以下是一月八号的报道原文。上面的中文翻译不完全准确。 More melamine traces found in U.S. formula FDA officials call the levels safe for babies. A byproduct, cyanuric acid, also was found. By Martha Mendoza Associated Press The Food and Drug Administration says the industrial chemical melamine and a byproduct, cyanuric acid, have been detected in four of 89 containers of infant formula made in the United States, doubling previously reported positive results. The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies. In November, the Associated Press reported previously undisclosed FDA tests, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, showing that out of 77 containers of domestic infant formula tested, a can of milk-based liquid Nestle Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron contained traces of melamine while Mead Johnson's Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid. The FDA has now updated its response to the Associated Press' FOIA request by posting results of 89 tests on its Web site. Those results show that two additional containers of Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid. Separately, a third major formula-maker - Abbott Laboratories, whose brands include Similac - told AP in November that in-house tests had found traces of melamine in its infant formula. Those levels were below what the FDA found in the other formulas, an Abbott spokesman said, and below any national safety guidelines. The FDA tested 37 different Abbott Laboratories formulas and had no detections. Abbott, Nestle and Mead Johnson make more than 90 percent of all infant formula made in the United States. Melamine at much higher levels was recently found to have contaminated milk products around the world and has been implicated in the sickening of nearly 300,000 babies in China and killing at least six infants there. Melamine is rich in nitrogen, which registers as protein on routine tests. Authorities say the melamine was added to Chinese formula to artificially boost its protein levels. The FDA and other experts said they believed the minute melamine contamination in U.S.-made formula had occurred during the manufacturing process, rather than intentionally. The U.S. government quietly began testing domestically produced infant formula in September, soon after problems with melamine-spiked formula surfaced in China. No Chinese manufacturers of infant formula have met requirements to sell their product here, according to the FDA. Melamine can legally be used in some food packaging, and can rub off into food from there. It is also part of a cleaning solution used on some food-processing equipment. Mead Johnson officials said that the FDA had informed them of the test results and that they were confident the levels of cyanuric acid were so low that they do not pose a health risk to infants. The company said it was considering changing the cleaning solutions it uses on its manufacturing equipment to reduce cyanuric-acid contamination. Although melamine is not believed harmful in tiny amounts, higher concentrations produce kidney stones, and in serious cases can cause kidney failure. Here are the FDA results for U.S.-made formula: Two samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.412 parts per million and 0.310 ppm. Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.304 ppm, 0.406 ppm and 0.248 ppm. Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron, had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.247 ppm, 0.245 ppm and 0.249 ppm. Two samples from a can of Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron had melamine at 0.137 ppm and 0.140 ppm. Before the contamination was disclosed, federal regulators had said they were unable to set a safety threshold for melamine in infant formula. But after news reports broke, the agency set a threshold of 1 part per million of melamine in formula, provided a related chemical, including cyanuric acid, is not present. No formula has tested above that threshold.
以下是一月八号的报道原文。上面的中文翻译不完全准确。 More melamine traces found in U.S. formula FDA officials call the levels safe for babies. A byproduct, cyanuric acid, also was found. By Martha Mendoza Associated Press The Food and Drug Administration says the industrial chemical melamine and a byproduct, cyanuric acid, have been detected in four of 89 containers of infant formula made in the United States, doubling previously reported positive results. The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies. In November, the Associated Press reported previously undisclosed FDA tests, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, showing that out of 77 containers of domestic infant formula tested, a can of milk-based liquid Nestle Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron contained traces of melamine while Mead Johnson's Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid. The FDA has now updated its response to the Associated Press' FOIA request by posting results of 89 tests on its Web site. Those results show that two additional containers of Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid. Separately, a third major formula-maker - Abbott Laboratories, whose brands include Similac - told AP in November that in-house tests had found traces of melamine in its infant formula. Those levels were below what the FDA found in the other formulas, an Abbott spokesman said, and below any national safety guidelines. The FDA tested 37 different Abbott Laboratories formulas and had no detections. Abbott, Nestle and Mead Johnson make more than 90 percent of all infant formula made in the United States. Melamine at much higher levels was recently found to have contaminated milk products around the world and has been implicated in the sickening of nearly 300,000 babies in China and killing at least six infants there. Melamine is rich in nitrogen, which registers as protein on routine tests. Authorities say the melamine was added to Chinese formula to artificially boost its protein levels. The FDA and other experts said they believed the minute melamine contamination in U.S.-made formula had occurred during the manufacturing process, rather than intentionally. The U.S. government quietly began testing domestically produced infant formula in September, soon after problems with melamine-spiked formula surfaced in China. No Chinese manufacturers of infant formula have met requirements to sell their product here, according to the FDA. Melamine can legally be used in some food packaging, and can rub off into food from there. It is also part of a cleaning solution used on some food-processing equipment. Mead Johnson officials said that the FDA had informed them of the test results and that they were confident the levels of cyanuric acid were so low that they do not pose a health risk to infants. The company said it was considering changing the cleaning solutions it uses on its manufacturing equipment to reduce cyanuric-acid contamination. Although melamine is not believed harmful in tiny amounts, higher concentrations produce kidney stones, and in serious cases can cause kidney failure. Here are the FDA results for U.S.-made formula: Two samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.412 parts per million and 0.310 ppm. Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.304 ppm, 0.406 ppm and 0.248 ppm. Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron, had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.247 ppm, 0.245 ppm and 0.249 ppm. Two samples from a can of Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron had melamine at 0.137 ppm and 0.140 ppm. Before the contamination was disclosed, federal regulators had said they were unable to set a safety threshold for melamine in infant formula. But after news reports broke, the agency set a threshold of 1 part per million of melamine in formula, provided a related chemical, including cyanuric acid, is not present. No formula has tested above that threshold.
以下是引用homosapiens在2009-1-9 15:19:00的发言： 英文报道的原话：The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies. 中文报道的标题：FDA称污染极严重
以下是引用homosapiens在2009-1-9 15:19:00的发言： 英文报道的原话：The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies. 中文报道的标题：FDA称污染极严重
这种夸大其词，哗众取宠的新闻报道比比皆是。看的我有时候只想抽这些愚记！
Strongly agree! 0.X ppm means 0.X part per million!!!! Almost nothing. If you want, you can find anything at this concentration in anything. Don't scare yourself.
美国食品和药品监督管理局（FDA）8日公布的检测报告显示——
美赞臣奶粉检出三胺衍生物
本报讯（记者张瑞杰刘晓雪）美国食品和药品监督管理局（FDA）8日公布的检测报告显示，美赞臣婴儿奶粉被检出含有三聚氰胺的衍生物三聚氰酸。而雀巢婴儿奶粉也被检出含三聚氰胺。
FDA表示“污染极其严重”，因为有问题的产品比原来多了一倍。
美国FDA公布的测试结果显示，美赞臣EnfamilLIPIL补铁婴儿奶粉样本有3次检测含微量三聚氰胺的衍生物——三聚氰酸，平均含量为0.247ppm。
同时，雀巢GoodStart强化补铁婴儿奶粉样本有两次检测含微量三聚氰胺，含量分别为0.137ppm和0.140ppm。
美国FDA表示，根据此次最新检测的结果来看，有问题的产品比原来多了一倍，“污染极其严重”。不过，FDA也表示，由于是微量，对儿童来讲是安全的。
据悉，在2008年11月底，美国FDA首次公布其本土生产的婴儿奶粉检测结果时，美赞臣、雀巢部分奶粉批次中已发现含有三聚氰酸和三聚氰胺。当时，FDA根据实际情况，更改了三聚氰胺或三聚氰酸含量标准，从“零容忍”变为允许“含量在百万分之一以下”。
今日追访
美赞臣、雀巢表示在中国的产品没问题
今天上午，美赞臣公关部相关人士表示：“我们在中国的产品是通过国家相关部门检测的，完全符合国家标准，是安全的。”
据该公司解释，美国美赞臣部分产品检出三聚氰酸，可能由于在清洗设备中使用的某种洗涤剂残留所致。而中国美赞臣的生产设备清洗中没有使用该洗涤剂，故不存在“问题”。
今日上午，雀巢（中国）方面给记者发来了针对此次检查结果的声明，声明表示：
美国FDA检测的雀巢产品在中国没有销售。所有在中国销售的相关雀巢产品均有权威检测机构出具的正式检验报告，确保产品的安全且未检出三聚氰胺。
雀巢（中国）称，美国FDA已指出从健康角度来看，无须担忧，因此不需要改变食用方式。
文/记者张鑫王燕
新闻关键词
三聚氰酸
又称氰尿酸，由尿素聚合而得，略有苦味的无色无臭晶体，基本无毒。用于涂料、黏合剂、农药除草剂等。反刍类动物可消化三聚氰酸，因此被广泛添加到动物饲料中。
与学界对三聚氰胺的副作用一致认可不同，各界对三聚氰酸的危害性尚没有统一的认识。我国目前还没有对食品中所含三聚氰酸有明确的检测规定。
美赞臣的英文名字是什么？
Enfamil
Enfamil
可怜我家月月喝similac拉希!
可怜我家月月喝similac拉希!
我家是便秘。。。真是烦人啊，fda网站上写了没？啥时去看看
郁闷死了， 宝宝刚开始换成enfamil了
fda网站上so far没看见这个新闻
看看去
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-9 13:20:31编辑过]
http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/melamine/testresults.html
天啦，怎么么一样的产品有这么大的区别？？
我们吃了1年半啊！
Enfamil Lipil with Iron – 12.9 oz can
milk-based infant formula powder
出问题。
enfamil next step (9 - 24 months) 有问题吗？
从上面的link看, 应该没问题吧, 我们家也是吃这个
不过保质期是到09年10月的，在网站上那个list里没找到。
More melamine traces found in U.S. formula
FDA officials call the levels safe for babies. A byproduct, cyanuric acid, also was found.
By Martha Mendoza
Associated Press
The Food and Drug Administration says the industrial chemical melamine and a byproduct, cyanuric acid, have been detected in four of 89 containers of infant formula made in the United States, doubling previously reported positive results. The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies.
In November, the Associated Press reported previously undisclosed FDA tests, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, showing that out of 77 containers of domestic infant formula tested, a can of milk-based liquid Nestle Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron contained traces of melamine while Mead Johnson's Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid.
The FDA has now updated its response to the Associated Press' FOIA request by posting results of 89 tests on its Web site. Those results show that two additional containers of Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid.
Separately, a third major formula-maker - Abbott Laboratories, whose brands include Similac - told AP in November that in-house tests had found traces of melamine in its infant formula.
Those levels were below what the FDA found in the other formulas, an Abbott spokesman said, and below any national safety guidelines. The FDA tested 37 different Abbott Laboratories formulas and had no detections.
Abbott, Nestle and Mead Johnson make more than 90 percent of all infant formula made in the United States.
Melamine at much higher levels was recently found to have contaminated milk products around the world and has been implicated in the sickening of nearly 300,000 babies in China and killing at least six infants there. Melamine is rich in nitrogen, which registers as protein on routine tests. Authorities say the melamine was added to Chinese formula to artificially boost its protein levels.
The FDA and other experts said they believed the minute melamine contamination in U.S.-made formula had occurred during the manufacturing process, rather than intentionally. The U.S. government quietly began testing domestically produced infant formula in September, soon after problems with melamine-spiked formula surfaced in China. No Chinese manufacturers of infant formula have met requirements to sell their product here, according to the FDA.
Melamine can legally be used in some food packaging, and can rub off into food from there. It is also part of a cleaning solution used on some food-processing equipment. Mead Johnson officials said that the FDA had informed them of the test results and that they were confident the levels of cyanuric acid were so low that they do not pose a health risk to infants. The company said it was considering changing the cleaning solutions it uses on its manufacturing equipment to reduce cyanuric-acid contamination.
Although melamine is not believed harmful in tiny amounts, higher concentrations produce kidney stones, and in serious cases can cause kidney failure.
Here are the FDA results for U.S.-made formula:
Two samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.412 parts per million and 0.310 ppm.
Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.304 ppm, 0.406 ppm and 0.248 ppm.
Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron, had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.247 ppm, 0.245 ppm and 0.249 ppm.
Two samples from a can of Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron had melamine at 0.137 ppm and 0.140 ppm.
Before the contamination was disclosed, federal regulators had said they were unable to set a safety threshold for melamine in infant formula. But after news reports broke, the agency set a threshold of 1 part per million of melamine in formula, provided a related chemical, including cyanuric acid, is not present. No formula has tested above that threshold.
Enfamil
好像是
Enfamil Lipil with Iron – 12.9 oz can milk-based infant formula powder
出问题
天，借个就是最常用的那种亚。
换奶粉吧，不怕一万。。。
what is Cyanuric Acid (ppb)
三聚氰酸[C(O)NH]3
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-9 14:36:44编辑过]
好像是
Enfamil Lipil with Iron – 12.9 oz can milk-based infant formula powder
出问题。
我打电话问过E家的CS是不是其它SIZE还有种类没有问题，只是这种有问题。他们说FDA只查了这种，其它的他们不知道。但是他们强调，即使是这种也是SAFE TO USE。
换奶粉吧，不怕一万。。。
已经屯了一些。而且一直吃的是这个，怕换起来宝宝不适应。。。。
我打电话问过E家的CS是不是其它SIZE还有种类没有问题，只是这种有问题。他们说FDA只查了这种，其它的他们不知道。但是他们强调，即使是这种也是SAFE TO USE。
千万不要出事，我家娃娃吃了好几罐E亚~
千万不要出事，我家娃娃吃了好几罐E亚~
我们吃了快四个月了。。。
到底Melamine 是三聚氰胺还是Cyanuric Acid 是三聚氰胺？ Melamine
那个Cyanuric Acid 是啥咚咚。
到底Melamine 是三聚氰胺还是Cyanuric Acid 是三聚氰胺？
刚查了一下词霸，怎么两个都是三聚氰胺啊
刚查了一下词霸，怎么两个都是三聚氰胺啊
前面有人说一个是三聚氰酸。
前面有人说一个是三聚氰酸。
Cyanuric Acid是三聚氰酸.
前面有人说一个是三聚氰酸。
哦，我看错了，Cyanuric Acid是三聚氰酸
foxlsy
近日三鹿奶粉受三聚氰胺污染事件受到广泛瞩目，并造成很多婴幼儿肾脏结石，肾积水最终导致肾
衰。作为一名科学工作者，有必要从生物化学的角度阐明三聚氰胺到底是如何造成这些病理变化的。为此，我特地检索了相关的信息，希望对大家能有所帮助。首先
声明，毒理学并非本人专业，我只是阅读了pubmed 上已经发表的文章，并进行了翻译和摘要： 1. 三聚氰胺的毒性事实上是非常低的，有研究显示其急性半数致死量(LD50) > 1克每公斤体重。利用羊，兔以及老鼠作为实验对象，没有发现其有肾脏毒性。并且，有证据显示三聚氰胺在哺乳动物体内并不能被肝脏进行生物转化代谢。 2. 既然三聚氰胺没有肾毒性，为什么它能够造成肾脏衰竭并最终导致儿童死亡呢？
3.
事实上三聚氰酸单独摄入体内并不能造成很严重的后果。但是，如果三聚氰胺与三聚氰酸同是摄入体内，就会产生很严重的后果。三聚氰酸与三聚氰胺结构比较类
似，并且二者在化工生产过程中常常同时存在。因此，如果在奶粉生产过程中直接加入化工原料三聚氰胺，事实上也同时掺入了混在三聚氰胺当中的三聚氰酸。 4. 当三聚氰胺和三聚氰酸同时存在时，二者能够依靠分子结构上的氢氧基与氨基之间形成水合键，从而将二者连接起来。这种连接可以反复进行，最终形成一个网格结构。最为重要的是，这种结构是很难溶于水的，先请大家记住这点。 5. 当混在奶粉中的这种网格结构被摄入人体后，由于胃液的酸性作用，三聚氰胺和三聚氰酸相互解离，从而破坏了这种复合物，三聚氰胺和三聚氰酸于是分别被吸收入血。
6.
由于人体无法转化这两种物质，最终三聚氰胺和三聚氰酸被血液运送到肾脏，准备随尿液排除体外。然而，就在肾脏细胞中，两种物质又一次相遇，于是又进行了相
互作用，以网格结构重新形成不溶于水的大分子复合物，并沉积下来，形成结石，结果造成肾小管的物理阻塞，导致尿液无法顺利排除，使肾脏积水，最终导致肾脏
衰竭。
7.
目前尚不十分清楚为什么在血液中三聚氰胺和三聚氰酸无法相互结合形成复合体，可能的解释是只有在肾脏中由于浓缩作用，两种物质才能达到形成不溶于水复合物
的临界浓度。还有一种解释是尿酸在复合物的形成中可能发挥了起始种子的作用，如同在雨滴形成过程中灰尘核心的作用。
中文报道的标题：FDA称污染极严重
这种夸大其词，哗众取宠的新闻报道比比皆是。看的我有时候只想抽这些愚记！
以下是一月八号的报道原文。上面的中文翻译不完全准确。
More melamine traces found in U.S. formula
FDA officials call the levels safe for babies. A byproduct, cyanuric acid, also was found.
By Martha Mendoza
Associated Press
The Food and Drug Administration says the industrial chemical melamine and a byproduct, cyanuric acid, have been detected in four of 89 containers of infant formula made in the United States, doubling previously reported positive results. The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies.
In November, the Associated Press reported previously undisclosed FDA tests, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, showing that out of 77 containers of domestic infant formula tested, a can of milk-based liquid Nestle Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron contained traces of melamine while Mead Johnson's Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid.
The FDA has now updated its response to the Associated Press' FOIA request by posting results of 89 tests on its Web site. Those results show that two additional containers of Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had traces of cyanuric acid.
Separately, a third major formula-maker - Abbott Laboratories, whose brands include Similac - told AP in November that in-house tests had found traces of melamine in its infant formula.
Those levels were below what the FDA found in the other formulas, an Abbott spokesman said, and below any national safety guidelines. The FDA tested 37 different Abbott Laboratories formulas and had no detections.
Abbott, Nestle and Mead Johnson make more than 90 percent of all infant formula made in the United States.
Melamine at much higher levels was recently found to have contaminated milk products around the world and has been implicated in the sickening of nearly 300,000 babies in China and killing at least six infants there. Melamine is rich in nitrogen, which registers as protein on routine tests. Authorities say the melamine was added to Chinese formula to artificially boost its protein levels.
The FDA and other experts said they believed the minute melamine contamination in U.S.-made formula had occurred during the manufacturing process, rather than intentionally. The U.S. government quietly began testing domestically produced infant formula in September, soon after problems with melamine-spiked formula surfaced in China. No Chinese manufacturers of infant formula have met requirements to sell their product here, according to the FDA.
Melamine can legally be used in some food packaging, and can rub off into food from there. It is also part of a cleaning solution used on some food-processing equipment. Mead Johnson officials said that the FDA had informed them of the test results and that they were confident the levels of cyanuric acid were so low that they do not pose a health risk to infants. The company said it was considering changing the cleaning solutions it uses on its manufacturing equipment to reduce cyanuric-acid contamination.
Although melamine is not believed harmful in tiny amounts, higher concentrations produce kidney stones, and in serious cases can cause kidney failure.
Here are the FDA results for U.S.-made formula:
Two samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.412 parts per million and 0.310 ppm.
Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.304 ppm, 0.406 ppm and 0.248 ppm.
Three samples tested from one can of Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron, had cyanuric acid at levels of 0.247 ppm, 0.245 ppm and 0.249 ppm.
Two samples from a can of Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron had melamine at 0.137 ppm and 0.140 ppm.
Before the contamination was disclosed, federal regulators had said they were unable to set a safety threshold for melamine in infant formula. But after news reports broke, the agency set a threshold of 1 part per million of melamine in formula, provided a related chemical, including cyanuric acid, is not present. No formula has tested above that threshold.
大家仔细读读英文原文吧, 根本就是中文新闻乱炒作.
英文报道的原话：The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies.
中文报道的标题：FDA称污染极严重
这种夸大其词，哗众取宠的新闻报道比比皆是。看的我有时候只想抽这些愚记！
他们主要是为了平衡国内得毒奶粉，意思是，你看，美国的奶粉也这样，没办法
偶们家的一直吃enfamil，最近还换了next step呢。
我们家小丁吃了好些12OZ的ENFAMIL。。。。。看批号过期时间可能就是那个批的，虽然说应该没有大问题，但是知道了还是挺气愤的。
不一定的,丁妈,我刚看了,我家只有一罐12的,过期日就是09年11月,但是批号跟那个不一样
家里大大小小的enfamil还有个8-9罐, 都扔了, 烧钱. enfamil太可恨了
别扔啊,如果真有问题应该会recall的.
再fda那个网页上。为什么说goodstart也有呢？
千万不要出事，我家娃娃吃了好几罐E亚~
I hope it's safe too. My baby still drinks E formula.
天呢，我儿子一直都喝enfamil.我刚寄了12桶 next step的，打算喝到2岁多呢。怎么办，要停掉吗？
You can check the codes from the bottom of the cans. If the FDA list doesn't show they have Cyanuric Acid, they are still safe to be used.
英文报道的原话：The contamination is extremely minute, at levels federal regulators say are safe for babies.
中文报道的标题：FDA称污染极严重
这种夸大其词，哗众取宠的新闻报道比比皆是。看的我有时候只想抽这些愚记！
Strongly agree!
0.X ppm means 0.X part per million!!!! Almost nothing.
If you want, you can find anything at this concentration in anything.
Don't scare yourself.
我打电话问过E家的CS是不是其它SIZE还有种类没有问题，只是这种有问题。他们说FDA只查了这种，其它的他们不知道。但是他们强调，即使是这种也是SAFE TO USE。
那个FDA的表上不是还有gentlease, next step和nutri吗？
国内质检局发布的抽查结果(http://news.qq.com/a/20080916/003499.htm)比这里的
http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/melamine/testresults.html
糟糕多了。 注意这里fda用的是ppb (parts per billion), 不是 ppm (parts per million ) 。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-9 17:08:01编辑过]
真是讨厌国内的这些记者，昧着良心瞎翻译，自己的三鹿出了那么大的问题就非要把美国的奶粉也拖下水。真是想好好打一顿他们。我现在一般看这种中文报道，都要找找英文出处，希望各位妈妈也能这样，没必要引起不必要的恐慌
非常同意! 就是想拉别人下水为自己遮丑！
以后一定不能偷懒不找原文来看。
中文报导：极严重
都TMD什么对什么啊？这些个烂新闻真可恨！！！