【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】 发信人: sbtelf (#@%#$%@$), 信区: Military 标 题: Re: 戴口罩还是洗手？--从飞沫背后的物理说起 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Mar 16 16:20:28 2020, 美东)
【 在 sbtelf (#@%#$%@$) 的大作中提到: 】 : 湿度对飞沫挥发降落曲线的影响那个图，原图作者把50%和70%这两个图标弄反了。 : 文章中有如下描述 : “We find the critical sizes to be about 125, 100, 85, and 60 μm when : the relative humidities of the indoor air environment are 0%, 50%, 70%, and : 90%, respectively, which are much smaller values than those obtained by : Wells (1934), i.e., 172, 145, 128, and 97 μm at the respective : relative humidity levels. ”
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: sbtelf (#@%#$%@$), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 戴口罩还是洗手？--从飞沫背后的物理说起
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Mar 16 16:20:28 2020, 美东)
【 在 sbtelf (#@%#$%@$) 的大作中提到: 】
: 湿度对飞沫挥发降落曲线的影响那个图，原图作者把50%和70%这两个图标弄反了。
: 文章中有如下描述
: “We find the critical sizes to be about 125, 100, 85, and 60 μm
when
: the relative humidities of the indoor air environment are 0%, 50%, 70%,
and
: 90%, respectively, which are much smaller values than those obtained by
: Wells (1934), i.e., 172, 145, 128, and 97 μm at the respective
: relative humidity levels. ”