Some of the best-known of these sites, such as medRxiv and bioRxiv, have systems for rapid evaluation intended to avoid publishing work that doesn’tpass an initial sniff test of scientific credibility. They also reject papers that only review the work of others or that make such major claims that they shouldn’t be publicized before peer review can be conducted, saidRichard Sever, co-founder of medRxiv and bioRxiv.
Some of the best-known of these sites, such as medRxiv and bioRxiv, have
systems for rapid evaluation intended to avoid publishing work that doesn’tpass an initial sniff test of scientific credibility. They also reject
papers that only review the work of others or that make such major claims
that they shouldn’t be publicized before peer review can be conducted, saidRichard Sever, co-founder of medRxiv and bioRxiv.