In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually want to get the most optimal solution).
The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after the interview)
No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask either).
I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the candidate could not come up with it.
I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution. Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”.
I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a fast coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the : recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”. : : I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a fast : coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This : candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the : recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”. : : I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a fast : coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This : candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
確實這麼被題的屬於沒什麼能力的人。但是當面試者都把lc掛在嘴邊的時候，還立牌坊就是純婊子了。 【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 netghost (Up to Isomorphism) 的大作中提到: 】 : 確實這麼被題的屬於沒什麼能力的人。但是當面試者都把lc掛在嘴邊的時候，還立牌坊 : 就是純婊子了。 : 【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you : actually : :want to get the most optimal solution). : : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution : after : :the interview) : : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : : either). : : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and : the : : candidate could not come up with it. : : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the : solution : : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the : recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”. : : I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a fast : coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This : candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
What is critical thinking? I only heard creative thinking.
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】 : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually : want to get the most optimal solution). : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after : the interview) : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : either). : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the : candidate could not come up with it. : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution : ...................
In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you actually want to get the most optimal solution).
The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution after the interview)
No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
either).
I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and the candidate could not come up with it.
I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the solution. Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the
recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”.
I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a fast coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This
candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
这个估计是狗家
我不会这么感情用事 做对了我会给过。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
我就喜欢这种给人下绊子的老中
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
:
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
:
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
:
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
:
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the
: recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”.
:
: I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a
fast
: coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This
: candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
麻痹。哪里说老钟了。。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
:
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
:
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
:
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
:
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the
: recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”.
:
: I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a
fast
: coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This
: candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
是不是对critical thinking有些误解
確實這麼被題的屬於沒什麼能力的人。但是當面試者都把lc掛在嘴邊的時候，還立牌坊就是純婊子了。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
Critical Thinking? Executive me
LOL
问题是没见过的话，一般人都做不出。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
没说是老中，就是题以最优做法做出来了，人家要naive的做法没做出来，结果就
Strong No Hire了。那油何必要问leetcode上面的题呢。。
yes！
破坏自己制定的游戏规则还他妈的义正言辞
【 在 netghost (Up to Isomorphism) 的大作中提到: 】
: 確實這麼被題的屬於沒什麼能力的人。但是當面試者都把lc掛在嘴邊的時候，還立牌坊
: 就是純婊子了。
: 【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: : In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
: actually
: :want to get the most optimal solution).
: : The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time.
The
: : code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
: after
: :the interview)
: : No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask : : either).
: : I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and : the
: : candidate could not come up with it.
: : I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
: solution
: : ...................
这种情况我一般就是给过了。我自己就是刷题起家，要是题没刷到，我一般都做不出来。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
就我本人经历来看，许多面试的自己出的题都没我明白，还瞎几把提建议，还有烙印自己动手在我code上瞎几把改，改了又不work，然后问我是不是看出来他想干嘛，我帮他把他加的垃圾code改work了，最后面试也没过
装啥几把critical thinking 逼 好像丫自己多critical似的
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
:
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
:
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
:
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
:
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: . Only repeated the recurrence (dP). When asked how you came up with the
: recurrence I got a generic canned answer “oh we build on smaller problems”.
:
: I gave the candidate a strong no hire. The position does not require a
fast
: coder, but does require someone with critical thinking skills. This
: candidate did not demonstrate that at all.
太把 coding interview 当回事了
招个马公用的着这么认真吗 弄的跟招个教授一样
What is critical thinking? I only heard creative thinking.
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
【 在 lionelliu (lioneliu) 的大作中提到: 】
: 没说是老中，就是题以最优做法做出来了，人家要naive的做法没做出来，结果就
: Strong No Hire了。那油何必要问leetcode上面的题呢。。
对啊，这管面试的人又当又立就是因为有power呗。即使那个人各种方法都做出来他还
能找茬儿
熟食，这个面试官显然就是一个装逼的，如果人家一开始没写出最优解，估计也是被他否掉，结果人家上来就最优了，让他嫉妒了吧
【 在 bigball (大球) 的大作中提到: 】
: 装啥几把critical thinking 逼 好像丫自己多critical似的
: actually
: after
: the
: solution
: ”.
: fast
critical thinking的另一个叫法就是装B.
【 在 Mi24 (Hind) 的大作中提到: 】
: What is critical thinking? I only heard creative thinking.
: actually
: after
: the
: solution
现在大家知道面试官写review/comments的区别多大了吧。同一个candidate,同一场面
试，interviewer的评价可以完全不同。
【 在 CokeCoke (nicedrink) 的大作中提到: 】
: 熟食，这个面试官显然就是一个装逼的，如果人家一开始没写出最优解，估计也是被他
: 否掉，结果人家上来就最优了，让他嫉妒了吧
我找工作从来没刷过超过一百个LC，比人家狠狠刷题的工资涨的慢点，毕竟做不到拿十个offer然后讲最高价。不过也慢慢做到今天。最近有个小兄弟让我给看简历，顺便提
了一下自己刷题量，很汗颜。我十年刷的leetcode都没人家三个月刷的多。然后人家只是期待一个比我低得多的职位。感觉这行越来越不好混了。
【 在 netghost (Up to Isomorphism) 的大作中提到: 】
: 確實這麼被題的屬於沒什麼能力的人。但是當面試者都把lc掛在嘴邊的時候，還立牌坊
: 就是純婊子了。
: actually
: after
: the
: solution
你入职早那时候题目简单 现在水涨船高 动辄二维数组dfs 工作中用不到的套路
【 在 iamwq (动心忍性) 的大作中提到: 】
: 我找工作从来没刷过超过一百个LC，比人家狠狠刷题的工资涨的慢点，毕竟做不到拿十
: 个offer然后讲最高价。不过也慢慢做到今天。最近有个小兄弟让我给看简历，顺便提
: 了一下自己刷题量，很汗颜。我十年刷的leetcode都没人家三个月刷的多。然后人家只
: 是期待一个比我低得多的职位。感觉这行越来越不好混了。
Don't be a jerk!
You can always find faults with people.
Let him pass if he gets it correct.
critical我还以为是CRT呢。
我一般是手松让过，除了态度不好的，坚决不要。
牛逼哄哄的立刻干掉。
面试这种东西，一样的题，只要问的角度不同，给不给提示，难度立刻不一样。
硬生生把客观的coding round变成了主观轮。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
十年前狗家bar可高了，不一定比现在的题简单。
【 在 nostring (尼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你入职早那时候题目简单 现在水涨船高 动辄二维数组dfs 工作中用不到的套路
十年前狗家逼格还高呢，股票涨的也厉害，现在呢？
【 在 han6 (周瑜) 的大作中提到: 】
: 十年前狗家bar可高了，不一定比现在的题简单。
属实。面试扯几把蛋的随机成分太大。
让大厂员工都滚蛋重新刷题进去。
八成都过不了。
【 在 ratzinger (周星星) 的大作中提到: 】
: 就我本人经历来看，许多面试的自己出的题都没我明白，还瞎几把提建议，还有烙印自
: 己动手在我code上瞎几把改，改了又不work，然后问我是不是看出来他想干嘛，我帮他
: 把他加的垃圾code改work了，最后面试也没过
你理解错了
他说的是那个人就没理解为什么这么code
只是把答案背下来了
要naive做法只是为了从另一方面看他的思考
结果都fail了
no hire是有理由的
【 在 lionelliu (lioneliu) 的大作中提到: 】
: 没说是老中，就是题以最优做法做出来了，人家要naive的做法没做出来，结果就
: Strong No Hire了。那油何必要问leetcode上面的题呢。。
以前是只会基础的解法，不知道optimal solution的会fail。现在变成要先上optimal solution，但是如果被问基础解法也得能知道
【 在 aaaiii (酱爆) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你理解错了
: 他说的是那个人就没理解为什么这么code
: 只是把答案背下来了
: 要naive做法只是为了从另一方面看他的思考
: 结果都fail了
: no hire是有理由的
那个面试的只是把最优解背下来了
实际上哪个解法都不会
【 在 helpme (名虚胖字满肥) 的大作中提到: 】
: 以前是只会基础的解法，不知道optimal solution的会fail。现在变成要先上
optimal
: solution，但是如果被问基础解法也得能知道
如果是高频题确实应该彻底搞懂，否则LC上一千多题哪，能背出optimal solution就不错了
【 在 aaaiii (酱爆) 的大作中提到: 】
: 那个面试的只是把最优解背下来了
: 实际上哪个解法都不会
: optimal
能背最优解，多半还是得先理解最优解的，至少先理解了再背要容易很多。背也是背逻辑，不可能一行行背代码。Naive方法出不来很正常。很多时候最优解很难想到，但是
一旦知道了就恍然大悟很好记代码也很好写，反倒是Naive方法常常需要排列枚举啥的
，原理简单但代码不好写。
这是不是公司招人的新趋势？明文传达到面试官啦？
【 在 helpme (名虚胖字满肥) 的大作中提到: 】
: 以前是只会基础的解法，不知道optimal solution的会fail。现在变成要先上
optimal
: solution，但是如果被问基础解法也得能知道
我瞎猜的，面试这个东西主要看运气，碰上几个鸟人是很正常的
【 在 nostring (尼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 这是不是公司招人的新趋势？明文传达到面试官啦？
: optimal
对，平常心吧。我现在的打算是再拼五年，然后转入养老公司躺平
【 在 helpme (名虚胖字满肥) 的大作中提到: 】
: 我瞎猜的，面试这个东西主要看运气，碰上几个鸟人是很正常的
你多大了？
【 在 nostring (尼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 对，平常心吧。我现在的打算是再拼五年，然后转入养老公司躺平
熟食
盹盹盹
叔很怀疑楼上纯属瞎几把扯淡
完全不理解算法， 能把code背对， 这tm才是一般人做不到的吧
【 在 bobolan88 (波波熊) 的大作中提到: 】
: 标 题: Re: 老中刷题露馅了
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Dec 29 01:56:33 2021, 美东)
:
: 能背最优解，多半还是得先理解最优解的，至少先理解了再背要容易很多。背也是背逻
: 辑，不可能一行行背代码。Naive方法出不来很正常。很多时候最优解很难想到，但是
: 一旦知道了就恍然大悟很好记代码也很好写，反倒是Naive方法常常需要排列枚举啥的
: ，原理简单但代码不好写。
: --
刷题的90%是傻逼，10%是吃饱了没事干。
【 在 xmail (推荐TopCashback，参见博客) 的大作中提到: 】
: In a recent interview I asked for LC medium (slightly harder if you
actually
: want to get the most optimal solution).
: The candidate proceeded to give the most optimal solution in no time. The
: code was perfect. ( it fact it passed all LC test cases upon execution
after
: the interview)
: No acknowledgement of having seen the problem before (and I didn’t ask
: either).
: I asked a follow up to provide a straightforward recursive solution and
the
: candidate could not come up with it.
: I asked the candidates thought process on how he/she arrived at the
solution
: ...................
那得是机器人才能不理解还能把Code背对。写程序比写数学题证明还得严谨，错一点都不行。就算Interviewer不那么严格要求，但是人写程序犯的正常错误，跟死记硬背出
一点差错犯的错误类型完全不同，前者没啥大不了的，后者在人看来非常傻逼，因为逻辑根本不通。没懂就抄作业很容易被老师看出来，一个道理。
【 在 rihai (海桑虎桑柱桑等倭杂之克星) 的大作中提到: 】
: 熟食
: 盹盹盹
: 叔很怀疑楼上纯属瞎几把扯淡
: 完全不理解算法， 能把code背对， 这tm才是一般人做不到的吧
说句不好听的
要是没见过原题和类似的题，而且提前写过run过
十个人有八个在那么短的时间根本写不出来bug free的code，哪怕是那种笨的solution都够呛
包括那些面试官装逼犯。
对
Blind 上有人说狗面 全部没写出来 但是都有思路 竟然也过了。 我觉得这才是正道。四道题如果类型不同 全部新题 当场能有可行的思路pseudo code 就很牛逼了
【 在 paojiao (paojiao) 的大作中提到: 】
: 说句不好听的
: 要是没见过原题和类似的题，而且提前写过run过
: 十个人有八个在那么短的时间根本写不出来bug free的code，哪怕是那种笨的
solution
: 都够呛
: 包括那些面试官装逼犯。
那样能过的可能不是华男。很可能是白男或者稍有姿色的亚女。相同表现，面试你的人可以写的完全不一样。这个我见多了。
【 在 nostring (尼) 的大作中提到: 】
: 对
: Blind 上有人说狗面 全部没写出来 但是都有思路 竟然也过了。 我觉得这才是正道。
: 四道题如果类型不同 全部新题 当场能有可行的思路pseudo code 就很牛逼了
: solution