对于national guards 的控制权问题说白了也是 states rights vs federal rights 之间的争斗， national guards by design 应该是给州长用的 国民警卫队的roots 是 colonial militias， 性质上属于 local defense force, 是隶属于州的，这是它存在和设计的初衷
When Can a President Take Control of the National Guard? A president can federalize the National Guard (i.e., take leadership from a governor) under the following circumstances: 1. Insurrection or Domestic Violence (Insurrection Act): • The president may federalize the National Guard if a state cannot or will not maintain order, enforce federal law, or protect constitutional rights, and the situation rises to the level of insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence. • Examples: • To suppress an insurrection against federal or state authority (10 U.S.C. § 251). • When a state’s refusal or inability to enforce federal law obstructs its execution (10 U.S.C. § 252). • To protect civil rights when a state fails to do so (10 U.S.C. § 253). • Process: The president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying federalized forces (10 U.S.C. § 254). However, this can be bypassed in urgent cases. 2. National Emergency or War: • Under Title 10, the president can federalize the National Guard during a declared national emergency, war, or other significant threats to national security (e.g., 10 U.S.C. § 12302 for partial mobilization). • Examples: Deployments for World War II, the Iraq War, or post-9/11 operations. 3. Enforcement of Federal Law: • If a governor refuses to enforce federal law or court orders (e.g., desegregation), the president can federalize the Guard to ensure compliance. • Historical example: In 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock after Governor Orval Faubus resisted. 4. Request or Consent of the Governor: • A governor may voluntarily request federal assistance, allowing the president to federalize the Guard for missions like disaster response or border security. • Example: Hurricane Katrina (2005), where the Louisiana National Guard was partially federalized to support relief efforts. 5. Other Statutory Authorities: • The president can federalize the Guard for specific missions under laws like the Stafford Act (for disaster relief) or homeland security operations, often in coordination with governors. • Example: Federalizing Guard units for COVID-19 response or border security missions under federal funding. 看得懂英文吗？ 满嘴造谣的五毛！
对于national guards 的控制权问题说白了也是 states rights vs federal rights 之间的争斗， national guards by design 应该是给州长用的 国民警卫队的roots 是 colonial militias， 性质上属于 local defense force, 是隶属于州的，这是它存在和设计的初衷 teabucket 发表于 2025-06-09 13:25
Walker1921 发表于 2025-06-09 13:36 When Can a President Take Control of the National Guard? A president can federalize the National Guard (i.e., take leadership from a governor) under the following circumstances: 1. Insurrection or Domestic Violence (Insurrection Act): • The president may federalize the National Guard if a state cannot or will not maintain order, enforce federal law, or protect constitutional rights, and the situation rises to the level of insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence. • Examples: • To suppress an insurrection against federal or state authority (10 U.S.C. § 251). • When a state’s refusal or inability to enforce federal law obstructs its execution (10 U.S.C. § 252). • To protect civil rights when a state fails to do so (10 U.S.C. § 253). • Process: The president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying federalized forces (10 U.S.C. § 254). However, this can be bypassed in urgent cases. 2. National Emergency or War: • Under Title 10, the president can federalize the National Guard during a declared national emergency, war, or other significant threats to national security (e.g., 10 U.S.C. § 12302 for partial mobilization). • Examples: Deployments for World War II, the Iraq War, or post-9/11 operations. 3. Enforcement of Federal Law: • If a governor refuses to enforce federal law or court orders (e.g., desegregation), the president can federalize the Guard to ensure compliance. • Historical example: In 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock after Governor Orval Faubus resisted. 4. Request or Consent of the Governor: • A governor may voluntarily request federal assistance, allowing the president to federalize the Guard for missions like disaster response or border security. • Example: Hurricane Katrina (2005), where the Louisiana National Guard was partially federalized to support relief efforts. 5. Other Statutory Authorities: • The president can federalize the Guard for specific missions under laws like the Stafford Act (for disaster relief) or homeland security operations, often in coordination with governors. • Example: Federalizing Guard units for COVID-19 response or border security missions under federal funding. 看得懂英文吗？ 满嘴造谣的五毛！
Insurrection act 最大的争议和问题就是彻底废了 checks and balances. 把政府行政部门军事化而不受监管。 The Insurrection Act has no provisions for oversight or checks and balances, meaning the president has sole authority to decide when to deploy federal troops to enforce the laws of the United States.
teabucket 发表于 2025-06-09 13:25 对于national guards 的控制权问题说白了也是 states rights vs federal rights 之间的争斗， national guards by design 应该是给州长用的 国民警卫队的roots 是 colonial militias， 性质上属于 local defense force, 是隶属于州的，这是它存在和设计的初衷
@msnbc In an exclusive interview with NBC News' Jacob Soboroff, California Governor Gavin Newsom addressed White House border czar Tom Homan's threats of arrest. "Tom, arrest me. Let's go," Newsom said. The governor also plans to sue the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard. #MSNBC#news#LA#politics♬ original sound - MSNBC
BREAKING: In shocking footage of Trump in 2020 that is now going viral, Trump says it’s against the law for a president to call in the National Guard on his own: “We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor.” MAGA = 🤡.
Perfectly good tomatoes are being plowed over — instead of picked — in South Florida as local farmers blame Trump tariffs, immigration crackdown for business losses and wasted crops. pic.twitter.com/75X4hMlucZ — Bryan Dawson🇺🇸 (@BryanDawsonUSA) June 8, 2025
teabucket 发表于 2025-06-09 15:58 纽森面对威胁没跪， come and arrest me
@msnbc In an exclusive interview with NBC News' Jacob Soboroff, California Governor Gavin Newsom addressed White House border czar Tom Homan's threats of arrest. "Tom, arrest me. Let's go," Newsom said. The governor also plans to sue the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard. #MSNBC#news#LA#politics♬ original sound - MSNBC
马斯克 这几天
每天都在给川普的帖子 ”点赞”
马斯克 服软了感觉，
过几天有可能会 把 马斯克 再次 揽入怀里，向大家炫耀
跟东大谈 如果谈不拢 折腾美华呗
终极目标是当皇帝 具体路径不详，他朝令夕改，恐怕自己也不清楚
这周主要折腾纽森
给纽森涨粉啊
涨不了一点
如果把纽森抓起来真会给他涨粉。
黄油靠边站。涨不涨粉跟你们没半毛钱关系。
现在也涨了很多了，纽森大叔不畏强权捍卫自由的演讲，使他看起来更帅了。
莫名其妙，公共论坛还捂嘴，黄左这么霸道
民主党22个州长已经表态反川了
你个川粉才是无知吧，在州长反对下强行调动national guards 本来就会有 legal , political and constitutional issues 这都不懂。
国民警卫队设计上隶属于州政府，总统强行接管国民警卫队，只能用 Insurrections 造反叛乱这种借口。 你才在传播misinformation. 当national guards 被总统强行federalized 以后，是不可以用来执行 domestic law-enforcement, 只有那种极端情况比如 insurrection act 才可以辩一下。 你们川粉的思维是不是以为州长和总统是上下级关系？ 太幼稚了
啥！200个deal被风给刮跑了吗？
国民警卫队的roots 是 colonial militias， 性质上属于 local defense force, 是隶属于州的，这是它存在和设计的初衷
黄川粉当奴才当习惯了，在他们的世界里，任何人不是主子就是奴隶，不是你给我跪着就是我给你跪着，大家都站着是绝对不允许的。
When Can a President Take Control of the National Guard? A president can federalize the National Guard (i.e., take leadership from a governor) under the following circumstances: 1. Insurrection or Domestic Violence (Insurrection Act): • The president may federalize the National Guard if a state cannot or will not maintain order, enforce federal law, or protect constitutional rights, and the situation rises to the level of insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence. • Examples: • To suppress an insurrection against federal or state authority (10 U.S.C. § 251). • When a state’s refusal or inability to enforce federal law obstructs its execution (10 U.S.C. § 252). • To protect civil rights when a state fails to do so (10 U.S.C. § 253). • Process: The president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying federalized forces (10 U.S.C. § 254). However, this can be bypassed in urgent cases. 2. National Emergency or War: • Under Title 10, the president can federalize the National Guard during a declared national emergency, war, or other significant threats to national security (e.g., 10 U.S.C. § 12302 for partial mobilization). • Examples: Deployments for World War II, the Iraq War, or post-9/11 operations. 3. Enforcement of Federal Law: • If a governor refuses to enforce federal law or court orders (e.g., desegregation), the president can federalize the Guard to ensure compliance. • Historical example: In 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock after Governor Orval Faubus resisted. 4. Request or Consent of the Governor: • A governor may voluntarily request federal assistance, allowing the president to federalize the Guard for missions like disaster response or border security. • Example: Hurricane Katrina (2005), where the Louisiana National Guard was partially federalized to support relief efforts. 5. Other Statutory Authorities: • The president can federalize the Guard for specific missions under laws like the Stafford Act (for disaster relief) or homeland security operations, often in coordination with governors. • Example: Federalizing Guard units for COVID-19 response or border security missions under federal funding. 看得懂英文吗？ 满嘴造谣的五毛！
川粉的逻辑
你自己看得懂吗，这不就是我说的极端情况。 而且你貌似连国民警卫队的起源都不懂。 家教不行啊
是的，不怕不识货就怕货比货。我本来已经不想看到他了，这次再看到他一下觉得他的形象又高大起来了，最烂的民主党政客也比maga强
把那bitch当年说的都扔还给她脸上
20多个蓝州州长都联合谴责了
多行不义必自毙，人算不如天算，这么大一把年纪了 ，明天说挂就挂了。
那不是有句话吗，明天和意外，谁先来？ 送给他
是，典型的联邦权侵犯州权，各位州长得看清楚了，今天侵犯加州，明天就可能侵犯你的州。这是政治体制和宪法的问题，不是左右，也不是红蓝。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8M7Nn8t/
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://x.com/calltoactivism/status/1932137612136915255
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://x.com/bryandawsonusa/status/1931855673912123883
这个时候被逮捕就跟martyr一样。立马在民主党涨威信。
不单单政客，还有大学校长，各国元首
纽森估计知道早晚轮到他。毕竟加州是块最大的骨头床铺和走狗早就盯着啃呢。
我隔壁贴的视屏里面真怒了。有一段声音都有点抖了。我原来不待见他，现在真是帅。
在黑与白面前，还要去分左跟右吗？
马斯克全力以赴支持他的统领的时候，甚至搞出假的1million lottery，当时政府也没有威胁cancel他的政府合同，要做的也只是法律层面上的提告。美国的民主自由，让马斯克可以无所畏惧地搞科技搞电车发家，也可以让他无所畏惧的发表自己的意见而不担心被威胁，现在呢？
选举中All in，地位如日中天的他，现在有不同的意见，也会被威胁被fear，这说明了什么？
更别说普通人
我说错什么了？左党领导涨不涨粉跟你一个黄鼬有毛线关系？还涨不了一点。笑死个人。
右派精神领袖之一Charlie Kirk 发声了，这个画面第一次呼吁legal 也要赶走了，当然冠冕堂皇的借口是这些人不爱美国，谁来定义爱不爱的