）“114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family
preference level exceeds 226,000,”这句是啥意思？
2）F2A中的绝大多数原来是不算国别的啊。
FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES
First: (F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.
Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:
A. (F2A) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall
second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country
limit;
B. (F2B) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of
Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.
Third: (F3) Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any
numbers not required by first and second preferences.
Fourth: (F4) Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.
【 在 josephwangj (joseph) 的大作中提到: 】
: EB1A/B/C分开排期别叫合理，不知道如何才能推动？