last night on MSNBC, Brian Williams read a tweet: “Bloomberg spent $500 million on ads. The U.S. population is 327 million. He could have given each American $1 million,” and then somebody from the New York Times editorial board, Mara Gay, chimed in, “It’s an incredible way of putting it. It’s true. It’s disturbing.”
Uhhh, no. He spent $500 million on ads. Run the numbers here, Wendy. Let’s run the numbers together. Math is not hard. You’re a smart woman. It’s $ 500 million. The Population is 300 million, 327 million Americans. You got 327 million Americans and $500 million. If you’re gonna divvy that up equally, how much is every American gonna get? The answer’s $1.53, and yet here they are at MSNBC suggesting that since Bloomberg spent $500 million and the population of America’s 327 million, that every American could have been given $1.5 million by Bloomberg.
【 在 cellcycle (vacoule) 的大作中提到: 】 : last night on MSNBC, Brian Williams read a tweet: “Bloomberg spent $500 : million on ads. The U.S. population is 327 million. He could have given each : American $1 million,” and then somebody from the New York Times editorial : board, Mara Gay, chimed in, “It’s an incredible way of putting it. It’s : true. It’s disturbing.” : Uhhh, no. He spent $500 million on ads. Run the numbers here, Wendy. Let’s : run the numbers together. Math is not hard. You’re a smart woman. It’s $: 500 million. The Population is 300 million, 327 million Americans. You got : 327 million Americans and $500 million. If you’re gonna divvy that up : equally, how much is every American gonna get? The answer’s $1.53, and yet : ...................
last night on MSNBC, Brian Williams read a tweet: “Bloomberg spent $500
million on ads. The U.S. population is 327 million. He could have given each American $1 million,” and then somebody from the New York Times editorial board, Mara Gay, chimed in, “It’s an incredible way of putting it. It’s
true. It’s disturbing.”
Uhhh, no. He spent $500 million on ads. Run the numbers here, Wendy. Let’s run the numbers together. Math is not hard. You’re a smart woman. It’s $
500 million. The Population is 300 million, 327 million Americans. You got
327 million Americans and $500 million. If you’re gonna divvy that up
equally, how much is every American gonna get? The answer’s $1.53, and yet here they are at MSNBC suggesting that since Bloomberg spent $500 million
and the population of America’s 327 million, that every American could have been given $1.5 million by Bloomberg.
math is racism.
他的数学可以力拼番薯的英文
美国人缺少 number sense
【 在 cellcycle (vacoule) 的大作中提到: 】
: last night on MSNBC, Brian Williams read a tweet: “Bloomberg spent $500
: million on ads. The U.S. population is 327 million. He could have given
each
: American $1 million,” and then somebody from the New York Times
editorial
: board, Mara Gay, chimed in, “It’s an incredible way of putting it. It’s
: true. It’s disturbing.”
: Uhhh, no. He spent $500 million on ads. Run the numbers here, Wendy. Let’s
: run the numbers together. Math is not hard. You’re a smart woman. It’s $: 500 million. The Population is 300 million, 327 million Americans. You got
: 327 million Americans and $500 million. If you’re gonna divvy that up
: equally, how much is every American gonna get? The answer’s $1.53, and
yet
: ...................
多感慨一句。
美国人说中国人数学好，不是。是中国人里数学烂的不可能被提拔到这个地位。华人圈里摆台面上的都能做个基本除法。
要给 番薯 希望。。。
【 在 fishingarden (Edward Blum门下老王) 的大作中提到: 】
: 多感慨一句。
: 美国人说中国人数学好，不是。是中国人里数学烂的不可能被提拔到这个地位。华人圈
: 里摆台面上的都能做个基本除法。
霉国几十年的愚民教育，现在的99.9%傻逼霉国猪真他妈的听话。
你搞错了。
美国人总说中国人数学好。（然后有时候太自大了又不乐意乘认）
【 在 fishingarden (Edward Blum门下老王) 的大作中提到: 】
: 标 题: Re: MSNBC 数学谁教的？这样的天天在媒体还忽悠别人？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 6 17:05:49 2020, 美东)
:
: 多感慨一句。
:
: 美国人说中国人数学好，不是。是中国人里数学烂的不可能被提拔到这个地位。华人圈
: 里摆台面上的都能做个基本除法。
: --
承认
承认
【 在 fishingarden (Edward Blum门下老王) 的大作中提到: 】
: 标 题: Re: MSNBC 数学谁教的？这样的天天在媒体还忽悠别人？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 6 17:05:49 2020, 美东)
:
: 多感慨一句。
:
: 美国人说中国人数学好，不是。是中国人里数学烂的不可能被提拔到这个地位。华人圈
: 里摆台面上的都能做个基本除法。
: --
Math is not leftists' favorite subject.