As matter of fact, this is related to the so-called IP issue. Even though it is just a review, it is still your IP, which has its "owner" according to the institute or company policy. From this point, your previous has no right of it but a "current" address gives them the title to claim it.
My suggestion from my past experience as editor is that you should always use your current address in your situation unless you have works in this publication solely on your previous work (in that case, you use previous address and list your current address as current contact information). You can invite other coauthor with his/her current address. Since you are in company, you should inform your supervisor about this invitation and make a statement that it is not about your current work and you won't use the working hours. As my understanding, company like to have publications but not cross the line regarding to the data/project which needs to be maintained as confidential.
In addition, it may not be a bad idea to invite your supervisor as a coauthor. Some company even allow this to be listed as your achievement in the annual report. It benefits everyone. As long as you have the corresponding authorship at this moment.
者，学妹第二作者。
现在的问题是，请问我在投稿时，关于自己的affiliation，写现在的公司合适吗？因
为毕竟这篇文章跟我在公司做的科研内容没什么关系，而且我写这篇文章也没有跟公司的supervisor或者任何同事聊起过。但是如果用我以前的博士实验室作为我的
institution的话，因为我已经毕业了，所以不是我current的status。该如何做是最合适的呢？
非常感谢！
非常感谢！
【 在 springstory () 的大作中提到: 】
: 跟大家请教一个关于投稿的非science问题：我3年前博士毕业，现在在一个小的科技公
: 司工作，最近有个小杂志邀请我写篇跟我博士研究方向相关的review paper，我邀请了
: 以前读博时候的实验室里的一位学妹一起co-author，我打算自己做第一作者和通讯作
: 者，学妹第二作者。
: 现在的问题是，请问我在投稿时，关于自己的affiliation，写现在的公司合适吗？因
: 为毕竟这篇文章跟我在公司做的科研内容没什么关系，而且我写这篇文章也没有跟公司
: 的supervisor或者任何同事聊起过。但是如果用我以前的博士实验室作为我的
: institution的话，因为我已经毕业了，所以不是我current的status。该如何做是最合
: 适的呢？
: 非常感谢！
it is just a review, it is still your IP, which has its "owner" according to the institute or company policy. From this point, your previous has no
right of it but a "current" address gives them the title to claim it.
My suggestion from my past experience as editor is that you should always
use your current address in your situation unless you have works in this
publication solely on your previous work (in that case, you use previous
address and list your current address as current contact information). You can invite other coauthor with his/her current address. Since you are in
company, you should inform your supervisor about this invitation and make a statement that it is not about your current work and you won't use the
working hours. As my understanding, company like to have publications but
not cross the line regarding to the data/project which needs to be
maintained as confidential.
In addition, it may not be a bad idea to invite your supervisor as a
coauthor. Some company even allow this to be listed as your achievement in the annual report. It benefits everyone. As long as you have the
corresponding authorship at this moment.
Make friends!