回复 8楼 bluepearl 的帖子 不要随便扣帽子。 我在贴子中文后面标明了原文来源“The Government Details Its Demands | Harvard Magazine” 。你没看到。我把整个内容贴在这里。你也可去Harvard Magazine的网页看。 ************************************************************* The Government Details Its Demands What Harvard is being asked to do as the Trump administration threatens research funding by John S. RosenbergUniversity Hall | PHOTOGRAPH BY NIKO YAITANES/HARVARD MAGAZINE Following the March 31 announcement that “a comprehensive review of federal contracts and grants at Harvard University and its affiliates” would be undertaken to ensure “compliance with federal regulations, including its civil rights responsibilities,” the federal government’s Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism last night detailed its demands (“next steps”) via a letter to President Alan M. Garber and Harvard Corporation senior fellow Penny Pritzker. The letter details “several broad, non-exhaustive areas of reform that the government views as necessary for Harvard to implement to remain a responsible recipient of federal taxpayer dollars. We look forward to a meaningful dialogue focused on lasting, structural reforms at Harvard,” including: ● Oversight and accountability for biased programs that fuel antisemitism. “Programs and departments that fuel antisemitic harassment” must be changed to “address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture.” ● Disciplinary reform and consistent accountability. This comprises a requirement that disciplinary policies be made consistent and centrally accountable—and a specific requirement that masking must be banned, so protestors can be identified, plus a “clarified” time, place, and manner policy governing protests. Atop these specifics, Harvard “must review and report on disciplinary actions for antisemitic rule violations since October 7, 2023.” Subscribe to our Friday email: This Week Join thousands of Harvard Magazine readers getting the top Harvard stories in their inbox every Friday. Email Address ● Student groups and their leaders “must be held accountable for violations of Harvard policy.” ● “Harvard must make meaningful governance reforms to improve its organizational structure to foster clear lines of authority and accountability, and to empower faculty and administrative leaders who are committed to implementing the changes indicated in this letter.” ● Merit-based admissions reform. “Harvard must adopt and implement merit-based admissions policies,” ceasing “all preferences based on race, color, or national origin…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Merit-based hiring reform. University hiring policies must “cease all preferences based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in hiring throughout its teaching and research faculty, staff, and leadership…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). “DEI programs teach students, faculty, staff, and leadership to make snap judgments about each other based on crude race and identity stereotypes, which fuels division and hatred based on race, color, national origin, and other protected identity characteristics. All efforts should be made to shutter such programs.” ● Cooperation with law enforcement. “Harvard must cooperate with law enforcement to ensure student safety.” ● Transparency and reporting. “Harvard must comply fully with existing statutory reporting requirements under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, commit to full cooperation with DHS [Department of Homeland Security] and other federal regulators, and make organizational changes as necessary to enable full compliance.”
iamamrman 发表于 2025-05-28 09:28 回复 8楼 bluepearl 的帖子 不要随便扣帽子。 我在贴子中文后面标明了原文来源“The Government Details Its Demands | Harvard Magazine” 。你没看到。我把整个内容贴在这里。你也可去Harvard Magazine的网页看。 ************************************************************* The Government Details Its Demands What Harvard is being asked to do as the Trump administration threatens research funding by John S. RosenbergUniversity Hall | PHOTOGRAPH BY NIKO YAITANES/HARVARD MAGAZINE Following the March 31 announcement that “a comprehensive review of federal contracts and grants at Harvard University and its affiliates” would be undertaken to ensure “compliance with federal regulations, including its civil rights responsibilities,” the federal government’s Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism last night detailed its demands (“next steps”) via a letter to President Alan M. Garber and Harvard Corporation senior fellow Penny Pritzker. The letter details “several broad, non-exhaustive areas of reform that the government views as necessary for Harvard to implement to remain a responsible recipient of federal taxpayer dollars. We look forward to a meaningful dialogue focused on lasting, structural reforms at Harvard,” including: ● Oversight and accountability for biased programs that fuel antisemitism. “Programs and departments that fuel antisemitic harassment” must be changed to “address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture.” ● Disciplinary reform and consistent accountability. This comprises a requirement that disciplinary policies be made consistent and centrally accountable—and a specific requirement that masking must be banned, so protestors can be identified, plus a “clarified” time, place, and manner policy governing protests. Atop these specifics, Harvard “must review and report on disciplinary actions for antisemitic rule violations since October 7, 2023.” Subscribe to our Friday email: This Week Join thousands of Harvard Magazine readers getting the top Harvard stories in their inbox every Friday. Email Address ● Student groups and their leaders “must be held accountable for violations of Harvard policy.” ● “Harvard must make meaningful governance reforms to improve its organizational structure to foster clear lines of authority and accountability, and to empower faculty and administrative leaders who are committed to implementing the changes indicated in this letter.” ● Merit-based admissions reform. “Harvard must adopt and implement merit-based admissions policies,” ceasing “all preferences based on race, color, or national origin…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Merit-based hiring reform. University hiring policies must “cease all preferences based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in hiring throughout its teaching and research faculty, staff, and leadership…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). “DEI programs teach students, faculty, staff, and leadership to make snap judgments about each other based on crude race and identity stereotypes, which fuels division and hatred based on race, color, national origin, and other protected identity characteristics. All efforts should be made to shutter such programs.” ● Cooperation with law enforcement. “Harvard must cooperate with law enforcement to ensure student safety.” ● Transparency and reporting. “Harvard must comply fully with existing statutory reporting requirements under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, commit to full cooperation with DHS [Department of Homeland Security] and other federal regulators, and make organizational changes as necessary to enable full compliance.”
说得都是冠冕堂皇，比如这条； ● “Harvard must make meaningful governance reforms to improve its organizational structure to foster clear lines of authority and accountability, and to empower faculty and administrative leaders who are committed to implementing the changes indicated in this letter.” 翻译过来就是：听川皇话才能上位。
● 对助长反犹太主义的偏见性项目进行监督和问责。“那些助长反犹太主义骚扰的项目和部门”必须进行改革，以“解决偏见问题，改善观点多样性，并终止意识形态操控”。
● 纪律改革和持续问责。这包括一项要求，即纪律处分政策必须保持一致并由中央负责——以及一项具体要求，即必须禁止佩戴口罩，以便能够识别抗议者，并制定“明确”的抗议活动的时间、地点和方式政策。除此之外，哈佛大学“必须审查并报告自2023年10月7日以来针对违反反犹太主义规则行为的纪律处分”。
● 学生团体及其领导人“必须对违反哈佛政策的行为负责”。
● “哈佛大学必须进行有意义的治理改革，以改善其组织结构，建立明确的权力和问责制，并授权那些致力于实施本信中所述变革的教职员工和行政领导。”
● 择优录取改革。“哈佛大学必须采用并实施择优录取政策”，停止“所有基于种族、肤色或国籍的偏好……”，并证明此类变革是“持久的”。
● 择优招聘改革。大学招聘政策必须“在招聘教学和科研人员、教职员工和领导层时，停止所有基于种族、肤色、宗教、性别或国籍的偏好……”，并证明此类改变是“持久的”。
● 多元化、公平和包容性 (DEI)。“DEI 项目会教导学生、教职员工和领导层基于粗暴的种族和身份刻板印象对彼此做出草率的判断，这加剧了基于种族、肤色、国籍和其他受保护身份特征的分裂和仇恨。应尽一切努力关闭此类项目。”
● 与执法部门合作。“哈佛大学必须与执法部门合作，确保学生安全。”
● 透明度和报告。“哈佛大学必须完全遵守《高等教育法》第 117 条规定的现有法定报告要求，承诺与国土安全部 (DHS) 和其他联邦监管机构充分合作，并在必要时进行组织变革，以确保完全合规。”
The Government Details Its Demands | Harvard Magazine
🔥 最新回帖
川普一向是漫天要价，就地还钱的风格。
卖鸡蛋的老黄婆是你啊，最近不卖鸡蛋啦， 还是脑子不好忘记卖啦。。。 😂😂
川粉只要铁拳不砸到自己头上——哪怕是曾经的自己，怎么都能找到洗的角度，这一点你尽管放心。川普1.0要整老中学生时川粉也是一片叫好，垃圾小留不要来最好，免得抢我们家孩子的名额；垃圾小留都是请了中介包装申请材料的，不如咱家ABC货真价实；怎么，是来美国读研的老留？那就是间谍呗，不然怎么不整别人就整你呢？
🛋️ 沙发板凳
哪里才这几个要求。
还有好多，上交学生信息等，难以实现的要求。
当然是你来定啊，都听你的
很对啊，哈佛可以无视政府的要求，政府有权利不给批经费啊，是双向的
是的，就这几条。这是哈佛自己的网页Harvard Magazine上登的。
原文题目：The Government Details Its Demands | Harvard Magazine
真觉得你读不懂英文，因为原帖下面就是信息来源，还是英文的，你还问？是不是不知道Harvard Magazine是啥？
你就把原文/照片 贴到主贴里嘛。 虽然很多人确实不看/看不懂英文，但你不贴原文他们还较真。
发言人这话是指的希望哈佛以后培养蓝领工人吗？她这话没错，高等教育多培养点对社会有实用的学生，少培养一堆对社会充满幻想和无知又没有生存能力的废柴，大学毕业找不到工作，搬回家跟父母同住，然后在网络上到大街上去抗议游行支持LGBTQ，支持恐怖主义
确实很缺电工水管工啊，贵就算了，现在很难找到水平好的。那些乌泱泱gender study的毕业生也找不到工作，成为社会负担
今早看到视频 要吐了
把你的孩子培养成蓝领就行了 黄右们赶紧的领旨
不要随便扣帽子。 我在贴子中文后面标明了原文来源“The Government Details Its Demands | Harvard Magazine” 。你没看到。我把整个内容贴在这里。你也可去Harvard Magazine的网页看。
************************************************************* The Government Details Its Demands What Harvard is being asked to do as the Trump administration threatens research funding by John S. Rosenberg
Following the March 31 announcement that “a comprehensive review of federal contracts and grants at Harvard University and its affiliates” would be undertaken to ensure “compliance with federal regulations, including its civil rights responsibilities,” the federal government’s Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism last night detailed its demands (“next steps”) via a letter to President Alan M. Garber and Harvard Corporation senior fellow Penny Pritzker. The letter details “several broad, non-exhaustive areas of reform that the government views as necessary for Harvard to implement to remain a responsible recipient of federal taxpayer dollars. We look forward to a meaningful dialogue focused on lasting, structural reforms at Harvard,” including: ● Oversight and accountability for biased programs that fuel antisemitism. “Programs and departments that fuel antisemitic harassment” must be changed to “address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture.” ● Disciplinary reform and consistent accountability. This comprises a requirement that disciplinary policies be made consistent and centrally accountable—and a specific requirement that masking must be banned, so protestors can be identified, plus a “clarified” time, place, and manner policy governing protests. Atop these specifics, Harvard “must review and report on disciplinary actions for antisemitic rule violations since October 7, 2023.” Subscribe to our Friday email: This Week Join thousands of Harvard Magazine readers getting the top Harvard stories in their inbox every Friday. Email Address
● Student groups and their leaders “must be held accountable for violations of Harvard policy.” ● “Harvard must make meaningful governance reforms to improve its organizational structure to foster clear lines of authority and accountability, and to empower faculty and administrative leaders who are committed to implementing the changes indicated in this letter.” ● Merit-based admissions reform. “Harvard must adopt and implement merit-based admissions policies,” ceasing “all preferences based on race, color, or national origin…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Merit-based hiring reform. University hiring policies must “cease all preferences based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in hiring throughout its teaching and research faculty, staff, and leadership…” and demonstrate that such changes are “durable.” ● Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). “DEI programs teach students, faculty, staff, and leadership to make snap judgments about each other based on crude race and identity stereotypes, which fuels division and hatred based on race, color, national origin, and other protected identity characteristics. All efforts should be made to shutter such programs.” ● Cooperation with law enforcement. “Harvard must cooperate with law enforcement to ensure student safety.” ● Transparency and reporting. “Harvard must comply fully with existing statutory reporting requirements under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, commit to full cooperation with DHS [Department of Homeland Security] and other federal regulators, and make organizational changes as necessary to enable full compliance.”
DEI出现的原因，的的确确就是有色人种、女性等弱势群体在社会中被歧视。不管DEI运动近年采取的具体手段是否恰当，都不能否定DEI这需求本身的合理性，而只能改革DEI实现的具体手段。比如说录取优待黑人学生不能直接给名额，而是帮助黑人学生达到足够的录取标准，如此等等。但川普和MAGA要的则是全盘否定DEI。
说什么必须跟执法部门合作保证学生安全。我问问哈佛学生哪里没有安全了？借这种根本不成立的借口，把东厂特务安插到哈佛里去钳制言论和学术自由以及学生老师的人事，这就是白色恐怖，这就是盖世太保。
Barron怎么不去学电工水管工呢？？？
就不用装了吧。
现在还和MAGA讲细节，讲道理？
MAGA的道理最高大上了，MAGA是“为了让美国伟大”。要比大道理，除了要世界和平，宇宙安乐之外，只怕身在美国的，很难找比这到更高大上的道理了。如果不比高大上，比细节，呵呵，决定了立场之后，谁还讲不出一堆道理啊？
其实现在就是立场问题。
主动真心要和MAGA讲道理的人（那些不得不如此的除外：比如，要打官司，要宣传。。。），要么就是坏 - 和MAGA一个立场；要么就是蠢 - 还能觉得MAGA的那些道理真值得一驳。
蓝领也比培养成LGBTQ强
川粉总是会自我感动。
川粉脑子里真的都是水
恐同即深同 你是家里有还是自己就是啊？
蓝领是工作，LGBTQ是生活，这俩怎么搁一起比较谁比谁强的？你靠做LGBTQ赚钱啊？
所以说川粉没有知识没有文化呢
以为lgpt是培养出来的，要是这样，这些粉让马斯克情以何堪啊。
不拿来掌嘴都说不过去。
啥玩意儿，我了解到的PI们都恨死川普了
川粉说话和川普一样，全凭想象，大嘴一张什么都来。上次还有个川粉说川普收拾的都是文科，理工科教授都高兴得磕头打滚，然后立马被一个做物理的怼了：你全家才磕头打滚。
川粉不会以为没有lgbt蓝领吧
华人和哈佛打过官司了，不是赢了吗？
ICE赶紧把黄川粉都抓走 黄川粉的后代世世代代做水管工 电工
别搅浑水了。如果他们选了川皇，那他们恨的人应该是自己！！就像版上一个外嫁说因为一个民主党的朋友嘲笑她外嫁，于是她就选了川皇和他的要禁止异族通婚的共和党。一定要记住脑子不要随便进水，还要记住不作死就不会死！
我看白宫发言人和Charlie Kirk的言论，他们应该认为美国更需要蓝领工人，而且随着AI的发展，大部分高等教育的文凭会失去价值
谁信谁傻，这些人要的就是愚民，不能让老百姓接触知识和科学，要老百姓心甘情愿做韭菜，否则老百姓有了理论支持，反对他们暴政咋办？坚决要扼杀知识和科学
你是这楼里唯一一个言之有物的川黑。 DEI的初衷是好的，但是现在已经变质了，我相信你心里也认同DEI太过了；而且毛主席教导大家：矫枉必须过正，不过正不能矫枉。全盘否定才能建立新秩序。
政府给钱当然可以提要求，甲方乙方的逻辑很好理解。
哈佛可以坚持做自己，例如DEI,那就不拿政府的钱好啦，总之既要又要走不通啦
“既要又要走不通” 这话明显不是事实。
之前这么多年走的很通的。至于现在通不通，看谁能斗赢而已。但说话还是要基于事实，不要把自己的愿望（比如，您不希望他们能做到既要又要？），说的好像事实就是“走不通”似的。
事实是：以前走的通，现在正在斗，将来如何不肯定。无论哪个，直接张嘴就用“走不通”来总结，都是不尊重事实的。
让随便什么颜色的人好好学习，绿人，紫人，女人，lgbtq都可以，只需要一件事，取消黑箱，城门立柱。只要有铁一样的标准，你还怕没有少数族裔去迎头赶上么？再怎么样不比现在偷偷摸摸得好处的白人强。哈佛之类学校错误的行为授人以柄，难道不是另一种川普的帮凶。 老毛的工农兵大学生最后怎么样了？最后建立新秩序了，还是臭老九们站起来之后疯狂蔑视工人到毫无地位？中国录取从来不看男女，也没见女人考不上学，倒是越来越高考女生入学比男生比例更高。
你的逻辑一点不感人，现在给钱的已经提要求啦。 好了，知道你是本站最喜欢咬文嚼字，focus 芝麻的，不和你钻。
坐等看戏哈佛战更有意思！
逻辑为啥要感人？
我只是指出了你说话的一个漏洞而已。你觉得这个不是漏洞，那么我们就可以争一争。你要觉得这是漏洞但无关紧要，那么就不用争了，我也没说你这个漏洞很重要嘛。
哎，一看你就是川黑啊，哈哈！
政府有没有权利不给哈佛钱还真不好说。钱是怎么花的，花多少都是国会决定的。一般来讲行政部门没有权利改变同意不？
如果哈佛跟楼主说 - 没有任何用，不改变任何事情。
如果哈佛在媒体上这么说 - 基本上用处不大 - 支持哈佛的还是支持哈佛，支持MAGA的一样支持MAGA。至于摇摆的人 - 就要看具体怎么宣传了。如果仅仅就是说这么一句，肯定没用。
如果哈佛在法庭上这么说 - 基本上也用处不大，法庭考虑的是其他法律细节。
碰上和MAGA有关的事，如果首先想的就是讲道理，那你就输了。。。
想大家做蓝领，大家干不干可不知道。我只看到家门口修车厂老板退休了，没人接班，关门歇业，常去的馆子老板退休，没人接班，关门歇业，搞landscaping的大叔，手下都是劳模，说找不到年轻美国人来接班，连修空调的都说招不到年轻人。这些都是高收入的蓝领，还不是没人肯干。
比如眼线副总统
大家要分清楚美国的问题是什么 现在的问题是过度政治正确，而不是政治正确 --- 美国民权运动几十年争取的反歧视，种族平等等等是积极正面的， 但是发展到过度政治正确，以至于开始逆向歧视， 可以骂白人不许骂黑人，黑人入学成绩比白人亚洲人低一大截等等，这些是逆向歧视， 是过度政治正确。
俺反对过度政治正确，而不是政治正确。俺反对逆向歧视，而不是反对歧视！ LGBT等应该和普通人拥有同样权力，而不是凌驾于其他人头上。 DEI是过度政治正确，因为它从结果上定条条框框强制有都少这个那个种族性别等。 不论政府还是私营机构，应该以merit 为基础，因为他们需要对国民 、股东 、 顾客负责。
但是说这些都是闲谈。 Trump这次要求的中心思想是啥？ 看第一条就知道中心思想了 --- 就是禁止反犹！ 不要以为下面贴点啥反DEI就能骗到俺们这些见识过共产党的中国人。
这种纳粹行为，任何尚有人性，思想自由的非奴隶都是无法接受的 - 俺们逃离共产党的思想压制，不是为了来奉迎犹大儿皇帝Trump 的顺昌逆亡的 这次俺支持哈佛，反对独裁，反对专制！
MAGA好骗，哈佛没有这么好骗。如果确实有问题，那么应该针对的是制造问题的人。把做research funding取消，不允许哈佛招国际学生，这些政策是在解决问题吗？
重回中世纪嘛。下面全是文盲，只有上面的少数贵族可以读书认字。
"只要有铁一样的标准，你还怕没有少数族裔去迎头赶上么？"我倒觉得某大少数民族肯定不会努力学习迎头赶上的，他们不会反思为什么他们不成功，只会说这是对他们的歧视。我家娃以前有个黑人同学，父母都是医生，住的大豪宅，跟我家娃说这个国家欠他们的，我当时就无语了
照你们川粉的这种逻辑，我给政府交了税，政府收了我的钱，政府是不是应该听我的话？如果不听我的话，最好政府有骨气，以后都别要我交税。
你是第二个言之有物的川黑。这样的讨论多多益善，比起楼里那些只会人身攻击的川黑境界高出太多了！ 至于你认为川普罗列的这些条款旨在第一条，其它的都是附加条款。这只是你的个人观点，而且我谨慎怀疑你其实也支持后面的几条观点。参见隔壁斯坦福大学的提案，你支持斯坦福的新提案吗？ 至于第一条，禁止反犹。我认为，高校最主要的职能是培养人才，高校是科学的温床，不是政治思想的温床。反犹还是不反犹这种意识形态的东西大学应该淡化。不应该借着自己在高校领头的地位领导人民的意识。
没错，而且录取过程必须公平公正公开，哈佛妥协才是最优解
“DEI太过了”不就正是你提倡的“矫枉过正了”吗？把这个“过”的程度改正一下就可以了，为什么要全盘否认DEI？
这个bitch自己学的也是虚头八脑的communication 专业，川普全家也没学电工水管工的，都该打回技校改造。
教育拨款向技校倾斜和AI发展是否会大量吸引愿意做高薪蓝领的人我不知道，但我相信大搞AA，DEI，LGBTQ和快乐教育，是不可能培养出一批尊重知识技能，吃苦耐劳的技术人才的
疮党的混蛋逻辑从来就是这样，没有对立也要创造对立，拉仇恨才能造声势 仿佛美国就剩这点钱了，给了哈佛，就摧毁了技校，所以哈佛和技校势不两立 lol
对，关了哈佛，都上川胖大学可以培养一批，哈哈 川胖上来之后哪一项政策是为这个国家服务的，为选民谋福祉的？？？都是为自己家捞钱的。大美丽法案还有条款废除tanning bed税呢，Make America Tan Again，谁爱tan我不说哈哈哈
动不动就疮党，是谁在制造对立？相对来说，即使不把给哈佛的拨款分给技校，也比培养一批仇美不愿意或者根本没能力干好蓝领工作的haters好。 楼上那个说蓝领工作找不到年轻美国人来接班”连修空调的都说招不到年轻人。”不恰恰证明了我的观点？这些年来大搞AA，DEI，LGBTQ和快乐教育，恰恰就是在美国本土找不到尊重知识技能和吃苦耐劳的技术人才的根源。
我认为哈佛会先怂，立贴为证
川粉们这么看重蓝领行业，可以不要报藤校，把自己的娃们送去技校都往水管工电工修空调方面去培养，好好为美国培养吃苦耐劳的技工型人才。不要像你们川皇一样，就会嘴上说得漂亮，自己家儿子孙子的，没一个当技工的。
我也投哈佛会先怂，horse race betting…可以设个投票
这就是支持DEI的人的认知？作为家长可以强迫孩子选择或不选择藤校？认为美国需要重视蓝领行业，必须把自己的孩子送去技校培养？
少在那假惺惺，对立只有一方也是对不起来的。说到对立，川粉也是功不可没啊。 大统领果然说啥都对，黄川粉们一定要响应号召，把娃们送进技校，为美国的再次伟大添砖加瓦。
你以为trump尊重知识？ 密大的工程学院昨天就发信给全体教授和员工，要大家申请自愿退休。这是工程学院，而且包括的还有已经有tenure的教授。这就是为了培养技术人才？
只要你对难民展示出一点同情不也被川粉骂接难民回家，所以让川粉孩子当蓝领也是用魔法打败魔法罢了。
哈哈，以后就叫黄婆川黑好了，聪明的意思👍🤣🤣
怎么感觉跟中国很类似的现状啊。。
自食其力的蓝领也比在家无所事事吸大麻的废柴强啊
又回到文革的知识分子上山下乡，赤脚医生那一套了。美国在步中国后尘
川粉家长可以从小给孩子洗脑当技工多么好，天天说月月说，不愁孩子不受影响。你们不是老说美国小学给孩子洗脑LGBT吗？以后LGBT也不让宣传了，正好让出阵地你们上，开洗长大当技工嘛。
我更相信一个开赌场全家卖币捞钱的无耻老流氓只会把美国搞得更差。以God的理由投票给这个鬼的只能说是被撒旦蒙了心。
说得都是冠冕堂皇，比如这条； ● “Harvard must make meaningful governance reforms to improve its organizational structure to foster clear lines of authority and accountability, and to empower faculty and administrative leaders who are committed to implementing the changes indicated in this letter.” 翻译过来就是：听川皇话才能上位。